Jump to content

Ordering From Cousins


Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, Ishima said:

For clarification, i wasn't attempting to say that cousins were bad, and I'm not sure anyone else was, i still order from them weekly and seldom order elsewhere, no plans on changing that, perfection isn't a reasonable expectation. 

So you haven't told them of the problem? They have corrected all and any issue I've presented, even took back a cheap bracelet for my wrong order, something they weren't bound to do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ishima said:

I'm not sure how you expect them to correct the problem unless they have a time machine. Other than that, they're surely fully aware of that hickup in their stock. 

As mentioned above, they will refund or replace. They would not sent wrong parts knowingly, and you would avoid others having the same problem, it takes few seconds form the "help & support" section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in the midst of communications with Cousins on the end-stone. I sent them an image of the part supplied next to the engraved caliber number on the pillar-plate. Once I realized that the part supplied, 1193330, has a number made up of the caliber #, plus the generic part designation, I searched for an AS1240330. Something came up on Ebay of parts being sold as parts for an AS1240. One of those parts was an end-stone with the #330. I would think that this would be what I was looking for. Lo and behold, the image of it was the image of the type supplied by Cousins. That said, it certainly isn't the design that I have seen used on AS1240's here in the US. Maybe they are different than what's in Europe and the UK? Or perhaps this Ebay seller is selling a part for an AS1193 as one for a 1240?  Vintage watch parts can be a real challenge.

I'll attach the same image I sent to Cousins so you can see what I'm talking about. What I need is another of the oblong type end-stones in frame/setting. You can see that the one at the bottom is missing. Cheers.

DSC06050_2.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cousins reviewed my situation, verified that their data table did show that this part was interchangeable between the AS1240 and AS1193. They were therefore kind enough to issue a refund. I feel for them, as I know how difficult is must be to keep such things 100% accurate. And again, mine may be an export variant that was used in the US and not the UK. Case closed. All's well that ends well.

All in all, this was a good experience. Thanks, Cousins, UK. Cheers.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I found out yesterday that the upper end-stone from an AS 1194 will work as a lower end-stone for the AS1240. I spun the wheel and ordered it as a parts movement in the hopes that it would work. The jewel itself is a bit larger in the 11 1/2 ligne 1194, but the setting fits in the recess in the AS1240, and the distance to the screw keeps the flat end-stone where it needs to be. The lower end-stones of the AS1187/1194 (Movement is actually marked just like that, with two caliber numbers.) are of the round style that Cousins supplied in the above-mentioned order.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have dealt with Cousins quite a lot, I am in Australia and there are no suppliers of watch parts here so I have to shop OS, I general my dealings with them have been positive, except for one instance, I ordered a balance complete for a Seiko I think, when it arrived packed in a little plastic box bound up with sticky tape, I didn't even have to unpack it to see I had a problem.

kA5gLN3.jpg

I have never seen a balance packaged as badly as this and I still have it to day still cocooned in its box and sticky tape.

When I contacted Cousins this is the response I got .

GeAqy8u.jpg

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ausimax said:

 I ordered a balance complete for a Seiko I think, when it arrived packed in a little plastic box bound up with sticky tape, I didn't even have to unpack it to see I had a problem.

I don't know which balance is this but all the Seiko balance complete I've ordered from Cousins had excellent packaging, very tightly sealed box. Regarding items that got damaged or lost because of poor packaging, I had this issue once and they refunded with no problem. If you have a similar issue with Cousins I recommend you call'em on the phone (about 1c per minute with Skype), and if still denied, when it's worth, open a claim with your C/C card issuer.

P2110349.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't be certain it was Seiko, this was over a year ago, but in any case it was negligent packaging, that is one of my main bitches with Cousins is communications, the web site like all automated complaint handling system covers every situation but yours, and no eMail address.

I wrote them a letter protesting their decision which they failed to answer, and you have little comeback because of the terms of sale you have to agree to to have your order accepted. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ausimax said:

I can't be certain it was Seiko, this was over a year ago, but in any case it was negligent packaging, that is one of my main bitches with Cousins is communications, the web site like all automated complaint handling system covers every situation but yours, and no eMail address.

I wrote them a letter protesting their decision which they failed to answer, and you have little comeback because of the terms of sale you have to agree to to have your order accepted. 

I can't agree with you because from my personal experience they took the utmost care about every single issue (all quite trivial) I presented through the "support request", and once on the telephone.

I doubt very much that they can set terms for which they charge for faulty or poorly packaged items,  so you really should have brought it to your card issuer and let the claims department sort it out. Another thing which could have been done, even at the same time, was to file a complain with Trading Standards office. 
https://www.gov.uk/find-local-trading-standards-office

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Hi,

I wanted to get some parts/tools from cousins but when I go to sign up it asks to confirm I'm buying for the trade and the registration process wants a VAT number.  I don't have a company and so it seems that I can't use Cousins for this reason.

Have anybody bought items from cousins as private individual rather than a company?

 Cheers

James

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I signed up about 3 years ago, and as a private individual spend between £300-£500 a year with them this has mainly been parts but also some tools that I have needed.

When signing up just try and leave the VAT number blank not all traders are vat registered because its dependent on turn over.

There are also alternative suppliers you can sign up for I bought my Dumont tweezers from Hswalsh and my Horotec screwdrivers from Eternal tools both cheaper than Cousins at the time.

Also take a look at the parts and tools suppliers section of this web site you may find what you need from the suppliers listed there.

Edited by wls1971
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm a private individual and from outside the UK. I order without any problems.

I don't remember what the registration panel looked like but I only wrote what was necessary. It's possible that the VAT thing might be optional as stated. I don't remember writing one down. They already charge you VAT that gets added to the price at the end, anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, James202010 said:

Hi,

I wanted to get some parts/tools from cousins but when I go to sign up it asks to confirm I'm buying for the trade and the registration process wants a VAT number.  I don't have a company and so it seems that I can't use Cousins for this reason.

Have anybody bought items from cousins as private individual rather than a company?

 Cheers

James

Had account with cousins for many years as a private individual with no problems encountered. Not sure why they are asking if you are trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Having to say you're a company means they can side step The Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013. (The Consumer Contracts [Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges] Regulations that apply to sales of goods or services to consumers without face-to-face contact and replaced the former Distance Selling Regulations.) Naughty really.

Edited by p2n
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, p2n said:

Having to say you're a company means they can side step The Consumer Contracts Regulations 2013. (The Consumer Contracts [Information, Cancellation and Additional Charges] Regulations that apply to sales of goods or services to consumers without face-to-face contact and replaced the former Distance Selling Regulations.) Naughty really.

Actually we should be grateful to Cousins to sell to individuals as they perfectly know that many buyers are. The acceptance of a business trade regulations prevents them dealing with many  problems that would arise from sellers as if selling shoes online, and I'm happy if it helps their business continuity.. However, notwithstanding the formal rule in the past they have refunded myself for defective parts or even items ordered in error.
Also you may want to check the ongoing court case(s) Cousins have started against the restrictive business practices by the Swiss makers. Thank you for that too Cousins.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
    • Has it got a beat adjustment on the platform or is it a fixed hairspring? in short what you are looking at to get it just about in beat is to get the roller jewel sitting dead centre between the banking pins. So remove the platform and take of the pallet fork and escape wheel to give you clear line of site, sit the platform with the balance in place and with it level look between the banking pins and see if the roller jewel is sitting between them, if it is nice and central its there or there abouts in beat, if its not the the position of the pinned end of the hairspring needs to be adjusted to move the roller jewel into the correct position, thats why I asked if it has an adjustment on the platform or not, if it has its an easier job. 
    • I've managed to adjust it. I'm going to try and explain it as well as I can with my limited horology knowledge but I hope it helps someone in the future. There is a cam to the right of the front plate as shown in the picture. As the clock ticks along, the pin indicated in the gear comes around and slots into one of the silencer cam gaps, turning the cam. The pin completes a full rotation in 2 hours. To adjust the cam to start at the right time set the clock to just before 7. I did 6:45. Then I turned the silencer cam anticlockwise, which spins freely, until it pushed the silencer lever up and was placed just before the drop. Just before the 7AM indicated in the picture. All I then had to do was progress the hands to 7-7:15which made the pin slot into the silencer cam gap and turn the cam so the lever comes down again, unsilencing the clock. That was it. If anyone comes across this issue again I'd be happy to assist. Thanks again to everyone that helped. Hey Transporter! Thanks a lot for the reply. That was a really good explanation and I'm sure it would have made my troubleshooting a lot less painful haha. I'm sure someone will find it useful in the future. Thank you again for taking the time to try and help me out with this.
    • Now I'm completely confused, it would appear that the epilame  is oleophobic  as @Marc states: This oleophobic  behavior can be seen as beading of the droplet (as above) which stops the oil spreading which is supported by what we observe on treated/untreated cap stones (for example), but as @VWatchie states this should make the drops more mobile and is supported by the literature:   A review on control of droplet motion based on wettability modulation principles design strategies recent progress and applications.pdf   However the hole point is that we have less mobile oil so an oleophobic  would see to be the opposite of what we want. In fact this beading and high mobility are desirable properties in things like smart phone covers, see below.  I am fairly sure that epilame doesn't make the droplets more mobile, so maybe its a strange coating with dual properties that are both oleophobic (beading) and cohesive/adhesive resulting in low mobility?? This may explain the high price??  
    • The description there is exactly how it's done, and it's very well written!
×
×
  • Create New...