Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 3 months later...
  • Replies 202
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

There are differences beyond the display size of why someone would pay roughly $3000 versus 225 for a 1900. But for most hobbyists you're never going to notice the difference. I have actually done sid

The 1900 give you the option to manually select the beat. This can be very useful. The 1000 is very limited in this respect. Having said that, the 1000 is excellent for majority of watches you would w

taking it on and off would add a new variation of having to wait at least 30 seconds for the watch to stabilize otherwise that's going to introduce a variation. the timing machine has a start/stop but

Posted Images

On 4/21/2016 at 8:17 AM, jdm said:

For 15x the money of the Chinese one, you get a bigger display (that is harder to read), and it shows exactly the same beat rate, amplitude, etc. as the Chinese one. Down to the last s/d. But you can do Omega co-axial escapements on it, so there is some advantage. And I can call myself serious now 

There are differences beyond the display size of why someone would pay roughly $3000 versus 225 for a 1900. But for most hobbyists you're never going to notice the difference. I have actually done side-by-side comparison with a Witschi Watch Expert II and the 1000 1900 Chinese machines. Overall for the money the Chinese machines are outstanding but if you're really going to nitpicky about it the Swiss machines have some differences.

So let's look at one of the most interesting features I find with the Chinese machines which is who actually makes them? For instance Swiss Timing machine company witschi You can look them up them website they physically exist they have distributors if you had a problem somebody could help you with it. The Chinese machines it's almost impossible to track down where they actually come from. Not that that's a problem because at the price who cares. Then the internal software to run the machines seems to come in two separate types. To explain that I have a image below. So some of the Chinese machines have limited ranges versus the 1900 or 1000. Then if you look at all the different physical sizes their actual characteristics don't really change is not really much advantage of buying a bigger machine. Although as pointed out above if you get the right machine you can use a printer with it. But if you are planning a getting a machine with a printer get it at the time don't plan on adding it later as I've seen the machines without printers don't have the right software to run the printer it's a separate chip.

So one of the features missing from the Chinese machine found on the Swiss is frequency mode. Suppose you're doing American pocket watch someplace swap the hairspring or it's missing a timing screw it's running hopelessly fast slow or something not even close to 18,000 beats per hour and frequency mode It will tell you exactly what frequency it's running at.. 

Other things External audio noise such as an electric shaver in my case. The Chinese machine was showing absolute garbage on the screen the Swiss was working fine. But if the noise is large enough the right frequencies all the timing machines while problems. At work we had problems with one of the cleaning machines so is banished to another room.

Then this one I've seen before if the amplitude is too low sometimes the Chinese machine will pick up the wrong part of the waveform giving the impression of a much higher amplitude.

So I'm attaching some images. For those of you who like naked electronics like I do the inside of the 1000, 1900 and watch expert II. Then two examples of what the timing machine shows timing of the same watch. Yes if you're clever you can clip both microphones on the same watch at the same time. You don't always get the exact same results because both machines are averaging at slightly different places in the waveform. So you can see the Chinese machine in this case the 1000 is doing very well on a watch that's magnetized. The peculiar sine wave is an indication of a watch that's magnetized.  Then we see another example of the extremely low amplitude the Chinese machine is confused.

 

 

 

 

 

timing.JPG

t1.JPG

t2.JPG

t3.JPG

t3-.JPG

t4.JPG

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Very informative as the usual John, In fact I have quite few negative comments about by Chinese 1000, it works for what I do but is far from being a good deal for the money paid, at least in this millennium. 15 years perhaps it was.

  1. Pathetic display straight from the 80s. I think it cost more for the factory to stil buy these rather than newer types
  2. Total lack of features like saving / averaging results over time
  3. No NV memory to save at least the lift angle, mute setting etc.
  4. Synthesized speaker sound, which basically makes it useless.

All that way before asking for real features like a PC interface, etc. I still like it better than an app because it has an decent mike stand and is always ready to use unlike a tablet or PC.

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

So I'm attaching some images. For those of you who like naked electronics like I do the inside of the 1000, 1900 and watch expert II.

Interesting that the Witschi PCB design seems to be early-mid 90s or thereabouts, all through-hole. The Chinese ones are of a much more modern design (I have a 1900).

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jdm said:

Very informative as the usual John, In fact I have quite few negative comments about by Chinese 1000, it works for what I do but is far from being a good deal for the money paid, at least in this millennium. 15 years perhaps it was.

  1. Pathetic display straight from the 80s. I think it cost more for the factory to stil buy these rather than newer types
  2. Total lack of features like saving / averaging results over time
  3. No NV memory to save at least the lift angle, mute setting etc.
  4. Synthesized speaker sound, which basically makes it useless.

All that way before asking for real features like a PC interface, etc. I still like it better than an app because it has an decent mike stand and is always ready to use unlike a tablet or PC.

Thanks for reminding me I totally forgot about the horrible beeping sound that you always turn off because can't stand to listen to it. Having actual audio of the watch ticking is really nice when you're looking at garbage on the display. Often times you can hear if the hairspring for instances bumping into things that makes a interesting ringing sound.

What would be really nice is to find out who actually makes the 1000/1900 timing machine and have a talk with them. A lot of the additional things we want is basically software. Then for display even the Swiss machine I would really like to have twice the number of pixels and the screen is too shiny. It's very very hard to get a picture without getting lights reflecting on the screen a reflection of me the camera something it's really hard to get a picture of.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, teegee said:

Interesting that the Witschi PCB design seems to be early-mid 90s or thereabouts, all through-hole. The Chinese ones are of a much more modern design (I have a 1900).

Yes the circuit board does look like something ancient but supposedly it's leadfree it's not super old. Then the actual purchase date of this September 2006. So basically it was the cheapest timing machine they had at the time.

My suspicion of why the circuit board is old is that it probably is. Why Update or change what you have if you don't have to? So the hardware is old but the internal programs been updated. Then when you go to the third generation they change the screen and add in some additional functions I have no idea if the hardware is changed at all.

Then I heard an interesting story have no idea where I heard this. The printer for these is hard to find because the control codes to send the graphics are based on a printer that doesn't exist and hasn't existed for a very long time. So whoever wrote the original printer software is still used several generations later. Probably because it worked and they probably didn't figure anyone would be cheap And went to buy the printer somewhere else. Fortunately there is at least one company that has a printer that emulates and will do the graphics cheaply.

So there modern timing machines are becoming less hardware-based more computer programs. So here's their fourth-generation machine looks quite interesting. Looks like it has the same price as the third generation machine which was just slightly more expensive than the second generation machine. Although it's still really really expensive compared to the Chinese machine.

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/Watch_Expert-Leaflet.pdf

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...

Hello everyone,

I'm in search of a timegrapher machine and not finding many options.

The Chinese model 6000 caught my attention but I couldn't find any reviews about it.

e7bbef8904d895c51a4e8f9317fe1619.png

Any suggestions or advice?

Any place to find used quality machines?

Thank you much for the advice.

JG

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, jguitron said:

 

Hello everyone,

I'm in search of a timegrapher machine and not finding many options.

The Chinese model 6000 caught my attention but I couldn't find any reviews about it.

e7bbef8904d895c51a4e8f9317fe1619.png

Any suggestions or advice?

Any place to find used quality machines?

Thank you much for the advice.

JG

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

on ebay £135 sterling

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, jguitron said:

I'm in search of a timegrapher machine and not finding many options.

The Chinese model 6000 caught my attention but I couldn't find any reviews about it.

Any suggestions or advice?

Any place to find used quality machines?

If you search on this very forum there are various discussions about Chinese machine with pro and cons explained.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

Great value for money these for the novice watch guys or curious owner.  Mine has been in daily use for over two years now, and still working perfectly.  It will be for sale soon though due to recently upgrading to a professional model.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...

I'm upgrading my Weishi no. 1000 to a better model with a printer support. Which are the main differences between Weishi no. 2000 and no. 3000 models? Which printer should I take, a normal or thermal one? I don't have much money to spend with this, so is no. 2000 with a regular printer fine enough?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, jdm said:

There are few places, one is timegraphers.com that list each model features. Also I recall SSTEEL here has recently bought a complete 3000 system.

Indeed, will be set up once we move back into our own larger premises.  The trusty 1000 will be up for grabs in the new year.

Its actually the TYMC 9900A I recently upgraded to.

https://www.cousinsuk.com/product/tymc-mtg9900a

Edited by SSTEEL
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...

Famous last words above, my trusty 1000 timegrapher gave up the ghost this afternoon, it served me well for a few years, but as of today its reading the same reading with any movement I put on the microphone, including new, known 100% running movements (When fully wound of course).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello SSteel,

I don't know if this will help or not, but there's a place here in the US where you can get timing machine repair.  As an alternative, if they don't service your model, or it's not worth repairing, they often have refurbished machines for sale.  If you want to give it a shot, the website is  www.timemachinerepair.com

The phone number is on the web site.  Hope this helps!

Shirley

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Shirley, but if you read a few posts above, you will see I recently purchased a TYMC 9900A, so will problems have a play with this 1000 for fun.  Only reason I'm not yet using the TYMC 9900A is because I'm moving premises on the 28th of this month, plus, there's no room for it here anyway, so remodelling my workshop when Ive moved :) 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • jdm pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Similar Content

    • By deathkei
      Hello
      I measured my Omega Caliber 1120 through an timegrapher app. (Dial Up, full wind)
      I know the app is not very accurate.

      I checked about +100s/d difference and sharply tilted graph .
      The odd thing is that the bottom part of the graph is not printed every 100+- seconds.(red-colored circle)
      Is this a feature of the timegrapher, or does it indicate abnormal state of movement component?
       
      Thank you for the comments.
    • By FitOutPost
      Hi, my name is Ross. I am a rookie watch enthusiast and I am really puzzled here.
      Could someone explain to me what kind of a problem am I facing with my timegrapher?
      I do two sets of measurements with the same watch (1 day or 6 days apart) and receive vastly different results - to the point of being completely different from what I observe in real life. 
      For example, my timegrapher shows that my watch is running fast (or ahead of time), while in real life I observe that it runs 7 seconds per day behind. I even recorded a video about it so you could see it for yourself: https://youtu.be/mhGzf6aLMlY
      How should I interpret that? Am I doing anything wrong?

      Problem_with_Timegrapher_-_Knowledge_Sharing__16.mp4
    • By east3rn
      Hello. 
      I am working on a vtg. Citizen cal.7520 automatic movement.
      I have put the watch on the timegrapher 
      The graph looks OK but the beat error shows 9.9ms. I presumed that beat error should be around 1.0~2.0 given the shape of the graph.
      Is the beat error actually bad or the timegrapher is wrong??
      Thank you!
       

    • By Padd
      Hello Everyone,
      Padd here from the UK.
      It all started with a desire to fix a Submariner replica I bought off a lucky lucky man in Pisa, Italy while on a European tour.
      Next thing I know I'm investigating Submariner replicas and building my own, signed by me, using a Seagull ST2130 movement, adventure watch.
      Now I'm hooked, I took inspiration from Marks videos, now I'm happily starting to work on parts of the movement, and have recovered one or two movements where the stem came out, but wouldn't stay back in. I have built a few watches for friends and relations, but now I need to be able to service them when they come back to me.
      I also have a couple of movements that run really badly, so I will be practising on those over the winter weekends. Full repair/servicing kit IS my Christmas present.
      I really want to get one of those ST2130's, serviced and tweaked by me, doing a -------------------------- on my timegrapher. not a -.'-.'''--,'.'.' (and worse) that they do at the moment.
      I wont start to list my watch collection, but it runs from a Casio digital to a Rolex pocket watch with Seikos, Citizens, Omegas and home builds in the mix.
      Must do Mark's course, but I'm afraid I may have already learned 60+% of it already.

  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

×
×
  • Create New...