Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I thought I'd break this out as a separate narrative from the Pierce Navigator repair I posted here.  Anyone who has done an old chronograph repair is aware of how delicate part 8270 (minute recording jumper) is.  The Pierce 134 movement is put together quite a bit differently from your normal chronograph in that it has a vertical clutch arrangement as opposed to the laterally engaged coupling clutch found in the more common Venus and Valjoux chronograph movements.  As a result of this uniqueness many parts, while functionally the same, are designed in a wholly different way.

The Pierce minute recording jumper (pawl) is different from the typical jumper piece in that it is not a spring, but rather a pivoting lever which is held in tension by the thinest of wires.

58b31af569bbf_Screenshot2017-02-2610_13_41.png.c2041b096af4263c95ef65001023e768.png

The wire needs to be manipulated in to put the jumper under just enough tension to hold the minute register wheel static until activated by the intermediate wheel.  Too much tension will cause the watch to stop when the elapsed minutes are recorded, and too little tension will allow the minute register wheel to spin freely.

Unfortunately it is not uncommon for the wire providing tension to fail after manipulation.  Here I have a jumper in which the wire has broken and the jewel (well, actually it's just a cut piece of steel) has come lose.

58b31c3595abd_IMG_2443(2).thumb.jpg.659e45086cdb83afb64c371dfb284dba.jpg

Initially I though it would be a simple fix to replace the broken wire.  I used some 18 gauge electrical wire which was composed of several strands of thinner copper wire.  Stripping the insulation off, I took a single strand of the copper wire and assumed it would suffice.  Under the microscope it was evident that this approach wouldn't work.  Even the smallest copper wire I could find was several times thicker than the wire I needed.

Using the bench micrometer I measured the thickness of the broken wire at 0.05mm.  To give an idea of how thin this is, I snapped a picture under the microscope of the wire next to a human hair.  The wire is on top, the hair on the bottom.

IMG_2450.thumb.JPG.0ebb95d14be1a7930f45428c5bc61a4b.JPG

Armed with hard data I was ready to take a second shot at the challenge.  Using the internets I found a company in the UK which could supply nickel wire in the same thickness.  I placed an order, then added a couple spools of varying thickness just in case (and to make the product to shipping cost ratio a bit more reasonable).

The wire arrived in due course and was exactly as described.

IMG_2454.thumb.JPG.864b5e0b0a46971dd0e2cff7b1ca7736.JPG

IMG_2458.thumb.JPG.452036298e95a28725a16c66f6a043fc.JPG

I began my repair by knocking out the brass pin which secured the old broken wire to the pawl.  A sewing needled was used to knock the pin out.

IMG_2448.thumb.JPG.bebc0f0bd01dfa05ce2fb1b85a9201e1.JPG

The "jewel" was then replaced using a bit of shellac and a alcohol lamp.

IMG_2459.thumb.JPG.bb935dfd97621a52fd84004fe4234b87.JPG

Now it was time to replace the spring wire.  I cut a length from the spool and threaded it through the eye piece on the jumper.  Naturally this was done under a microscope.

IMG_2460.thumb.JPG.b5bcaed19e847ea774daa147a168b798.JPG

A replacement pin was inserted to hold the wire in place and the excess was trimmed off using the scissors on my Swiss army knife (they seemed to be the perfect tool for this job).

As you can see had two jumpers to repair:

IMG_2461.thumb.JPG.6810124450f30f77cf553d67f0760cf5.JPG

I'm very pleased to have been able to repair these parts as they can be quite expensive when purchased second hand; from personal experience I've seen the Valjoux and Venus jumpers cost between $30 and $120 USD which is quite a lot for a little bit of steel.  Pierce parts can be hard to come by also.  I currently have two Pierces in varying stages of repair so the jumpers will come in handy.

On a side note I don't vape so I have no idea why tiny nickel wire is necessary for smokeless smoking. :blink:

  • Like 5
Posted
3 hours ago, jaycey said:

Nice one!

Rather than pinning the wire, could you have used shellac to secure that too?

Probably.  I have a bunch of brass pins though and honestly I find them easier to work with than shellac.

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Howdy, Ry!

I just loved your blow-by-blow of this repair.  What ingenuity to come up with the solution like you did.  I think pinning with the brass was a good idea... the shellac might have worked, but the replacement pin, I think, adds just a bit more security, owing to the pressure it would be under.  

Great job and I thoroughly enjoyed the walk-through.  :thumbsu:

Shirley 

  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I believe @nickelsilver has a setup like that.
    • I posted pictures earlier in this thread. My lathe and mill are two separate instruments. I think I have seen examples of putting a milling head on a lathe bed...but not certain.
    • Timex Camper, September 1994, new to me. Strap is an old perlon with "Germany" in script etched into the resin on the tail end. Not Horlon or Eulit I believe. History unknown, running strong, losing less than a minute a day. Goals for this: Wear it a ton! Buy crystal lift, clean out the gunk around the ring and under the crystal Eventually swap into a stainless steel case. I've seen a member who has swapped a Timex mechanical movement into the Timex J.Crew quartz field watch case.
    • One of the problems we would have with a watchmaker's lathe is they were made over considerable span of time and manufacturing in the early days probably wasn't as good as it was today. Then if you look at the older catalogs typically it was just the head a few collets and something to rest graver on. So basically a basic lathe with over time things acquired but acquired things may or may not fit. Order today you purchase a used lathe that all kinds of nifty bits and pieces from a seller that acquired from? This would come back to that the basic watchmaker's lathe was used for basic watchmaking like turning things with a hand graver. Then limited indexing is fine because you can make things like stems Which don't need a whole bunch indexing   In the link above the word vector is mentioned and at the link below you can purchase one. Then of course you're going to need the motor that's a little bit extra for the price. https://www.hswalsh.com/product/lathe-vector-watchmakers-48-collets-hl11. That you're going to need some bonus parts like these found this picture online show the classic way of classic gear cutting.   The lathe could have a much bigger indexing disk but it has to be mounted close to the edge. Otherwise you're going to have a whole bunch of smaller disks like this which I think has notches rather than holes. Then as wonderful as these pictures look actually cutting a gear with this is not entirely fun. Look at all is belts all pulling on things and this is a watchmaker's lathe lightweight with lots of bits and pieces attached. It would make more sense if you actually cut a gear with something like this and it tends to be it's not really the best way to do it looks nice on paper but it is not the best way to go. Reality for cutting watch parts would be a bigger machine is much better. Than getting rid of all those belts and pulleys also good. Here is an interesting channel I would've liked of found a different video but this was nice and short if you look at his video as he uses a stepping motor and worm gear assembly for the indexing plate. In this particular video it gets attached to the lathe at about one minute and seven seconds and it looks like it's hiding looks like he has a Sherline. I do know he's had other stuff you'll just have to go through his videos to find it. Then at about one minute and 22 seconds you find out if you set up things appropriately. It's always bad we end up with half a tooth at the very end. Then you will note big lathe yes he's getting a big gear but you could easily cut a watch gear with the setup. And it definitely way more stable than a watchmaker's lathe.         Oh here's a company they been in business since 1911 http://www.fwderbyshireinc.com/  
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
×
×
  • Create New...