Jump to content

Poljot 3133 chronograph


GeorgeClarkson

Recommended Posts

Maybe its me, bit I haven't seen poljot chronographs posted in this forum. Is there a reason for this? I have a near NOS and just got me for X-mas from Russia another one to restore... The Poljot 3133 is the 'copy' of the Valjoux 7734 movement, actually built with the machines Valjoux sold to Russia, a bit improved in some aspects, but rougher finishing. Any Poljot lovers out there?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, GeorgeClarkson said:

Maybe its me, bit I haven't seen poljot chronographs posted in this forum. Is there a reason for this? I have a near NOS and just got me for X-mas from Russia another one to restore... The Poljot 3133 is the 'copy' of the Valjoux 7734 movement, actually built with the machines Valjoux sold to Russia, a bit improved in some aspects, but rougher finishing. Any Poljot lovers out there?

I like those Poljots too and am hoping to add one to my collection soon.  I've had my eye out for a Zeppelin LZ 127, which isn't actually a Poljot but uses the 3133 movement.

hrs_zeppelin3.jpg

Interestingly, I believe the 3133 is a derivative of the Valjoux 7734 which traces it's roots back to the Venus 188.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Geo actually the parts are no problem, since here in Germany there is plenty of. The real problem is getting them at fair prices... but that's another story altogether.

@RyMoeller:  That is a very nice watch! Yes it uses the 3133 movement from Poljot which as I said in my opening post was built using the designs and machines from Valjoux, which the russians bought from the Swiss manufacturer. They did improve the design a bit, but the overall finish is rougher.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/27/2016 at 3:12 AM, RyMoeller said:

  I've had my eye out for a Zeppelin LZ 127, which isn't actually a Poljot but uses the 3133 movement.

hrs_zeppelin3.jpg

 

you had to go and show a zeppelin. man! i love their designs. i keep looking at these on a regular basis. it's on my (ever growing) list. i didn't know who's movement was used in this watch.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ops, I did it again.....

I just won another Poljot 3133, a Sturmanskie at that... and also this one is not working... Guess I will have plenty of work to do!

I am getting the fix on these...

Pictures from the seller are pretty good and the condition is, apparently, pretty good, judging from them. I only hope the problem is easy to resolve...

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_2.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_4.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_1.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, frenchie said:

Looks good... except for the hairspring that looks a little bit bent out of shape.

Yes you are right, and this is not the only issue apparently. I also noticed that the dial looks "strange"... Hope I can find pictures of an original, untouched Sturmanskie to compare.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

According to some research I made and forum posts I found on watchuseek, there should be nothing bad about the dial nor the entire watch I bought. Actually, it appears to be one of the earliest models, from the first half of the 80s. On watchuseek.com I found the graph below. The Sturmanskie black and white logo, like the one I got, is no.7

I also attached another image of an identical watch, also found on the same thread over at watchuseek.com

80sDials.jpg

mid_80s.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at that balance bridge screw, I don't think you will have been the first one to have been under the bridge before, it seems a bit proud but I have never worked on one of these and maybe it's meant to look like that.
Cheers, Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Geo said:

Is that a hacking lever sitting on the top edge of the balance wheel?  If it is, no wonder it's not running.

Don't think that's a hacking lever, looks more like the rather badly deformed terminal curve of the H/S between the stud and the regulator.

Quite common damage when someone who doesn't know what they are doing plays with the regulator, moves it all the way to the fastest position so that the regulator goes beyond the dogleg to the terminal curve, then moves it back again. The dogleg gets jammed between the regulator pins ans as a result, it gets dragged round causing the H/S to buckle out between the regulator and the stud, pulling the rest of the H/S out of true and stopping the watch.

Provided it's not been too badly b*ggered it's a relatively easy fix and the watch is back to running condition.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Vich said:

Looking at that balance bridge screw, I don't think you will have been the first one to have been under the bridge before, it seems a bit proud but I have never worked on one of these and maybe it's meant to look like that.
Cheers, Vic

It does look a bit proud to me too, Vich. These pictures are the sellers, I still did not receive the watch myself, so please wait till I update this post with my findings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Marc said:

Don't think that's a hacking lever, looks more like the rather badly deformed terminal curve of the H/S between the stud and the regulator.

Quite common damage when someone who doesn't know what they are doing plays with the regulator, moves it all the way to the fastest position so that the regulator goes beyond the dogleg to the terminal curve, then moves it back again. The dogleg gets jammed between the regulator pins ans as a result, it gets dragged round causing the H/S to buckle out between the regulator and the stud, pulling the rest of the H/S out of true and stopping the watch.

Provided it's not been too badly b*ggered it's a relatively easy fix and the watch is back to running condition.

This is also my line of thought. I analyzed the pictures of the seller, and it does appear to be exactly like you wrote. Hope we are not both wrong on this, which seems a pretty easy fix to be honest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As I mentioned in one of my replies, there are other issues to this watch, apart the bet HS or just the need for a nice clean and service.

Check the picture here enclosed. Is it me, or this looks like a bad redial? If so, apparently I must be more careful with my purchases, since this would be the second time....

Clearly from the pictures attached, the seconds and minutes markers ring is offset in relation to the hour markers...

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_12.jpg

poljot_3133_sturmanskie_11.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hi everyone, I put together a Venus 178 recently, but found that the hour counter "creeps" ie. runs when the chrono is disengaged. This is the similar type of setup as the Omega 861, where the hour counter is driven off the mainspring barrel, but stopped when the chrono is disengaged by a friction spring.  Am I correct in assuming that the friction spring for the hour counter driving pinion should be dry? I am guessing that the issue will be either the spring or the driving pinion, but while the driving pinion has some wear the spring looks decent.  I've attached a couple of photos in case anyone has any tips. Thanks in advance!
    • Thanks everyone for the replies. It seems setting the hand is a bit of a guessing game, and I thought there would be a very specific way to do it. Since the reserve indicator hand moves clockwise as the spring is wound, I tried setting it right at the start of the black side. But setting it there doesn't really make sense, because by the time the spring is halfway wound, the hand is only at the end of the red side... In my head halfway wound shouldn't mean the hand is still "in the red."
    • Lovely part of the country! I spend most of my days driving along the A64 for work in and around York. I'll be sure to drop plenty of questions soon! I've actually got a couple of watches on the way that I'm pretty sure I'll need some help with! They look pretty beat up from the pics but I love a challenge and an excuse to buy more tools 🤣
    • I have two of these in my home. You need to remove the movement from the case, take off the hands and remove the dial and take a few good photos of the front plate so I can see what the problem is. The round nut unscrews and the hands pull off pull them off from the center and not the tips as you could break them. 
    • I asked the question of one of the sellers. Its for removing the pins and making the holes in motorbike drive belts. God knows why they were both in two seperate joblots of watchmaking tool, thats bizarre. I haven't posted your setting lever steel yet mike, been busy with my mum past few days and had a locked myself in at home lazy watch repair day today 🙂 but I'm out tomorrow so i will get it off to you then. 
×
×
  • Create New...