Jump to content
Legarm

Chinese Timegraphers

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone! I am looking to get a new cheap timegrpaher, I am just a hobbist and I would like to get one useful piece at a low cost since I am from Argentina and the argentinian peso is really devaluated. I have seen some chinese models on Amazon and Ebay (US) and I am interested in the N.1000 or N.1900...

My question i...  is there any of these chinese brands anny better than the other? Weishi, Otoolworld, Mophorn? I hope ou can helpp me, thank you so much!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have one of these, it seems to work well. I have not had the luxury of being able to compare it with other models. These machines are available with different brand labels, Weishi, TYMC, sometimes they are sold with no brand at all.

Ace Timer 1000

Edited by dadistic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I am looking to get a new cheap timegrpaher, I am just a hobbist and I would like to get one useful piece at a low cost since I am from Argentina and the argentinian peso is really devaluated. 

For real savings, and no issues with Aduanas, I recommend that you try a software application first. You only need to get a good mic.

Edited by jdm

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello there. I have a question about readout / operation of my timegrapher. 

  1. I've tested about 15 quartz watches (new and old), and amplitude on all read either 176° or 175°. My question is whether this is the highest reading for quartz watches in contrary to 270° on mechanical watches, or is there something wrong? I've tried to search google and not much info about it.
  2. When it starts in Auto mode with quartz watches it always starts with 12000 (parameters) and doesn't adjust automatically, so I have manually to dial it up to 3600 in order to get it to read properly, (with the very few mechanical watches so far it adjust itself). Is this the way it should work, or something wrong with it?
  3. I've found that some quartz watches like small ladies watches and sports watches, don't give readings even though I tried pushing the watch toward the sensor, for whatever reason the reading is too weak or something?

Thanks for your help.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Which timing machine are you using?

Then you can't get an answer to your question as it's an invalid question.  Unless a course I am totally misunderstanding your question then it may be a valid question. So first Link talks about mechanical watch testing And it explains how amplitude is measured. Quartz watches can be found in the second link. Unless of course and there were a few of these there were some quartz watches with a balance wheel. But as the balance wheel isn't driven by the escapement for the most part there may be an exception to that you have no way of measuring the amplitude. It is possible the timing machine is picking up the width of the stepping motor pulse confusing that with what it needs to pick up for amplitude and giving you a number.

So typically a timing machine for quartz watches is entirely different than a mechanical watch timing machine. Although you can get timing machines that will do both.

Then the problem with the ladies watches or any quartz watch without a second hand is that it does not step once per second. Especially on the ladies watches to save power they will step at a much longer time interval.

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Test and measuring technology mechanical watches.pdf

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Knowledge Quartz Watch.pdf

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
22 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Which timing machine are you using?

Then you can't get an answer to your question as it's an invalid question.  Unless a course I am totally misunderstanding your question then it may be a valid question. So first Link talks about mechanical watch testing And it explains how amplitude is measured. Quartz watches can be found in the second link. Unless of course and there were a few of these there were some quartz watches with a balance wheel. But as the balance wheel isn't driven by the escapement for the most part there may be an exception to that you have no way of measuring the amplitude. It is possible the timing machine is picking up the width of the stepping motor pulse confusing that with what it needs to pick up for amplitude and giving you a number.

So typically a timing machine for quartz watches is entirely different than a mechanical watch timing machine. Although you can get timing machines that will do both.

Then the problem with the ladies watches or any quartz watch without a second hand is that it does not step once per second. Especially on the ladies watches to save power they will step at a much longer time interval.

 

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Test and measuring technology mechanical watches.pdf

http://www.witschi.com/assets/files/sheets/Knowledge Quartz Watch.pdf

 

Many thanks for the information.

 I am using the Weishi (made in China) machine.

I've also found this info for those who may be interested.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Bill3 ,  I had a Timegrapher 1000 and returned it because of a fault.  I then purchased the 1900 model and I think that it is excellent. It does everything I require and performs very well.  Great value for money.  Nice for setting the Beat Error, Regulating and checking amplitude etc. The problem for me is not the Timegrapher , it is the old worn watches Ha Ha !!. Yes, get one. You will be pleased.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can anyone recommend a beginners timegrapher that is worthwhile?

Something in the £100 to £125 range, or cheaper if it is worth buying.

 

Xmas is coming up and I am thinking of suggesting that the family chip in and get me one.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When it came time for me to buy mine I just went on to ebay and got one of many basic timegraphers sold there, believe my model is the no.1000, which looks to be 120, so pretty slap bang in your range.

It works well, has decent build quality, it measures rate, amplitude and beat error, and has a mute so you dont have to hear it tick, a pause function and some other more advanced options such as manual paramater settings and lift angle settings. 

I have no complaints. 

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Timegrapher-Watch-Timing-Machine-Multifunction-Tester-NO-1000-CE-UK-Shipping/301966015167?epid=909412595&hash=item464e93babf:g:whIAAOSwOdpXy~QE

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For the price range you have The 1000 is the only thing that will come in that price range as mentioned above. If you have a little more money  I think the  LCD display is a little nicer on the 1900.. Unfortunately the cost is a little more looks like approximately £150 and shipping doesn't appear to be  included. Then for eBay do a search for either machine  there does seem to be quite a price variation..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hey guys.

 

I'm looking into a timegrapher. Currently I time my watches the old-fashioned way (time them against my iPhone stopwatch, or overnight) and I'd like a faster way, as I MAY branch out to servicing movemnts for others. I'd like to check all the normal positions and the overnight test method, while accurate, is frankly a PITA. I'm sure one of the eBay specials are fine for my needs, but I see they offer several models (1000, 1500 etc.)  and I'm having a hard time seeing the differences between them.

basically, is it a waste of money for a "fancier" (higher number) model or are there real advantages to "paying now" rather than "paying more later"?

I work with ETA's (and variants) so, Tudor, Omega (so co-axial escapement may be an issue?) and Rolex. I may get into some older stuff but I think they have beat rates and lift angles well covered, from what I read on the various seller's listings. I'd love to get a Seiko high-beat (or another brand) because of that S M O O T H sweep... Mesmerizing...

So I guess I'm asking from either an owner, or others looking's perspective, what features do you find are "essential" and what can you live without/don't care about? Do you own a "1000" for example and wish you bought a "higher" model? Did you buy the "higher" model and realize you don't need the added features (whatever they are)?

Thanks to all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For most people the 1000 or 1900 which is a little nicer screen and a couple of other features is perfectly suitable. The Chinese machines are interesting in that for the most part there aren't really additional features with more money. Basically the screen size layout changes. If you want additional features you have to go to the Swiss like witschi. So when you go to machine made by witschi the price goes up considerably so does the quality it's basically a professional instrument and it does have lots of other features.

I put links below the ace timer according to the list will do the co-axial escapement . But the slightly used ace time or I picked up off of eBay doesn't appear to have any way to do that? Then for a witschi their watch expert now in the fourth generation is usually the least expensive machine. Don't know what the current price is but typically around $3000. So with which either getting a professional machine designed the run every single day in a shop as it definite quality difference at least with the microphone. But there is that really huge price difference. So links below so you can compare the specifications.

http://www.acetimer.com/Watch-and-Pocket-Watch-Timing-Machine-Multifunction-Timegrapher-1000.html

https://www.witschi.com/en/group-of-devices/measurement-of-mechanical-watches/watch-expert/watch-expert.html

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I purchased the 1900 after some research. I would if room and the money go for software based system such as the Graham Baxter system because it can be used for clocks as well as watches. I think Mark has a vid on this very subject.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, jdm said:

There are various threads about timegrapheres if you take the time to use the search function. I will pin up the best one as that's a FAQ.

I definitely recommend the 1900 over the 1000.

Hmmm... the very first thing I did was put “timegrapher “ in the search box and came up with nothing, expecting a flood to dig through. 

I am on a few boards, mod at one so I know the score. 

I appreciate the links and will take a look. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Tudor said:

Hmmm... the very first thing I did was put “timegrapher “ in the search box and came up with nothing, expecting a flood to dig through.  

Maybe something with the search options. Comprehensive topic now pinned. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

For most people the 1000 or 1900 which is a little nicer screen and a couple of other features is perfectly suitable. The Chinese machines are interesting in that for the most part there aren't really additional features with more money. Basically the screen size layout changes. If you want additional features you have to go to the Swiss like witschi. So when you go to machine made by witschi the price goes up considerably so does the quality it's basically a professional instrument and it does have lots of other features.

I put links below the ace timer according to the list will do the co-axial escapement . But the slightly used ace time or I picked up off of eBay doesn't appear to have any way to do that? Then for a witschi their watch expert now in the fourth generation is usually the least expensive machine. Don't know what the current price is but typically around $3000. So with which either getting a professional machine designed the run every single day in a shop as it definite quality difference at least with the microphone. But there is that really huge price difference. So links below so you can compare the specifications.

http://www.acetimer.com/Watch-and-Pocket-Watch-Timing-Machine-Multifunction-Timegrapher-1000.html

https://www.witschi.com/en/group-of-devices/measurement-of-mechanical-watches/watch-expert/watch-expert.html

 

Thank you John, I appreciate the links. I can't justify the significant expense for a "pro" machine, based on the hours of use it will actually receive. I can replace the cheap one several times before I am at the price point.

I guess if it's a matter of accuracy, the investment is worth it to me. But, although I see a calibration port, I have no idea how to actually calibrate it... (I see no calibration tools out there) With regards to cheap measurement tools, as long as I can confirm the accuracy/repeatability I'm good. If a $10 tool can be calibrated to do the job, I'm good. Conversely, if I can't rely on (or confirm) the "cheap" tool, I am not afraid to spend a bit. (I have about four billion dollars in Snap-On automotive tools spanning three generations).

5 hours ago, clockboy said:

I purchased the 1900 after some research. I would if room and the money go for software based system such as the Graham Baxter system because it can be used for clocks as well as watches. I think Mark has a vid on this very subject.

 

This didn't even dawn on me... PCs are dirt cheap. Get software and a good mic/stand... Looking into this now! Thank you!

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jdm said:

Maybe something with the search options. Comprehensive topic now pinned. 

Yeah, I thought it was odd too- I expected to find a ton on that subject.

I will try again and look around. Although I've received good replies here, I'll compile more data.

PS Thank you for not flaming me!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi,

I’m a bit surprised not more people use and discuss this Iphone/Ipad app. The only weak point I find is the mic (uses the regular headset mic) that can be a bit fiddly to place where you want it.

Apart from that it gives all the information I need in a very similar graphics format as the chinese tabletop versions at a fraction of the cost.

179771a7d08afc00705bb78c860e0340.jpg


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By Padd
      Hello Everyone,
      Padd here from the UK.
      It all started with a desire to fix a Submariner replica I bought off a lucky lucky man in Pisa, Italy while on a European tour.
      Next thing I know I'm investigating Submariner replicas and building my own, signed by me, using a Seagull ST2130 movement, adventure watch.
      Now I'm hooked, I took inspiration from Marks videos, now I'm happily starting to work on parts of the movement, and have recovered one or two movements where the stem came out, but wouldn't stay back in. I have built a few watches for friends and relations, but now I need to be able to service them when they come back to me.
      I also have a couple of movements that run really badly, so I will be practising on those over the winter weekends. Full repair/servicing kit IS my Christmas present.
      I really want to get one of those ST2130's, serviced and tweaked by me, doing a -------------------------- on my timegrapher. not a -.'-.'''--,'.'.' (and worse) that they do at the moment.
      I wont start to list my watch collection, but it runs from a Casio digital to a Rolex pocket watch with Seikos, Citizens, Omegas and home builds in the mix.
      Must do Mark's course, but I'm afraid I may have already learned 60+% of it already.

    • By PJA
      Just in case, I came across this "Watch-O-Scope" software. To those who have a need for it. Also here is an instructional video how to install. I hope it will help somebody here.
    • By maclerche
      I have gotten hold on a Elma Star vibrograf. Does anyone know if you can still buy paper and carbon for this machine?  
       

    • By SteveT
      I was wondering how do the timegrapher phone app's out there compare to a dedicated bench top machine. I'm guessing it's all down to the piezoelectric pickup? I installed tickoprint on my phone the other day. But to get the full features you need to shell out $30, if you then also have to shell out for a piezoelectric mic, then you are almost at the same price point as a cheap chinese bench top machine!
       
  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I think I'm gonna do that.  Thanks!
    • Looks like a fun project. I suspect there is little that would stop it passing modern electrical safety standards, so long as it is earthed, has the correct rated fuse, and a suitable mains cable attached. How does the speed controller work? Some of these old speed controllers use an interesting arrangement of compressible carbon disks as a variable resistor. I have an old Singer sewing machine that uses this arrangement, and a slightly newer Kenwood Chef mixer that uses a triac speed controller. Both are 1970s vintage, and both work well. I would inspect any capacitors associated with the motor assuming there are any, and perhaps replace those with modern suitably rated ones, but the rest I would suspect is fine. If the motor runs, then it will probably keep running. If this is a brushed motor, you might like to take the opportunity to clean the commutator with a bristle brush (not a steel wire one) and inspect the motor carbon brushes too. If the brushes are badly worn or damaged, they can kill the commutator pretty quickly.
    • When working with small metal parts, (not necessarily watch parts, but this applies with those too), I will superglue the part to something I can easily hold, for example plastic card stock, or some other metal, then file away, drill, etc.  then dissolve the superglue in acetone to remove the part.
    • A bit of a classic Timex. So much so that Timex recently released a Snoopy version of the new Miyota automatic based Marlins, and a bunch of other self homages in the Peanuts Charlie Brown, Snoopy & Friends range. This more petite version, I'm guessing from the mid seventies, is the one I remember from my childhood, blue dial and all. It is heading in my direction as a "non runner" (no surprises there), and I was the only bid at £1.93  
    • I have recently purchased a National, Electric Watch Cleaning Machine. Attached is a photo for reference and identification of the model type. As can be seen, it has a fairly typical design, reminiscent of many other types, particularly Elma Super Elite. In fact, I do wonder which came first - the National or the Elma. My musings on this point later. This is a very old machine, circa late 1940’s, 1950’s, but they seem to turn up sometimes on eBay, in various conditions ranging from the “beyond hope” and only really suitable as a donor for parts, and the “old but serviceable” and might-be-worth-a-punt-on machines. This one fell into the middle somewhere, as it was a bit tatty and the heating element did not work. On the plus side, it had all its original cleaning fluid jars and lids, and the motor and speed control gave smooth, controllable spinning and no play in the bearings. I went to visit the seller to inspect it and we did a deal on the spot. This is not always possible on eBay, but as the seller had listed it as for collection only (due to its weight), it was a possibility on this occasion. Once I had it home and gave it the once over, I decided that I would have to either do without heating for the drying stage, or find a replacement element. At the same time, it was very obvious that all of the original cabling was not safe to leave in place and it would all have to be removed and replaced. Any other electrical parts deemed unsafe would also be replaced as I inspected them. So - the idea of a restoration (of sorts) was born. Now - it is not my intention to restore it to the point where it could pass current electrical safety standards, but I will be making it as safe as possible, without losing any of the essential character of the original machine. This is not going to be for resale, so being safe to use is an acceptable compromise, in my opinion. I will however, perform testing on it once the electrical work is done, to make sure that the essential aspects of earth leakage, earth bonds and polarity etc. are passed. (PAT Testing included.) Whilst this is not likely to turn into another example of a superb restoration of an Elma Super Elite (as seen elsewhere on these forums), I hope at least to have at the end of it, a perfectly serviceable watch cleaning machine, and a restoration story - of sorts - of a vintage piece of English watch making and servicing machinery. So first off - the before pictures. This one is a good view of the machine and its cosmetic condition, as purchased. The base is a heavy, cast alloy jobbie, with its original crackle paint job beginning to flake away in places, where the years of cleaning chemicals have attacked it,  but generally sound. The jars still had residues of cleaning and rinse chemicals present. The first wash jar (front left), was particularly grotty and can’t have been cleaned for years. Fairly ironic not to clean the thing, that cleans the things! Maybe it was just left unused and unloved for many years. The mains cable was a cloth-bound type I have not seen in years and could well have been original as it still had the old UK wiring standard colours of red/black/green. Also adding to the vintage-ness, was a very old, Bakelite three pin plug. This must have been one of the first of its type as I have not seen one in brown Bakelite before! (And I am 62...) Anyway, that’s enough for now, as I’m not even sure anyone wants to read much about such an old machine. If anyone is interested though, please add comments and I’ll add to the story as I make progress. At the very least, I hope I have found a potential solution to finding/ making your own heating elements for these old machines, which could also include providing replacements for Elma Super Elite, RM80/90 HCS511 etc. Machines. More details later...
×
×
  • Create New...