Jump to content

Poljot 3133 chronograph


GeorgeClarkson

Recommended Posts

Maybe its me, bit I haven't seen poljot chronographs posted in this forum. Is there a reason for this? I have a near NOS and just got me for X-mas from Russia another one to restore... The Poljot 3133 is the 'copy' of the Valjoux 7734 movement, actually built with the machines Valjoux sold to Russia, a bit improved in some aspects, but rougher finishing. Any Poljot lovers out there?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GeorgeClarkson said:

Maybe its me, bit I haven't seen poljot chronographs posted in this forum. Is there a reason for this? I have a near NOS and just got me for X-mas from Russia another one to restore... The Poljot 3133 is the 'copy' of the Valjoux 7734 movement, actually built with the machines Valjoux sold to Russia, a bit improved in some aspects, but rougher finishing. Any Poljot lovers out there?

I like those Poljots too and am hoping to add one to my collection soon.  I've had my eye out for a Zeppelin LZ 127, which isn't actually a Poljot but uses the 3133 movement.

hrs_zeppelin3.jpg

Interestingly, I believe the 3133 is a derivative of the Valjoux 7734 which traces it's roots back to the Venus 188.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Geo actually the parts are no problem, since here in Germany there is plenty of. The real problem is getting them at fair prices... but that's another story altogether.

@RyMoeller:  That is a very nice watch! Yes it uses the 3133 movement from Poljot which as I said in my opening post was built using the designs and machines from Valjoux, which the russians bought from the Swiss manufacturer. They did improve the design a bit, but the overall finish is rougher.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2016 at 3:12 AM, RyMoeller said:

  I've had my eye out for a Zeppelin LZ 127, which isn't actually a Poljot but uses the 3133 movement.

hrs_zeppelin3.jpg

 

you had to go and show a zeppelin. man! i love their designs. i keep looking at these on a regular basis. it's on my (ever growing) list. i didn't know who's movement was used in this watch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ops, I did it again.....

I just won another Poljot 3133, a Sturmanskie at that... and also this one is not working... Guess I will have plenty of work to do!

I am getting the fix on these...

Pictures from the seller are pretty good and the condition is, apparently, pretty good, judging from them. I only hope the problem is easy to resolve...

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_2.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_4.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_1.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, frenchie said:

Looks good... except for the hairspring that looks a little bit bent out of shape.

Yes you are right, and this is not the only issue apparently. I also noticed that the dial looks "strange"... Hope I can find pictures of an original, untouched Sturmanskie to compare.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to some research I made and forum posts I found on watchuseek, there should be nothing bad about the dial nor the entire watch I bought. Actually, it appears to be one of the earliest models, from the first half of the 80s. On watchuseek.com I found the graph below. The Sturmanskie black and white logo, like the one I got, is no.7

I also attached another image of an identical watch, also found on the same thread over at watchuseek.com

80sDials.jpg

mid_80s.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at that balance bridge screw, I don't think you will have been the first one to have been under the bridge before, it seems a bit proud but I have never worked on one of these and maybe it's meant to look like that.
Cheers, Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Geo said:

Is that a hacking lever sitting on the top edge of the balance wheel?  If it is, no wonder it's not running.

Don't think that's a hacking lever, looks more like the rather badly deformed terminal curve of the H/S between the stud and the regulator.

Quite common damage when someone who doesn't know what they are doing plays with the regulator, moves it all the way to the fastest position so that the regulator goes beyond the dogleg to the terminal curve, then moves it back again. The dogleg gets jammed between the regulator pins ans as a result, it gets dragged round causing the H/S to buckle out between the regulator and the stud, pulling the rest of the H/S out of true and stopping the watch.

Provided it's not been too badly b*ggered it's a relatively easy fix and the watch is back to running condition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Vich said:

Looking at that balance bridge screw, I don't think you will have been the first one to have been under the bridge before, it seems a bit proud but I have never worked on one of these and maybe it's meant to look like that.
Cheers, Vic

It does look a bit proud to me too, Vich. These pictures are the sellers, I still did not receive the watch myself, so please wait till I update this post with my findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Marc said:

Don't think that's a hacking lever, looks more like the rather badly deformed terminal curve of the H/S between the stud and the regulator.

Quite common damage when someone who doesn't know what they are doing plays with the regulator, moves it all the way to the fastest position so that the regulator goes beyond the dogleg to the terminal curve, then moves it back again. The dogleg gets jammed between the regulator pins ans as a result, it gets dragged round causing the H/S to buckle out between the regulator and the stud, pulling the rest of the H/S out of true and stopping the watch.

Provided it's not been too badly b*ggered it's a relatively easy fix and the watch is back to running condition.

This is also my line of thought. I analyzed the pictures of the seller, and it does appear to be exactly like you wrote. Hope we are not both wrong on this, which seems a pretty easy fix to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I mentioned in one of my replies, there are other issues to this watch, apart the bet HS or just the need for a nice clean and service.

Check the picture here enclosed. Is it me, or this looks like a bad redial? If so, apparently I must be more careful with my purchases, since this would be the second time....

Clearly from the pictures attached, the seconds and minutes markers ring is offset in relation to the hour markers...

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_12.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_11.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...