Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

is the Is price difference from the Timegrapher 1000, to the 1900 worth it?

 

Any input appreciated as will be purchasing one soon. Don' want to waste money that could then be spent on more movements ..... :)

 

Posted

The 1900 give you the option to manually select the beat. This can be very useful. The 1000 is very limited in this respect. Having said that, the 1000 is excellent for majority of watches you would work on, no good for co-axials but good for the most common beat ranges.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted

The newer Timegrapher 1000 works on Co-axials as well as option to manually select the beat rate. My understanding is that the limitations of the older 1000 (as per Mark's comments) were not hardware limitations but rather software's. If you get a new Timegrapher 1000 today you should be able to use it on Co-axial as well as manually select the beat rate. For common beat rate, you could just set it to Auto (e.g. 12000, 14400, 18000, 19800, 21600, 25200, 28800, 36000, 43200). For not so common beat rate, you can select manual beat rate.
 
The following is a video of my Omega Co-Axial 3313 on newer Timegrapher 1000 (DD position, Lift Angle 38 degree, Beat rate set to Auto).

 

Posted

Thanks for the info Ferdinand. For the money, these machines are really very good!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

I also have the Timegrapher 1900 and as clockboy says I also cannot fault it, a great piece of kit for a little bit extra...

  • 2 months later...
Posted

Hey all, I am looking at getting a timing machine and cleaning machine for home use, but I am not yet ready to shell out for a Witschi (still in school).

 

Does anyone have any experience with the timing machine that Otto Frei sells here? It's a Chinese model, the Graiger-1000. If I order it through O. Frei, I can get it for a little bit more than what the manufacturer sells it for on Alibaba (and I won't have to pay any duties on it). Also, I would love to get a printer for it if possible. Does anyone know if that is possible?

 

Regarding cleaning machines, I am thinking about getting a mid-size generic jewelry ultrasonic and just using different beakers for my cleaning and rinse solutions. Would this be a serviceable "hack" until I have the funds to get a better ultrasonic?

 

 

Thanks in advance!

Posted

Hi watchmakingjourney,

 

I believe several of us use those 2 solutions you describe. I do myself and have not problem. I guess you'll be OK with them.

 

And welcome to the forum.

 

Bob

Posted

Hi watchmakingjourney,

 

I believe several of us use those 2 solutions you describe. I do myself and have not problem. I guess you'll be OK with them.

 

And welcome to the forum.

 

Bob

Thank you for the reply! I had a feeling that the cheaper set-up would be just fine for now. Since I'm not working ATM, I need to make sure that I am spending my money wisely.

Posted

Bob is spot on, on both accounts. I use the same cleaning technique and timing machine. The Timegrapher was purchased from China and find it works very well.

  • 1 month later...
Posted

With a little help from Santa's £'s this xmas I'm looking to purchase a Timegrapher 1000, problem is where to get it from. Ebay seems the place although they vary so much in price. All from China. Any recomendations??..

Posted

If in the UK try to buy from a EU seller, that way you will avoid possible import duty & VAT. I bought a 1900 recently from a UK seller advertised as UK stock. Unfortunately they had run out and imported one direct from China at no extra cost & it arrived within 2 weeks, plus they kept me well informed. They still advertise on fleabay but have changed the item location to China.

  • Like 1
Posted

When you finally purchase you watch timing machine you might find the following vid interesting. How to determine what the watch you are working on lift angle is using a timing machine.

 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted

I got mine from China , I was a bit concerned but it all worked out ok and didn't pay any additional costs , but for this Christmas I got a waterproof pressure tester again from China and had to pay £26 fees to UPS , well my daughter did as she bought it for me 

  • 2 months later...
Posted

That looks exactly the same as the one I have although the name is different. It serves me very well and I wouldn't be without it. There may well be better machines, but at the price you won't get better. :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've been given a small Accurist quartz ladies watch to have a look at. It was reported as not working, and hand been in a drawer for a number of years. I noticed before opening it that the hands were misaligned: the minute hand was at about 20 to the hour, but the hour hand was at about quarter past nine. When I opened it, I found the dial turned freely. Immediately thinking broken dial feet, I removed the dead battery and the hands and the dial came straight off. I half expected to find the dial feet stuck in the movement, but instead I found no evidence of dial feet at all ... as in it appears it never had dial feet. Instead the dial appears to have been secured with dots of adhesive that are no longer sticky enough to do their job. There are a couple of coppery spots on the back of the dial, but they don't correspond with holes on the movement that could support dial feet. So, first, is this a thing, where some watches were sold with adhesive instead of dial feet? If so, what adhesive would be appropriate to use to replace what is there that has lost its tack? If not, I'll have to assume that the movement was replaced at some time with one that didn't match the feet on the dial, and the person who did the repair removed the dial feet and replaced them with adhesive dots. I can see what appear to be holes for feet on the movement. Should I try to make new dial feet on those positions on the dial? Would that be best practice here?
    • Hi everyone, I wanted to quickly introduce myself to the forum here from London England. I have started repairing watches over a month ago, and I have used this forum continuously, but covertly, through every step of the process over the 10, or so, watches that I have done so far. I love the forum and it seems like a great community of people that I am very excited to join. I have yet to find a question that has not already been answered over the years in all the subforums here, so I don't have any real reason to be joining apart from just really enjoying the content as a whole. Until I come up with a question for the group or my partner tells me that I am not allowed to waste anymore money on watch tools, it is great to be here, and I look forward to receiving your guidance and advice in the future.  
    • I contacted these guys in the UK and they can either supply a clip on mic to go with their software, or they’ll modify an existing microphone you send them, or they can supply a refurbished and modified microphone.   Does any know where to find this software?  I found various old threads, with links that don’t work anymore, but no website for the product. 
    • The 268 mechanism cover has this gear that’s friction fit to a post and like a cannon pinion it can become loose, creating too much slack and allowing for improper meshing. Instead of the broken setting wheel I often see broken teeth on the gear underneath. This is from the last 3135 I serviced… …it’s really kind of a poorly designed part…and why is it all one part? 🧐 …and on this one I never found the missing tooth. Did the previous service provider just replace this broken part?
    • I had it in a little jar in a double bath at 60ºC in a more or less super saturated solution - some crystals came back out of solution as it cooled. Heat was really the trick - When I started at room temperature I could see a bubble form on top of the old stem and just sit there but when heated there was a constant stream of bubbles  
×
×
  • Create New...