Jump to content

BHI 2018 Examinations


Recommended Posts

Was anyone else up at Upton Hall this week for their exams?

I sat the D4 Quartz Servicing exam and also the D1 Watch And Clock Theory exam. 

I couldn’t get the case suitably waterprooofed for the quartz exam which I blame on the shoddy case/pendant tube and new crown provided. Otherwise, I got the current consumption right down and the movement built nicely.

I ran out of time during the theory exam. And that was me going at full speed, obviously. I think I spent too much time drawing keyless works, just because I am so familiar with them. 

Roddy

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congratulations on your achievement.

I’m not a great believer of these types of exams. From previous posts, I have made about exams.  Having to draw a keyless work, what is the point? Repairing a few that, will be stamped into your brain that will give you enough experience to be able to take apart and repair.  I might be bias as I learned by hands on gaining experience from my master teaching me and watching him. Nothing like getting your hands dirty. The same goes for books reading how to take a watch or clock apart wont go into what could go wrong.   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good effort to the pair of you,  im afraid the cost of joining the bhi the distance learning course and cost of exams and feed back have stopped me from proceeding onto becoming qualified, also I wouldn't be giving up my ful, time job as watch repair just wouldn't bring in the money for paying those bills.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, oli said:

Hi Roddy, I was there (Olivier), it was nice meeting you, I did not realise you were on the forum!

Hi Olivier! I was going to email you about the mechanical watch exams. Hope they went well. 

@oldhippy, regarding the exam format, I used to agree with what you are saying, ie. all you need is to learn on the job, and if you can “do it” then that proves that you know it. 

However, I’ve changed my mind after completing the BHI courses. The theory exam uses various methods to prove that you understand from first principles how everything works. It’s the only simple means that they have of determining that you really understand an aspect in depth. So for example, they ask you to explain via diagrams and text how the drive is delivered from the crown to the winding pinion. Some people will make the mistake of thinking that the stem directly drives the winding pinion for example. All of the theory behind metallurgy I’ve learned  through the course syllabus, and it’s just not something that I’ve learned through experience. I notice that many people on this forum know little about the subject - eg. the correct carbon content and temper for a wristwatch screw.

A few of us “watchies” struggled more with the clock theory questions. And we realised that it would have been much easier if we’d spent more time physically working on them. So that in itself proves that working on the job helps to aid your understanding of theory. Or alternatively, your understanding of theory proves that you’ve worked on the job.....

I think one of the best things about the BHI is that they set a benchmark for the standard of work which watchmakers provide. I’m not saying that anyone who posts here is a “bodger”, but we’ve all opened up enough watches which have been mucked about with by other watchmakers. The practical exams let you prove that you can work to a certain standard, and the theory exams reinforce that by showing that you understand how it works underneath.

For me at least, I know that my watchmaking (and clockmaking) skills have improved massively since studying the Theory and Practical courses, and I suppose that’s the main thing that matters for me. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...

Hi everybody.

I was at the D1 theory exam this year (2018)

I have this morning found out my result which was a fail (42%) and to say I am devastated is an understatement. I wish the exam wasn't biased towards clocks but that's life I guess.

Roddy I believe you're the chap who was stood in the common room before the Theory exam as you were telling the guys about your experience with the case/pendant? A pilot was talking to you if I'm not mistaken.

I'd be interested to know your theory result as you said you didn't finish. I finished with literally 2 minutes to spare and that was going flat out! Too many drawings, narratives and calculations for the time allocated I believe. Surely this year the pass rate would be lower than average?

Kyle

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel your pain, although I have been taking night classes for 2 1/2 years on watch and clock repair I'm pretty sure I wouldn't pass any of the BHI exams, but one day would love to  do the BHI course, I hope you manage to pass it next time you sit it.

Any chance you could give just a brief overview of what was in the test?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...
On 8/16/2018 at 2:54 PM, KyleP88 said:

Roddy I believe you're the chap who was stood in the common room before the Theory exam as you were telling the guys about your experience with the case/pendant? A pilot was talking to you if I'm not mistaken.

I'd be interested to know your theory result as you said you didn't finish. I finished with literally 2 minutes to spare and that was going flat out! Too many drawings, narratives and calculations for the time allocated I believe. Surely this year the pass rate would be lower than average?

Hi Kyle,

That was indeed me. I had a quartz watch to service with a really ropey pendant tube which was off-centre and wasn't waterproof when fitted with the crummy spare crowns which they provided!

I thought I would have failed the D1 Theory, but somehow managed to get seventy-something percent. Which is strange because I missed the entire recoil escapement drawings questions (not enough time) and misinterpreted one of the longer questions (how to make a screw?). I guess what I did write was probably of a reasonable quality. I still know more about watches than clocks though.

If you need any advice for the next time you sit the exam then just ask. I know some of the other guys who were at he same exam didn't pass, so the pass rate probably isnt that great.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
×
×
  • Create New...