Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I was referring to the moonswatch, the plastic quartz collaboration between Swatch and Omega, that’s over £200 and I would rate seiko movements over the Swatch quartz. 😀

 

Tom

Posted
  On 3/4/2024 at 5:43 PM, tomh207 said:

I was referring to the moonswatch

Expand  

Sorry, didn't see the "s" 😉

Yes, for sure. Unlike the Pagani, the reviews of these moonSwatches aren't very good either .

I roam regularly a German website "Kleinanzeigen" and currently there are no less than 514 "MoonSwatches" for sale; new and second hand, but next to new. It seems that people like to get rid of them. (https://www.kleinanzeigen.de/s-moonswatch/k0)

On the Pagani I may pull the hands and re-lume them with Superluminova. I like to have the legibility in the night as good as these moon watches are during the day. Besides, good lume comes in handy too when reading the newspaper in the dark 🤣

  • Haha 1
Posted

I enjoy the affordability and style of some of the mechaquartz chronographs, but I really don't like it when one of the registers is being used as a 24-hour indicator, especially on a watch without a date function. That doesn't seem to be a very faithful homage or a useful complication. Of course, even worse are the ones where the large second hand is a normal running seconds hand, and you find upon receipt that one of the small sub-dials is used for the chronograph seconds. Or the ones where what looks like a 12-hour chrono register is just a 12-hour mirror of the hour hand...

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 3/4/2024 at 7:50 PM, Endeavor said:

currently there are no less than 514 "MoonSwatches" for sale

Expand  

The extreme hype around this watch was difficult to understand, but it shows that what really matters is looks and brand. Other than that, a plastic quartz watch, not making me too excited.

  • Like 3
Posted

Hi watchie.  Spot on,   It’s what it looks like on the wrist no matter what’s in side.  Certainly looks the part  but there again so does a dollar watch untill it breaks. One for the fashionistas.  I love Omegas but this doesn’t ring my bell either.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

For me, a bit of a "kinky" side step; two partially broken vintage quartz watches no less ! 🙃

They do run and the chronograph functions do work, but, from both, the small chronograph seconds recorder (1/10 sec) doesn't reset and they don't run 😬

I've found some instructions on how to reset the small seconds recorder, but it doesn't say whether the recorder hand should run, or not, after a battery change;

"Resetting the Chronograph to Zero:

If your chronograph and 1/10 seconds subdial hand are not aligned after a battery change, do not worry as this is common and easily fixed. Simply make sure the crown is in normal position (pressed in against the case), the push Button C (bottom left) twice. The second hand will move, press C again. Pull out the crown to time setting mode. Now you can adjust the two misaligned hands: Button A will advance the central second hand forward, Button B will advance the 1/10 second hand forward. Push the crown back in."

So, since both of them do have the same problem, it could be simple and the seller didn't know how to reset, or there could be more to it? Is it a coincidence that both movements do run (cal. 3510 + cal 3530) and do have the same problem ??

They added thrill is that these Citizen / Miyota 3510 movements (12 jewels ! 😲 ) are discontinued and apparently (very) hard to get (??).

Perhaps one of those: "There is a thin line between a Hero and a Zero" 😂

Anyhow, without further ado here some pictures of what should be in the post;

C-1.thumb.jpg.205968f4825756f74b0bec6574f23961.jpg

C-2.thumb.jpg.f1f87636e23a28573c09e044c083c2b2.jpg

C-3.thumb.jpg.49d9b964b80f087e5d5493ac3e120eb2.jpg

C-4.thumb.jpg.1661d0e45acd67c4d5ba806e0c2da556.jpg

 

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 5
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I order to boycott the Swiss (not really 🙂) I like to try a Seiko (6139-7100). Bit of an iconic 1970's model, nick named "the Helmet". Below sellers pictures and it seems to kinda run ...... according to the sellers watchmaker; ceased due to dried up oil and the seller didn't wanted it serviced, hence sold as defect. Case, glass & original bracelet should be in "super" condition .........

Curious what's under the hood !? 🙂

Seiko-1.thumb.jpg.c21498d773d0938c121abf9468f16772.jpg

Seiko-3.thumb.jpg.3088980b578aca6345a736afc2bb5108.jpg

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 4
Posted (edited)

What I consider ebay "Paydirt" - taking the back off a watch and finding years worth of accumulation of crud around the edges, so it is as previously worn rather than someone else's failure or Frankenstein attempt they are getting shut of.

And even better when you also find an immaculate movement with no sign of rust or chewed up screws!

 

IMG_2238.thumb.jpg.06d3c0d24e0781f93ba068897ee59077.jpg

 

IMG_2235.thumb.jpg.c223c853e19497b6c5346ed6af189943.jpg

 

IMG_2236.thumb.jpg.ddb356a73fb71fae155d087bc025616c.jpg

 

 

 

Another couple I think are fantastic old ones, from an ebay job lot (under £2 each).

They both look like they have been worn to death, with little plating left.

The "Claridge" one (upper) has the date 1922 (or 23) scratched in the back, and the Ingersoll has 2/48/FW in the back. (Is that when it was sold, or serviced)?

The movement in the Claridge looks like it was a reasonably high end one at the time, from the finish? It's also got quite a fancy dial. That one tries to run, but is very sticky.

The Ingersoll is only a pin escapement type, but it's still going strong with good amplitude!

IMG_2250.thumb.jpg.d43c5575a1833414a77e189487ad868e.jpg

 

IMG_2252.thumb.jpg.3e48e46455666fe5f866427e1a38da24.jpg

 

IMG_2253.thumb.jpg.3fd79c7366e60a284ebeb4505d414cdc.jpg

Edited by rjenkinsgb
  • Like 5
Posted

I was searching around for a Lord Matic or King Seiko, so of course I bought a Bulova Sea King. 1972, allegedly running.

Not into the bracelet, but definitely feeling the case and dial.

image.thumb.png.2e270fc34fc232cc46c699b84a857564.png

image.png.01135ce222de20cb3025913699f53c4d.png

image.thumb.png.4fb33db73b86b2d4638e6d4780dbd2f2.png

  • Like 2
Posted
  On 4/12/2024 at 12:46 AM, ManSkirtBrew said:

I was searching around for a Lord Matic or King Seiko, so of course I bought a Bulova Sea King. 1972, allegedly running.

Not into the bracelet, but definitely feeling the case and dial.

image.thumb.png.2e270fc34fc232cc46c699b84a857564.png

image.png.01135ce222de20cb3025913699f53c4d.png

image.thumb.png.4fb33db73b86b2d4638e6d4780dbd2f2.png

Expand  

Nice! I'm a sucker for these. This is one from the "President" line and should have an 11AOACB with a quickset date. Now you have to collect them all 🙂

BulovaPresidents.thumb.jpg.28d03c60dfb89c37e750553e1bef5a68.jpg

Posted

Speaking of Presidents, I happened to be wearing one when this guy arrived in the mail. It looks even better in person.

Unfortunately the quickset doesn't work, and it clearly has the wrong crystal glued in, but for the price I paid I'm happy to fix that.

IMG_20240415_143257.thumb.jpg.c714a4ced784b5f6d24e7bccc98a8708.jpg

  • Like 2
Posted

 

image.png.78f50ef2b42260120f72639625fc7a11.png
Casio MDV106G-1AV Gold DURO200

I'm going on a long family vacation to Southeast Asia this summer and wanted a cheap but reliable beater in case I lose it, break it, or get robbed. Quartz movements aren't my thing, but I'm not dogmatic and this was a cheap option. A few years ago you could buy it for under $50, but since this particular model with the Marlin fish has been discontinued, you have to pay about double that, but I still thought it was acceptable.

Sure, I could wear one of my cheap and very reliable Vostok Amphibian divers watches, but I have a personal relationship with them (having put a lot of work into them) and don't want to risk losing them.

Strangely, I feel very excited. Maybe because I haven't bought a brand-new watch in over 10 years! 😀

The only downside is that this is the watch Bill Gates has been seen wearing, and I'm not exactly a fanboy of Bill Gates. Anyway, who cares!?

  • Like 7
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I just broke my Rule #1 - Do not buy a watch unless you can see a good pic of the movement.

I currently don't have anything to work on (itchy fingers) and as I just got this for £20 from ebay, (sold as "working"), I thought it was worth the gamble.

I liked the look of it, It has 21 jewels, so I'm assuming automatic. The back says "Incabloc" and "waterproof", so it looks to be reasonable quality. The case looks good.

From the little I've found on google, the Credos Lugran company was formed in 1954., and bought by Bucherer in the 60s. This looks 50s-60s to me. There's a reference to using good quality ETA movements. I hope so. 

s-l1600(7).thumb.jpg.9866cbbdef6ffd6914009ed07715a377.jpg

s-l1600.thumb.jpg.c211bd3dd4e95b1c391fa5207c796a1e.jpg

 

 

 

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 2
Posted (edited)
  On 5/6/2024 at 3:16 PM, mikepilk said:

I just broke my Rule #1 - Do not buy a watch unless you can see a good pic of the movement.

s-l1600(7).thumb.jpg.9866cbbdef6ffd6914009ed07715a377.jpg

Expand  

Well it's arrived, and it's a pleasant surprise. A 11.5''' 21 jewel FHF 72. It's running (just) and looks in great condition.  It needs a good service, and new crown and strap. 

It's a front loader but doesn't have a split stem. There's a small lever (visible when you remover the bezel), which when moved, frees the stem and the movement from the case (a new one on me).

20240515_123720.thumb.jpg.61cc3008b56230582d48ca8574332892.jpg

20240515_123657.thumb.jpg.7ee9c136aa184a007d20977130a7ebe5.jpg

 

WIN_20240515_12_39_20_Pro.thumb.jpg.fb65f0312c6eaac970472abc6493153d.jpg

Edited by mikepilk
  • Like 1
Posted
  On 5/15/2024 at 12:00 PM, mikepilk said:

Well it's arrived, and it's a pleasant surprise. A 11.5''' 21 jewel FHF 72. It's running (just) and looks in great condition.  It needs a good service, and new crown and strap. 

It's a front loader but doesn't have a split stem. There's a small lever (visible when you remover the bezel), which when moved, frees the stem and the movement from the case (a new one on me).

20240515_123720.thumb.jpg.61cc3008b56230582d48ca8574332892.jpg

20240515_123657.thumb.jpg.7ee9c136aa184a007d20977130a7ebe5.jpg

 

WIN_20240515_12_39_20_Pro.thumb.jpg.fb65f0312c6eaac970472abc6493153d.jpg

Expand  

The 73 was my setting lever make Mike, same piece fitted to your 72. I enjoyed working on the movement, fair quality.

  On 5/15/2024 at 12:06 PM, Neverenoughwatches said:

The 73 was my setting lever make Mike, same piece fitted to your 72. I enjoyed working on the movement, fair quality.

Expand  

73 wasn't front loading,but a tight spacer ring that i had to fit onto the movement before casing up. I had to adjust endshake on the third wheel  so apart from the make everthing else was good. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Much like @mikepilk, I took a chance on a movement-unseen Citizen Square Custom. If I did my serial decoding right, it should be vintage 1969.

Some discoloration of the dial, but otherwise looks to be in nice shape with the original bracelet. There's a video that shows it running and the price was right, so fingers crossed.

CM6j1UN.thumb.jpeg.e12c72dbbe232b284eaff7e6b4ec4d51.jpeg

SHc6Mjt.thumb.jpeg.72a88a327ab3f349ee74c1d024b10848.jpeg

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Sorry @nickelsilver, I'm just seeing this now.  It is a standard metric screw plate. I followed the suggestion of doing the thread cutting in a pin vise.  It took me forever because the piece is so delicate that I cut and cleared chips very frequently.  But eventually I did get it.  Not pretty, but I got it; the first thing I ever successfully made on the lathe. I cut the screw slot with a jewelers saw.  How can I ensure that the slot is centered on the screw head?
    • Hello and welcome from Leeds, England. 
    • Hello, My name is David and I’m a vintage watch collector/ wanna be hobbyist watchmaker from France. I really want to progress into my watch repairing hobby. For now, I’m only having fun servicing my own watches and spare movements, simple small 3 hands from the 50s (Omega, eterna…) Learning step by step or at least trying to 🙂
    • More setbacks and successes...  After letting the watch run in (but before I fixed the BE) a chunk of the radium lume fell off one of the hands and pulverized leaving radioactive dust all over the dial 😞 ☢️ ☠️ So before I could continue further I decided I would remove the radium lume.  I have removed radium lume from hands before where it was already starting to flake away but this time I had to work out what I was going to do with debris on the dial.  I decided that getting everything under water and removing all the lume was probably the best way to go. So here is what I did... I put an essence jar I use for cleaning parts and filled it with water and put it into a big ziplock bag along with the tools I would need - a sharpened piece of pegwood and  a 0.80mm screwdriver  -  I put on a pair of nitrile gloves and a covid style mask and then opened the back of the watch. Now with the back off the watch I could do the rest inside the bag.  I removed the watch from the case and removed the hands from the dial (through the bag) and then undid the dial screws and removed the dial from the movement.  I then put the hands and the dial and the watch case into the water and removed the movement from the bag.  Carefully and slowly with one hand in the bag and one hand trying to poke and hold stuff through the bag I gently rubbed away the lume from the dial and hands with the pegwood. I then took the parts out of the water and removed the jar from the bag (leaving the parts still in the bag) - with the majority of the dangerous stuff now in the water I disposed of this (down the toilet) and gave the jar a good rinse in running water before refilling it and returning it to the bag where I gave all the parts another rinse in the new water.  I then took the parts and put the geiger counter over the top of them and looked at them carefully under UV light to see if there were any flakes still hanging on. I dried everything with some kitchen towel. Once I was finished will all that I remved the parts from then removed the gloves and put them in the bag with the paper towels and the pegwood and thew the bag in the household waste. Finally I gave the dial, hands and case another rinse in the sink under running water.  I didn't bother following up with a rinse in distilled water water because the water here is pretty clear of limescale etc and I find it doesn't mark! So here are the results of my weekends work! Timegrapher dial down (dial up is almost the same) The fixed shock setting New crystal - and lume removed from dial and hands
    • Hi and welcome! I'm new here too—greetings from Leicester, UK.
×
×
  • Create New...