Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, noirrac1j said:

Bulova made some funky watches in the 70's...Nice!

thanks guys. this is the jet star. i've seen them with red on the hands, too. but always with the blue painted bezel.

bulova was NOT afraid to go out on the limb design-wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just finished servicing this Angelus Alarm watch that was given to me by a seller at the local swap meet . It has an AS 1475 movement that is used in other Swiss watches and is cloned in Russian Poljot watches with Cal. 2612.1

DSC00004.JPG

DSC00001.JPG

 

I found the Angelus watch movement interesting to work on so I got this Poljot at a pretty good "Make Offer " price .

Actually , all the Russian Alarm watches were very reasonable ,...but if course their movements are not as finished looking as the AS 1475 .

Screen shot 2017-01-22 at 3.09.27 PM.png

Screen shot 2017-01-22 at 3.09.38 PM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few days ago I received a little package from Vilnius, Lithuania containing the Luch 3055 I'd ordered a few days prior. This is one of the electro-mechanical "hybrid" movements, and I was fortunate enough to find one on Etsy that's pretty near pristine - photo below. This has become one of my favorite watches. It's a nice chunky one - looks chunkier on my skinny wrist - and I very much like the styling. If you've never sampled one of these, they're a very interesting model. The beat rate is very fast, probably something near 8 or 10 beats per second. The movement has a balance, but is driven electronically vs. with a mainspring. I think I'll be wearing this one a lot.  :-)

Gryf

luch_2.jpg

Edited by Gryf
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revisiting the Luch I mentioned above, here's a better shot showing its size... it isn't really as huge as it appears in the previous photo, and I swapped the strap out for a more modest one that I feel suits it better. Here's a pic of the movement as well.

Gryf

 

20170201_192018.jpg

20170201_194925.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today I'm wearing my , " nobody likes this watch but me " watch .  I've shown the sellers pics to a few people with less then enthusiastic responses . 

Oh well ,...I like it .

I cleaned the case , serviced the movement , and installed a new and very comfortable watch band yesterday .

Here's my kinda thin vintage Enicar handwind......

 

58963ed87a7b4_Screenshot2017-02-04at10_43_38AM.thumb.png.eac06c3bd844e8648e3fb637405b3fae.png

58963eef39c23_Screenshot2017-02-04at10_44_36AM.png.450e3d719373c2d73a99bc13dbe8af53.png

58963f1ac778e_Screenshot2017-02-04at10_44_50AM.png.fbc50b19257aefd2e1306cf5c45715a9.png

DSC00003.thumb.JPG.e52387ebabe7dfacc9047118d3f4be0e.JPG

DSC00007.thumb.JPG.6313e6411bc6de10b4de1bdc79b34e14.JPG

DSC00005.thumb.JPG.6cd70fb847050f58dc357721279089af.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys,

Wearing a Citizen V2 today... this version has 23 jewels but it was also available with 21 or 25 jewels.

Hacking but with Japanese only day-wheel. Quickset on date via the crown at the first stop. Still has its original 'C' crown. 002xxx serial number puts the production date in Feb 1970.

Citizen Autos from the 70s-80s are not really appreciated enough IMO..the ubiquitous 82xx series is as common as chips and Citizen's weird styling during the 80s do not attract as many admirers as the Seiko models from the same period. The eagle series are just too odd. Nonetheless the earlier models have decent enough styling and the movements are well constructed. I particularly like the 'Crystal Seven' and 'V2" series.

Here's some pics....replacement crystal, dial a bit discolored around the edges of the upper half.

P_20170203_205148.thumb.jpg.8120c34049b33226f2572c1d11c7a9e6.jpg

The current strap is 'cheap' (sellers pic)..

Screenshot_2017-02-03-22-28-45.thumb.jpg.f064e0f10ddf794a0068e9378752f24b.jpg

Original crown, sides have been lightly polished.

FB_IMG_1486132144133.thumb.jpg.45fd6c7cf3fcdb6969163ba07993f4a7.jpg

Movement is clean.

FB_IMG_1486132151981.thumb.jpg.5dedb2e1b520a09901e67dfd3eb37897.jpg

Caseback

P_20170203_224227_1.thumb.jpg.d0771fe2aaf826e6ba6adbb92662daeb.jpg

Happy Monday!

Anil

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, anilv said:

Hi guys,

Wearing a Citizen V2 today... this version has 23 jewels but it was also available with 21 or 25 jewels.

Hacking but with Japanese only day-wheel. Quickset on date via the crown at the first stop. Still has its original 'C' crown. 002xxx serial number puts the production date in Feb 1970.

Citizen Autos from the 70s-80s are not really appreciated enough IMO..the ubiquitous 82xx series is as common as chips and Citizen's weird styling during the 80s do not attract as many admirers as the Seiko models from the same period. The eagle series are just too odd. Nonetheless the earlier models have decent enough styling and the movements are well constructed. I particularly like the 'Crystal Seven' and 'V2" series.

Here's some pics....replacement crystal, dial a bit discolored around the edges of the upper half.

P_20170203_205148.thumb.jpg.8120c34049b33226f2572c1d11c7a9e6.jpg

The current strap is 'cheap' (sellers pic)..

Screenshot_2017-02-03-22-28-45.thumb.jpg.f064e0f10ddf794a0068e9378752f24b.jpg

Original crown, sides have been lightly polished.

FB_IMG_1486132144133.thumb.jpg.45fd6c7cf3fcdb6969163ba07993f4a7.jpg

Movement is clean.

FB_IMG_1486132151981.thumb.jpg.5dedb2e1b520a09901e67dfd3eb37897.jpg

Caseback

P_20170203_224227_1.thumb.jpg.d0771fe2aaf826e6ba6adbb92662daeb.jpg

Happy Monday!

Anil

Very nice Anil , I agree about the Eagle series. Not as appealing as some of the other models . I like and have a few V2's , Crystal Sevens , and Homers .

I just bought this Citizen "Leader Student" watch on ebay that one of the members from the Seiko Citizen Watch Forum had up for auction . It is a JDM watch and comes on an AM  Beads of Rice watchband from Japan by manufacture "Bambi " .

58980548ef295_Screenshot2017-02-05at7_07_34PM.thumb.png.c8071fa89ff2bf71e3d9a2c10e87d2e2.png

5898056b5cb28_Screenshot2017-02-05at7_07_52PM.png.b75cc8387ede0c5c460045dc2a7018d1.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar. 
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...