Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
On 2/13/2022 at 9:32 PM, spectre6000 said:

OK, so it's viable, the question is how much would it take to make it worthwhile? I'm thinking years' worth of cast off cases and bracelets here. Not looking for any quick return, just another fun aspect of this weird bifurcated hobby. How many watches/bracelets worth went into getting that 2 grams?

I am not quite sure been a while.

It was quite a lot.

I had 30 motherboards about 60 AMD cpu's and quite a bit of memory bars around 200 or so.

 

 

 

 

Edited by Tony13
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

It takes quite a lot of plated and rolled gold items to get enough worth recovering. Back in the day when I worked for a company doing board level repairs and servicing I had much more access to the kind of computer scrap that might have been worth while. These days, hardly any gold is used, and most of the contacts are much smaller, so you need more stuff to make it worth your while. Having said that, some people make a living from it, so it is possible, but hard work.


 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted (edited)

AsPurchased-l1600.thumb.jpg.d3ece85b63bf496e00fea3073659c4b2.jpg

Having said all that, if you keep your eyes open you do still find the occasional pieces of scrap gold. I picked a ladies 18ct Omega case back a while back, in a job lot. I hadn't even spotted it in the listing, it just turned up in the box of assorted watches and movements. Not worth a huge amount, but probably something north of sixty pounds in scrap, which given that the job lot cost less than four, was a bit of a bargain.

Speaking of job lots (and 404 club stuff), this lot came in at two pounds for the four watches, or fifty pence each, plus shipping. I really only bid for the American Waltham, as I don't have a good clean example.

I have a couple of very scruffy Waltham calibres and a couple of cases in need of some TLC. That dial looks immaculate, so hopefully I can get it running and cased up in a genuine period correct case. Time will tell.

AsPurchasedRear-l1600.thumb.jpg.ec55fdfcccf6406396737b8298075f5c.jpg


As I say, I'm optimistic about having a suitable case for the seven jewel American Waltham, which dates from some time between August 1895 and May 1899. These are not particularly rare with approximately 350 thousand of this particular mechanism produced.

None the less, clean running version are still very collectable, and can fetch hundreds of pounds depending on style condition and case material. Waltham movements were often re branded and cased by local  American jewellers, as you can see if you follow the link.

There is a high probability that the reason the mechanism is orphaned is because someone scrapped the case, since it was probably worth more than the watch at the time. Some of the Walthams did come in silver,  rolled gold and even solid gold cases.

 

The Medana may well be a cheap pin lever in a nickel silver case, but the enamel dial on that also looks pristine. I guess there is a very slim chance it might be jewelled and that case might be silver, but I have my doubts.

The no name *might* be gold plated, but that is a very long shot.

The Ingersoll might also be recoverable, but that is not a high priority.

I will of course keep you all posted if I manage to bring any of them back to life.

Edited by AndyHull
Posted

I'm not all that familiar with the history of Ingersoll, but in my mind they immediately get flushed into the "ignore" pile because they seem to universally be unjeweled pin levers. That's fully jeweled though, and likely the nicest Ingersoll I've seen (again though, I mostly see the name and move on). From that photo, it looks like the movement is very tidy and businesslike. The balance looks a bit chintzy, but aside from that it's got a charm to it... 

  • Like 2
Posted

I have a few Ingersoll and they are a mixed bunch in terms of movement quality.

I've included a couple of zero jewel 404 club examples below.

RIMG0032.thumb.JPG.866798c7e1a658f56b6517546cb7bbd1.JPG

 

RIMG0053.thumb.JPG.f3fe8ab702ad9093d1a45e9783ed366f.JPG

Don't dismiss them out of hand, some of them are actually pretty nice, even if they are a little short on rubies.
 

  • Like 1
Posted

Richt on Andy. because they are the lower end of the market like the Timex a lot of people dismiss them (watch Snobbery) there are exaples of them like times being abused and still running. Thery were similar to the smiths enpire and others of that era, built for the working man at a price they could afford as a daily wear. Pin lever watches had a job to do and did it well. Me  I like them.

  • Like 1
Posted

FTR, I wasn't saying I look down my nose at them, just that when I'm 404 hunting, they get scrolled past along with the Japanese, Russian, etc. watches. Not what I'm after. I've had at least a handful of Ingersolls. 

Posted

I won an auction for a very large number of watches from a watchmakers estate. The total cost was around $1,500 but there were easily around 1,000 to 1,500 watches, not all of them complete.  They came organized in several large dresser drawers sorted by movement.  It's been months and I'm still going through all the watches. I come across one that sparks my interest and then go down the rabbit hole looking into a watch brand I've never heard of, so I still have quite a few to figure out exactly what's in all the little envelopes. Not sure if that counts for the 404 club though.

 

812704832_watchlot.thumb.jpg.f5bfd6f044bab8607524f61dfb99dcf3.jpg

 

 

 

  • Like 4
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Have you found one that made the purchase worth it?  Sounds like a dollar per watch more or less.

I've come across a number that I've been setting aside but have not yet photographed (including a couple of 1940's Longines Sei Tacche watches). A couple that I have taken pictures of:

 

This Movado in a stainless steel Francois Borgel case. I found an ad that called it an "Acvatic"

Watch.thumb.jpg.e1f348c85606d90daaf67bd101be54ca.jpg

 

I'm a sucker for alarm watches so I really dig this Vulcain:

Vulcain.thumb.jpg.d29ff20e46357ddd561c196b96206407.jpg

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 3
Posted

That's a helluva haul! Hopefully there are a few more gems in there for $1500, but that seems pretty likely.
 

At a minimum (business brain kicking in), you could supply affordable assortments of practice movements for people on the forum here for a reasonable price, and easily come out ahead as long as the majority are reasonably complete or are at least in multiples that are differently incomplete.

Posted (edited)

I picked up a little no name key wind cylinder escapement pocket watch movement for £1

If I can get it to run, I may have a case for it. If not, it can sit in the stash.

AsPurchasedDial-l1600.thumb.jpg.60a739225e853cc07b512031eb2e4d2e.jpg

 

AsPurchasedRear-l1600.thumb.jpg.fcffa03af94ed32295ec7ee3a349233e.jpg

I like the elegantly simple enamel  dial, and the fact that it is anonymous is intriguing. There may be some identification marks under the dial, and I'll try to remember to post a few pics of the teardown and re-assembly. Its a bit of a shame that the hour hand is damaged, but I guess for a pound, you can't complain.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Posted

I guess the key sets it as well via the center square. Is there a jewel under that screwed on plate with the setting square in the middle? Also, that balance looks interesting... I don't think we get watches like that over here....

Posted

It's a called a 5 bar movement very common. spectre6000 no jewel in the center bar where you set the hands from. Movements are Swiss and made more or less on the Swiss french border, some people mistake them as french movements.  

Posted (edited)
15 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

It's a called a 5 bar movement very common. spectre6000 no jewel in the center bar where you set the hands from. Movements are Swiss and made more or less on the Swiss french border, some people mistake them as french movements.  

The design is pretty common. It is a little unusual in that there doesn't appear to be any makers mark, but I guess it may be under the dial. It hasn't arrived yet, but I'll keep you all posted if I spot anything interesting when it arrives. @oldhippyWhat would you suggest is the age of it

@spectre6000 You can see a broadly similar movement in action here.
 

 

 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted (edited)

Just for good measure, here is another similar mechanism. This time it is a lever rather than a cylinder escapement, and this one is much finer quality. You should probably also watch part 1 to see the tear down for cleaning.
 

 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted (edited)

While we are on the subject of pocket watches, you might also like this minute repeater video.

Sadly I suspect it is well outside of the budget of the 404 club, however we can but dream.

 

Edited by AndyHull
Posted
On 2/20/2022 at 7:13 AM, AndyHull said:

I have a few Ingersoll and they are a mixed bunch in terms of movement quality.

I've included a couple of zero jewel 404 club examples below.

Don't dismiss them out of hand, some of them are actually pretty nice, even if they are a little short on rubies.
 

Nice, I like the looks of both of those.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

Thanks.

AsPurchased2.jpg.f2f80646746ce17d3721734f49c565d7.jpg


Here is another Ingersoll, this time a 17 jewelled movement that I picked up a while back.

AsPurchased1.thumb.jpg.eacf5e5bdbb22e5b750118372e08c2c8.jpg

 

I can't find any pictures of it after I cleaned and serviced it. These are from the auction listing.


As you can see, it is in the form of a tab, pin brooch/fob, or nurses watch, but I may tempted to re-case it in a wristwatch case, as the original case is nothing special, but the dial and hands are very nice.

I guess if it had been in a wristwatch case, then it wouldn't have been on the 404 club radar.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Posted

It seems that there may have been some "re-branding" of PU (or perhaps cardboard) fake leather here in India. 
I see quite a few of the low cost watch bands are being marketed as "vegan" leather.

image.png.740fcf416c212085886a298989953a0a.png

Now to the best of my knowledge, while veganism shuns animal based products, there is no such thing as "vegan" leather.

Artificial leather, yes, vegan... not so much, especially since I can almost guarantee that these watches use petroleum based alternatives to leather, which are arguably as bad for the environment as the leather industry is. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The watch is from 1990 and was serviced just once around 20 years ago. No idea if the mainspring barrel was ever opened or changed before now.
    • Interesting but I think we have a problem here? We probably need to split hairs on a definition problem. For instance take a real Rolex movement put it in a real Rolex case but not the one it came in take a real dial real hands and make up a watch that is 100% real and what exactly is this? If you send your Rolex in for servicing and anything's been changed at all from what it was when it left the factory Rolex will be unhappy and remove all offending components. This does become a problem of people changing things because they think it's their watch and they want to have a different dial Lord diamonds the bezel or whatever words Rolex sees all of this as evil and bad as far as a Intel Rolex only things the watch is legit if everything is exactly what it was when it left the factory and nothing's been changed including the stem everything asked me Rolex original or their very unhappy about its existence. Then you think about a fake watch what is its real purpose? Well its real purpose is to make money for somebody and fool the customer. So all the watch has to do is look pleasant on the outside and inside can be anything. Typically nobody's going to see inside. So typically anything that's not legit counterfeit movement etc. why would someone spend so much time and effort making it look just like a real Rolex when there's no need to? Unless of course you have one or two movements to impress somebody with this is what's inside your watch but even that is problematic Now we don't end up with I've interesting problem that troubles me where I work. The owner will offend a cage your watch by looking at it carefully with a microscope the timing machine etc. and he will point out all the things that he feels are not appropriate correct or whatever for your watch. But in my example above of mixing and matching legitimate Rolex parts he wouldn't necessarily be able to tell. The problem I have with this is it often times things like his claim to telling a counterfeit is look at the second hand the quality of the secondhand is not as nice as a legitimate one. But maybe somebody replaced a second hand on a real Rolex. Or the other day at work I don't know what it was in before but there was a really pretty movement transparent back and they decided it was fake because of? Now I didn't think it was fake I took one look was beautifully manufactured but they had a reason What bothers me with counterfeit Rolex is or anything counterfeit watch related it is reminding me of a witchhunt. The early days of witch hunting how can we tell a which Manon which? That makes me wonder how many super fakes are really fake at all it's basically somebody deciding it's a fake based upon inappropriate assumptions. Like the secondhand is been changed or the watch was worked on the screws are perfect or other things. Other minor problems with super fakes for instance I have a long story the not going to tell the short version is I found the website once where they claim to be counterfeiting Rolex watches. They even had a picture to prove their counterfeit watch the problem with pictures online how do we know it's really a counterfeit watch and not a real Rolex watch that you're telling us is counterfeit. Oh and they had testimonials from all kinds of people who bought their watches and were very happy with the service of course the problem with the watch is you don't know what's inside it unless you take the back off and just because somebody shows a picture online and says this is their super fake maybe it really isn't a super fake they be there just trying to say that. We end up with a interesting problem of manufacturing a watch. Does Rolex actually make every single part found in their watch? Then the year 2004's basically irrelevant. This is because initially Rolex buys stock in the company and they manufacture Rolex watches. I'm assuming over time Rolex will acquire more stock and only in 2004 do they get the whole company. But the company itself hasn't really changed other than the name on the front of the building. The real question is did they really make every single component found in the Rolex watch from the beginning of time until end of the time? A lot of the components found in a watch would be extremely specialized did they make their own jewels or their own mainsprings for instance? But that is looking at the article they employ a heck of a lot of people now I would guess now that Rolex probably does make everything in-house. Especially when they have nifty CNC equipment like for making screws were he could make a huge batch of one type it instantly switch to another type where before he needed specialized machines for one machine for one screw now manufacturing all kinds of stuff in-house becomes very simple. But still is possible that in the early days they might have outsourced something may be perhaps. But conceivably we do have minor changes in thing is due to how things have been made over time which can lead to confusions over whether this is legit or not when it may be as a change of manufacturing methods oh and regarding the screws found in your Rolex watch? In about mid-80s I went to a school reunion in Switzerland. One of things we could do was visit a factory and I picked Rolex because I wanted to see the mass production making of Rolex watches. Which is very disappointed I did not get the sea at all because didn't see them making Rolex watches in their Geneva headquarters even though the building is really fake? So what did we get to see well after sales service because after all were watchmakers we should see that. Did learn something interesting about Rolex screws if your watch was sent to Rolex the screws that come back are not the ones that went there. As they are using powered screwdrivers they don't want to risk breaking heads off and they will replace the screws of every single watch. The other one of interest was suppose there's a scratch and you can see the brass? No problem they have a solution that basically electoral plates without electricity so the scratch goes away. The research Department was quite boring and didn't look like anyone was ever there. Then it was too long ago to remember all the details other than I was disappointed I want to see manufacturing.   Yes the joys of artificial intelligence that is more like a trained monkey that's there to please you.
    • Hey everybody! I just registered to WRT. I found this forum searching for informations about ELMA watch cleaning machines (will get one ELMA tomorrow ✌️). I'm new in watch repair, collecting watch repair tools to fill up my work space 😎.   Greetings from Vienna Michael
    • Is it not covered in the manual under Profix Cap Jewels?
×
×
  • Create New...