Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

This is a 1897 Elgin Grade 116 B. W. Raymond I've been carrying for the last week or so.  It's a railroad grade during a time when stem sets were allowed to be used as railroad watches.  Several years later, that standard was changed to only allow lever sets in an effort to reduce miss-setting the watch during winding.

Edited by klinej54
editing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/16/2016 at 8:06 PM, ramrod said:

What is the size of pocket watch movement that would fit a 35 - 40 mm case?

 

20 hours ago, DaveCoatsworth said:

A better photo of the movement...

 

 

Illinois4380034Mvmt.jpg

Lovely watch.  Nice to see the pocket watch guys popping up!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, DaveCoatsworth said:

Nice B. W. Raymond.  Don't see two tone Elgins that often.

That's a beautiful watch. How do you clean the non-shock protected jewels? I see it has two little screws, but when I removed the screws on my pocket watch, the thing didn't even budge.

 

J

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/3/2016 at 9:29 AM, dadistic said:

My Airspeed, an acrylic sandwich that houses a Miyota 8219 movement, The dial is laid our like a regulator. All in all a fun watch that I'm enjoying a lot.IMG_2008.JPG

that is really a great looking watch. who makes it? airspeed?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ramrod said:

i got a few dimpled dials. not much you can do about that i'm afraid.

that should have a quickset date with the push of the crown?

The date quickset is by the button at 3 o'clock. I believe this button is a replacement...from where I don't know as it doesn't look like any pusher I've seen before.

Anil

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, RyMoeller said:

Okay, I challenge anyone to defeat this- the Merry Toys, a division of Leisure Dynamics, Inc. (I kid you not), wrist watch!

IMG_1546.JPG

 

I'll meet your challenge with a Genuine Hop-a-long Cassidy watch from the 50's ....

 

DSC00024.JPG

DSC00023.JPG

 

And raise the ante with a Genuine Timex from the 80's  from their " Waterfall " Collection...

 

DSC00007.JPG

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Welcome! To which part of India will my greetings go? Frank
    • I agree with @Waggy, no need to adjust. That looks very good to me. The factory specs for 7S26 are something like -35 to +45s/day, but they are usually better. The amplitude is good. When wearing, the most important positions are dial up, crown down and crown left. You need to regulate so that these positions average out to about zero. Crown down is showing +14, so you may have to set dial up to slightly minus s/day. The absolute values of +/-s/day don't really matter, as long as they aren't too far out. The only way to get good accuracy is to wear it for a couple of days, recording the errors, and gradually tweaking.
    • @Jon The link is no longer working and I wanted to see that demonstration again. Is there any chance you can make it available again? I'd appreciate it!
    • Or, if you have a staking set or jewelling too, just use one of the stumps. You can choose a fine tip to fit inside a jewel if necessary.
    • Good morning,   To be honest, I'm not sure I trust my own logic anymore 😅. But here's a picture of my own (failed!) attempt to install a new rotor axle. I punched way to hard and even split the metal of the rotor. My thinking was that, in my case, the axle sits "deeper" in the rotor and hence the rotor would be closer to the movement plates. Vice versa, I was thinking that a very light punch could cause the rotor to sit rather high. But not sure that makes sense because in both cases, the flat part of the axle and the rotor align equally.     Sorry, but is he saying that the outside of the caseback has been polished to such an extent that the inside of the caseback has deformed/sunk??? That sounds crazy to me because those casebacks are thick! Can you see any signs of that on the inside of the caseback? Have you tried screwing in the caseback a litte bit more or less so that the supposedly "sunk" part of the caseback would move from 9 o'clock to e.g. 6/7 or 11/12 o'clock?  If the caseback is truly deformed, maybe it could be punched/pressed back into shape (e.g. with glass/caseback closing press).      I agree with your choice. But yea, Rolex makes it VERY hard for independent watchmakers to do a perfect job because we can't get (original) parts easily.      Your pictures aren't too bad. But still impossible to see if the rotor isn't perfectly flat. You'd have to look at it with your loupe, from the side (like the pictures), and turn the rotor to see if the gaps (with the automatic bridge plates) increase/decrease.     Finally... how is the up/down play of the rotor? To test, take a toothpick/pegwood and press on the small triangular side of the rotor next to the axle (NOT the big side where the weight is. But the opposite side.). Does that lift up the weight-side of the rotor? There can be some play, but it should really be minimal. If there's too much play, a new spring clip is the first thing to do. After that, one could play around with the jewels. This is too much:
×
×
  • Create New...