Jump to content

Need help with used Bergeon Platax tool No. 2677


VWatchie

Recommended Posts

Platax01.jpg.5aa09091de7de1fd813725e67f3aa21a.jpg
These are the two punches (0.1 and 0.15 mm) used to put force onto the balance staff to remove the roller and to drive out the balance staff. For anyone not familiar with the Platax tool here’s an excellent video of its use.

Platax02.jpg.34135c36d4e74cf7abebf2b92a788148.jpg
As you can see, the two holes/grooves in the punches are clogged, and I wonder if anyone knows if this is by design or because they have been clogged by broken off balance staff pivots?

Platax03.jpg.4e14a74b50fe9c7e182957bcac9c4f8d.jpg
Unlike the Platax punches, these roller remover punches from Bergeon’s dedicated roller remover tool No. 30070 have extraction holes so that any broken off pivots can be removed.

What suggests that the Platax punches are clogged by design is that they lack these pivot extraction holes. What speaks against this theory is that the clogged Platax punches will inevitably bend or break the pivots instead of putting the force onto the cone of the staff. One could argue that it really doesn’t matter much but putting force on the cones gives a better and more controlled distribution of the force. Also, why have two punches (0.10 and 0.15) when both will have the same effect, that is, bend or break the pivot?

My guess is that the Platax punches have been clogged by broken off pivots, but that clearing them would be extremely difficult and not worthwhile as the tool can still be used.

BTW, in the video I linked too @Markmentions that if enough people would show interest in a Platax tool video tutorial he could make one. I believe several comments expressed such an interest, including me, so when and if you have the time for it Mark, it would be much appreciated!

Edited by VWatchie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This might be a daft suggestion, but... 

Maybe try heating the punch to expand the metal then dip the end in water to try and free the remainder of the staff?

If the remainder of the staff cools quicker than the punch, it might just free it. At least that's my guess, I've never tried it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your suggestions, but I think I'll try to snap off or file down the pivot (unless it's already broken) before I punch out the staff. It should give a larger area for the punch. To bad the punches for the dedicated roller remover tool doesn't fit the Platax tool. Anyway I'll be using the dedicated roller remover tool to remove the roller rather than the Platax. Let me know what you think!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi, I was pointing to the next-to-last post with the microscope view.

It shows why punching from the rivet side - with or without removed rivet - will widen = damage the hole. The staff was already distorted to taper shape by rivetting. This widened part will be forced through the hole then.

All pros that I know and appreciate will remove the hub by those reasons.

Frank

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, VWatchie said:

Thanks for your suggestions, but I think I'll try to snap off or file down the pivot (unless it's already broken) before I punch out the staff. It should give a larger area for the punch. To bad the punches for the dedicated roller remover tool doesn't fit the Platax tool. Anyway I'll be using the dedicated roller remover tool to remove the roller rather than the Platax. Let me know what you think!

I own a Platax tool and when used I only apply the lightest taps to remove, if it shows no sign of removing then I cut the majority of the balance rim away with my lathe before finally tapping out with the platax. Some Staffs seem to be made of real strong metal and I type with experience these vintage staffs if punched out it widens or distorts the hole. The key is what ever method is used the balance must not be distorted in any way.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have very limited experience and have only used the Platax tool to remove staffs from modern (< 70 years old) wrist watches. It has worked well and the staffs have come out with very little force. The biggest risk is if you don't know how to use the Platax tool properly. You must, of course, make sure punch never reaches the hole in the balance. BTW, doesn't the hole in balance wheel also become wider and wider as we punch in new staffs? Perhaps modern balance metal can both expand and retract? Yes, that seems to be an insane idea, but nothing surprises me and I'm certainly not a metallurgist.

Come to think of it, jewels are wider than the jewel holes, but still we can replace a jewel several times, perhaps even indefinitely(?) without widening the jewel hole? Or maybe not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

I have very limited experience and have only used the Platax tool to remove staffs from modern (< 70 years old) wrist watches. It has worked well and the staffs have come out with very little force. The biggest risk is if you don't know how to use the Platax tool properly. You must, of course, make sure punch never reaches the hole in the balance. BTW, doesn't the hole in balance wheel also become wider and wider as we punch in new staffs? Perhaps modern balance metal can both expand and retract? Yes, that seems to be an insane idea, but nothing surprises me and I'm certainly not a metallurgist.

Come to think of it, jewels are wider than the jewel holes, but still we can replace a jewel several times, perhaps even indefinitely(?) without widening the jewel hole? Or maybe not...

Good points indeed. All I know I changed a vintage balance a few years ago using the Platax and when fitting the new balance it was too loose to rivet.
There was a very good article a few years ago in the BHI mag with regard to punching out staffs and an example was given changing a vintage Rolex staff. The guy who summited the article informed that these staffs used metal that in his experience had to be annealed before cutting the rivet and showed how to anneal without damaging the balance. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's always a risk of opening the hole in the balance when punching out a staff. On a hard steel balance (bimetallic) or a Glucydur there's a smaller risk of enlarging it too much, with softer nickel balances it's pretty sure the new staff will be quite loose. Supposing you manage to get the new staff riveted, there's no assurance that the staff is centered in the enlarged hole, so you'll have to spend more time poising- which on many balances means removing metal with no means of adding.

 

The K&D staff removing accessory for staking tools and the Platax do ensure that the balance isn't distorted when punching out a staff. The Platax is particularly useful for dismantling assemblies where you need support between two parts. But I'm with Frank on removing the hub. Or, if the balance is Glucydur or nickel you can soak it in alum for a few hours.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

Or, if the balance is Glucydur or nickel you can soak it in alum for a few hours.

That sounds like a super safe method, thanks! Is there any easy method to determine what type of alloy a balance is made of? What other alloys are balances (usually) made of?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, VWatchie said:

That sounds like a super safe method, thanks! Is there any easy method to determine what type of alloy a balance is made of? What other alloys are balances (usually) made of?

They are pretty much bimetallic (brass and steel), Glucydur (which is hardened beryllium copper), or nickel alloy. If you aren't sure, check with a magnet, as long as the balance isn't ferric it's OK. There can be some discoloration of the balance at times but it seems to clean up with normal watch cleaning solutions.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

I have made Platax punches from silver steel. The only trick worth passing on is that to drill the hole the best method is to start with a centre tool and then use an end mill of the appropriate size. Curiously they drill much faster than a twist drill and are available from https://drillbitsunlimited.com/Default.aspx

Incidentally, Matk Lovick had a video of the use of a Platax to replace the balance staff of a vintage Cyma watch. The title was 'Fitting a new balance staff to a vintage Cyma www mitary watch' It can be found with a google search.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

So I have a Platax tool with the exact same problem, clogged punches.  I bought some drill bits but the smallest set I found was still too large to drill out the broken pivot.  Has anyone been able to unclog these?  I have some Vissin that I could try, but I'd be worried about damage to the punch.  I may consider heating as well.  Perhaps this is why the tool is no longer made.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, pent said:

Perhaps this is why the tool is no longer made.

The problem with that theory is in other words this is a defective tool where is the replacement tool?

Reality is it's no longer made because it's no longer needed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Reality is it's no longer made because it's no longer needed.

Has been replaced with what, or balance staffs are no longer being replaced by professionals but instead the entire balance complete is replaced?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
    • There are some parts on Ebay for the seiko 6020A, it may just be a waiting game for someone to strip one down, NOS will be more scarce . K would strip your movement down to the module then start looking at other seiko movement to see if that coil is used, then seek out a seiko part dealer. Also Retrowatches youtube owner Mike may give you some advice try him on his site . He also hangs around amateur watchmaking groups.
    • I would agree, in order to work harden something you need to exceed it's yield strength when it moves from the elastic zone to the plastic zone and you get permanent deformation and work hardening which is fairly close to its failure point, relatively speaking and dependent on the material/alloy of course. In theory you can load something constantly within its elastic range and not suffer work hardening issues.
×
×
  • Create New...