Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

hi guys, sold some stock so going to invest the proceeds, got a few items with hair spring probs that i've put off doing until i knew how to approach it now i've swotted up thro this site i'm ready to jump in but not before i've got some more advice from you guys.at the moment i'm using a 110mm probably about 2x lighted magnifyer but i'm really struggling with this so i would be most interested in what other people are using. i get on ok with what i have for every thing else so i dont mind having two systems for two different jobs. thanks guys

Posted

Hi Steve,

 

For general magnification, I use an Asco 4x loupe with a wire holder to keep in on my eye. It focuses at 2.5". For smaller work and inspection, I have an Asco 10x aplanatic loupe that focuses at about 1". If you get a 10x loupe I feel the aplanatic is worth the difference in price. The field of view is noticeably wider and there is less distortion.

 

The lamp I'm using now in an adjustable brightness/color temperature LED desk lamp. It's not as bright as I would like, but it does the job for now.

 

Don

Posted

Hi Steve,

I mainly use an Optivisor with 3.5X power at 4".  For me this combination works beautifully.  It is very, very comfortable and provides me with enough magnification given my age (approaching 50), astigmatism, etc. It originally came with 2X but found it was not enough.  I also use a 5X loupe and 10X hand lens for inspection work.  Here's a pic...

post-38-0-10462600-1423284355_thumb.jpg

This week I borrowed a stereo microscope from work to try out and have been amazed at what you can see which wasn't apparent with the loupe or hand lens.  I plan on buying one for inspection work.

post-38-0-86095300-1423284573_thumb.jpg

For lighting, I use this 3 lamp (fluorescent) unit.  I really like it, but it is the only one I have ever used.  Other members might be able to "shed more light on this" to point out other options for you to consider.

post-38-0-08686300-1423284782_thumb.jpg

I hope this helps!

Roger

 

Posted

thanks for the comments guys, i wont be able to use the visor as i wear glasses and i also have difficulty with loupes that attach to your glasses so i'm a bit stuck, i was hoping to get a desk mounted  magnifier at 5x or more with enough room underneath to get the tweezers working, alas the hairsprings will have to wait a bit longer, thanks, steve

Posted

Optivizors are fantastic. What they (definitely) lack in style they make up for in substance...

You can get a little clip on light for them, but the battery pack's extremely annoying.

Posted

Optivizors are fantastic. What they (definitely) lack in style they make up for in substance...

You can get a little clip on light for them, but the battery pack's extremely annoying.

Better if you have a light built in then?

Posted

It,s all about comfort I have a Optivisor with changeable lenses. However I only use it now & again with clocks i just find it too awkward for watches. I prefer different strength eye loupes at hand & my reading glasses are on a cord.

It,s a bit fiddly but it works for me. I have also found after lot of practice,I can look through a loupe but also look through my other eye when looking for a tool my bench.

Posted

Hi steve, you will find lots of good suggestions here and remember not everyone have "the same eyes" and comfort level.

 

My two cents: Not all eye magnification devices are for everyone. It has cost me a lot of money to actually find what I'm comfortable with...and it was an optivisor like cheapo Chinese thing most people won't wear! With that said, I'd say go for the best you can afford and if you can try first or return if not happy, better!

Posted

Hi,

   I thought I would throw my two cents in here. I wear glasses now and switch to contacts when I go to work. I've tried the optivisor with contacts but it just doesn't work for me. My contact prescription is set up so that my left eye is for reading and my right eye is for distance. I am also right eye dominant. What I find works best for me is a double clip on loupe for my glasses which I use on my right eye. The one I use most has a 3x and a 4x lens. I use the 3x most of the time but for close inspection I'll use both. Anything more than that I'll pull out a boom arm microscope which I find I like very much.

Charles K

Posted

As i said in previous post its about comfort & what suits you. I have tried a few of the clip on jobs but they always seem to fall off at the most inappropriate time.

It might be the way I attach them or my glasses but too any slips caused by them falling of at the wrong time.

Posted

hi guys, like to say thanks again for your advice, now the proud owner of an optivisor i got off the bay for £40 with a number 5 lense used thro my existing magnifier for hair spring work has worked a treat with a 100% 1 out of 1 success rate so farlooking good, thanks, stevepost-618-0-54253400-1424717101_thumb.jpgpost-618-0-54253400-1424717101_thumb.jpg

post-618-0-97900100-1424717121_thumb.jpg

  • 3 months later...
Posted

Hello Toptime,

 

Like everything else this largely depends upon how much is in your budget. 

 

The Optivisor style magnifyer which is hands free is favoured by a number of folk and the Bay has a number of different options on sale if you search the forums for "Comfortable magnification" you will come up with Al's thread and others but there are some links below, and a number of folk give opinions. 

In general you need something that keeps the magnification in place while you use both hands and I personally can only use Loupes by holding them in place with one hand so I purchased the spectacles with flip up loupes and use them for examinations.

3.5X Power at about 4 inches distance seems the optimum magnification and working space.  Its no use getting really good magnification if you can't work on the watch unless your requirement is inspection only.

A while ago for Christmas I got a Brunel stereo microscope which has changed everything for me and gives me working space and up to 70x magnification but I know that it may not be in everyones budget.

 

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/748-handy-clip-on-dual-loupe/?view=findpost&p=5843&hl=visor

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/947-comfortable-magnification/?hl=visor

http://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/337-brunels-entry-level-bm1-long-arm-microscope-review/

 

Hope this helps but further tracing under magnification etc will give more results.

 

Welcome to the Forum.

 

Cheers,

 

Vic

  • Like 1
Posted

I have been using Bausch & Lomb but broke my 5x one (a very sad story!!) so changed to a Bergeon screw rimmed style & I found a noticeable difference in clarity. 

Posted

I have been using Bausch & Lomb but broke my 5x one (a very sad story!!) so changed to a Bergeon screw rimmed style & I found a noticeable difference in clarity.

Better or worse?

Posted (edited)

Maybe It's just because I'm used to using eyeglasses but things like optivisors give me a headache. I've also noticed, large  lenses, like that in an optivisor or a magnifying lamp give a bit of 'chromatic aberration' (colours split so that everything has colorful outlines) that can be disorienting. 

I could imagine an optivosr would be excellent  for machine work, polishing or bench motors, lathes etc where they could have the dual function of eye protection and you can't afford to be fiddling with eyeglasses while you need two hands to work the piece/machine. 

But my preference for general watch work is a 3.3x screw rimmed Bergeon eye glass, good, clear optics and under £10  on cousins. I've never felt the need to have anything lower than a 3x but that might just be what I'm used to. For oiling pivots, jewels and other times when you need to really look at something, you want a decent 10, or 12x eyeglass, I don't yet have a suggestion for this I'm currently unhappy with the cheap one I have.

It's worth keeping in mind the higher magnification you go, the less focal length you generally get (you'll only be able to see clearly a small area, and that area can go in and out of focus if you don't keep the piece/yourself perfectly still) 

I've not found my self wanting more than 12x.

and if you're not used to using eyeglasses, there's nothing wrong with using one of the holders that keep it in place for you, useful to have anyway, I use it for the 12x work at least, just makes things a tad easier. 

Edited by Ishima
  • 10 months later...
Posted
On 15 April 2016 at 1:38 PM, aswatchmaking said:

Optivisors are not used by real watchmakers.

That's a rather unsubstantiated sweeping statement.

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, aswatchmaking said:

Optivisors are not used by real watchmakers. They are not for watchmaking. If you want to work on movements get a loupe and do it the right way. 

You're wrong here. If you are ok yourself losing the major benefit of bilateral vision, you're welcome. 

Posted

I think a 4x Optivisor is fabulous for most pocket watches. Also, I have an astigmatism so, being able to wear glasses under the Optivisor is a huge help. I also use a 10x/18x loupe that attaches to the temple of my glasses.

My feeling is you should use whatever works best for you.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello and welcome to the fo4um. Enjoy
    • Welcome to the forum, enjoy.
    • You're asking a pretty broad question and you didn't specify the machine but yes it's simple especially if you have the right machine. The question has problems but I'll take it as it is. Is it really that simple yes especially if you have the right machine. So in the video below he's making a screw and yes it really is that simple but pay attention to the machine it is not simple at all probably wasn't cheap but it is small it will probably fit in your garage. Unfortunately wouldn't fit in my garage as it's far too cluttered up with things. In the video he talks about making a screw and pay attention to the machine. The machine has lots and lots and lots of cutters and lots of things to do lots of machining all-in-one machine conceivably one step after another all programmable. If you look at his channel lots of CNC's stuff and there are several other videos related to this machine. He goes to the factory where they talk about it and show all the other machines they make in Switzerland.  I did look up the specifications the machine I don't recall the price it's not going to cut wheels I think it has a maximum diameter around 11 mm basically it's really good for making small diameter watch parts. Then in one of the other videos he goes to a factory that used to make parts with waterpowered machinery been in business for 100 years and everything they now make is made with CNC machines including this one. What was interesting with the factory photo was that when they make some parts they can put them on a optical comparator comparator compares with whatever the reference is and the machine can be programmed to adjust its cutting to make sure everything is actually being made to specifications. Oh and then somewhere in all of this there was at least one picture of a balance staff can't have a CNC Swiss machine without making balance staffs.   It would be really nice if we had pictures of the machine. Then yes if you look at the page for wheel cutting you can enter parameters and it will generate a G code but he left out things? Notice he has a picture of a complete wheel but the G code isn't making a complete wheel it's only cutting the gear teeth I don't see whereas the program for crossing out the spokes? Typically when you see people cutting gears once the teeth are cut most the time the spokes are cut by hand. Occasionally someone will mill them out but typically not with the program which seems strange if you have CNC capability for instance one of my friends fill it used to design assembly line equipment or things to make things. So his hobby was to continue to make tools to make things like clocks. Very interesting and clever clocks but his true fund was making the machines to make the clocks. Then machine is not controlled by G code like we would typically find today as the stepping motor controller he has was made a long time ago and the individual controllers used a textbased program. So the company had a editor you could write a program to cause each the stepping motors to do something. So basically once you figure out how to cut a gear he would just change the parameters for different size gears so here's an example of a gear as you can see we have the teeth and the spokes. Then we have a picture the machine which sucks because it would've been so much nicer if I could've taken a picture when it was cutting a gears so we can see things better. Then yes there is a worm gear stepping motor indexing this is a mini lathe and the indexing is at the end of the lathe head hiding. The basic operation of this machine would be brass sheet not cut to a specific diameter size not even round mounted on the machine. Then it turns and a milling cutter will cut the diameter. Then the gear would be cut with a gear cutter. The same mill cutter for the diameter although conceivably change the size I don't know but basically the same milling for cutting the outer diameter would be used to cut the spokes. I really can't remember how he did the center hole but whatever it was was very precise.          
    • Yeah I know the site and the creator of it.  the two video clips are good examples of the quicker method and a full tear down.  the quick method will work in many cases. But not always and not for all the different movements.  I strongly suggest to not bend the four tabs as was done in the first clip.  Instead there are three tabs that insert into the top plate, Much saver way as to not break a tab.
    • I found a motor that is 3/4 hp and another that is 1.2hp. They come with speed controller. So I don’t think I would need a wiring diagram. But I sure appreciate you offering your help! Do you think 1.2 hp would be too much for a watchmaker’s lathe?
×
×
  • Create New...