Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I am working on an Elgin pocket watch grade 312.  It was an estate sale purchase and was not running when purchased.  I assumed that it was not running because it was very dirty and thought cleaning would solve all the problems.  I completely disassembled it and ran it through an ultrasound cleaner and rinse. It came out bright and shiny and when I started to reassemble for the first time I saw that there was NO roller jewel!  
So, what now? Can the roller jewel be replaced by a person with very modest ability?  I am including two pictures of the balance and roller plate.  I do not see any sign of where it was attached.  
Thanks in advance for any guidance.  
Bill H.

44FAEF5D-B387-44BB-AE73-14257891DE79.jpeg

E381A02E-3FEF-406B-8F86-D1354360BE9E.jpeg

  • Confused 1
Posted

As Nucejoe said  replacing it requires some shellac and a new roller jewel, thats the simple bit  fitting it in the right position is another matter.  It has to be vertical and in the correct location to drive the pallet.   Therefor the suggestion of a new roller with jewel is the practical solution and will cause you less grief.   cheers

  • Like 1
Posted

Your options are few I'm afraid @Bill3. Your best bet is to either acquire a complete balance with the roller table and jewel already installed, or find a donor movement with a good balance. If by chance you find just the table with a jewel, you set the jewel perpendicular to the "spokes" of the balance wheel away from the balance cock. See the image below for reference.

Waltham-Pocket-Watch-Balance-Cock-And-Wheel-12-_57.thumb.jpg.b4bf24e2cd7bc531e383113f29e302d1.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted

I see the pic now, just opened. Missing the roller too.  Lucky you are in the US, not many were  marketted in my neck of the woods.

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

Always interesting problems with old American pocket watches. Roller jewel's can fall out the entire roller table cannot. This means somebody's worked on this watch prior to you and left pieces missing.

Unlike modern watches finding replacement parts is problematic. I have a website below you can find a parts list but you'll notice even for the roller jewel a reference that the size varied. Even if you had a roller table with the jewel it might not even fit. A balance complete would be a better option but you're going to have to adjust the escapement to fit the new balance because the sizes will be a little different. Even though these are mass made watches they were still hands adjusted and had variations in size throughout their production.

 

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

  • Thanks 1
Posted
48 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Always interesting problems with old American pocket watches. Roller jewel's can fall out the entire roller table cannot. This means somebody's worked on this watch prior to you and left pieces missing.

Unlike modern watches finding replacement parts is problematic. I have a website below you can find a parts list but you'll notice even for the roller jewel a reference that the size varied. Even if you had a roller table with the jewel it might not even fit. A balance complete would be a better option but you're going to have to adjust the escapement to fit the new balance because the sizes will be a little different. Even though these are mass made watches they were still hands adjusted and had variations in size throughout their production.

 

http://www.elginwatchparts.com/

Very true. However, if the OP gets a donor movement from the same series, it should in theory be a drop in item. 

The link below is for a donor movement for under $30., I recommend you contact the seller to confirm the balance is good. 

https://www.ebay.com/itm/193330534646

Posted

Dave’s watch parts also could have a roller table with jewel installed. I have fixed many jewels and it’s not a beginner job. You need the proper tool to hold and heat up the roller table and the flake of shellac placed on the roller table jewel hole. Go see:

https://www.daveswatchparts.com/



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Posted

This is an update on my missing roller jewel.  I had already looked for the roller jewel in the rinse solution, but looked for the first time on the drying rack.  AND THERE IT WAS!  It was still mounted in the roller table.  See the picture below.  Now I have two new problems; how to make the roller table to stay on and how to orient it so that it interacts with the pallet fork in the appropriate manner.

Many thanks to all who have responded to my plea for help.  Every response was helpful.

Bill H.

 

 

F7843273-8C2B-4F63-B8A1-FAA5702CD87E.jpeg

Posted

 Mobile stud carrier lets you bring the impulse jewel "in beat" . The picture FLwatchguy posted above shows impulse jewel is to make a right angle with balance spoke, ie: perpendicular to the spoke. 

You best remove the balance complete and hairspring, to put the roller on staff, need to set the wheel on anvil and tap the roller tight in place.

 

 

Posted

This is a very old watch, with single roller table, no mobile stud holder. Seems the jewel is happy where it is, that the roller table came off is a sign the hole is too large and yes a domed punch can close it so it frictions on well. Go slowly, when it seats on the staff with light pressure and the remaining distance to go is equal to the roller table thickness it's right, you can seat it fully.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you don't want to modify your roller table to fit the staff you could use superglue. As a wild guess that's why it fell off in the cleaning machine. Whoever staffed it before you didn't use quite the right staff and they just superglue did on.

Posted
This is a very old watch, with single roller table, no mobile stud holder. Seems the jewel is happy where it is, that the roller table came off is a sign the hole is too large and yes a domed punch can close it so it frictions on well. Go slowly, when it seats on the staff with light pressure and the remaining distance to go is equal to the roller table thickness it's right, you can seat it fully.

And use a domed punch with a gap for the jewel.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
If you don't want to modify your roller table to fit the staff you could use superglue. As a wild guess that's why it fell off in the cleaning machine. Whoever staffed it before you didn't use quite the right staff and they just superglue did on.

Noooooooooop!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Posted
3 hours ago, jdrichard said:

Noooooooooop!

If are going to get technical about it I disapprove of closing the hole in the roller table until we know why you have to close the hole. In other words if somebody has replaced the balance staff with the wrong sized staff modifying watch parts to fit that is not appropriate. So modifying parts will mean someday in the future someone might have the correct balance staff and ponder why the roller table doesn't fit. This is why superglue is harmless as you're not modifying the part. Ideally you should probably replace the balance staff with something correct.

Posted
15 hours ago, jdrichard said:


Noooooooooop!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

  Again, super glue raises it's ugly head !  I know of no good use for it,  if you must glue ---  use epoxy  vin

Posted (edited)
17 hours ago, vinn3 said:

  Again, super glue raises it's ugly head !  I know of no good use for it,  if you must glue ---  use epoxy  vin

Obviously a Bit off-topic; "but as for knowing no good use for it", perhaps talk to the aviation industry ?;

"Gluing a Plane Together

It is not widely known by the general public that aircraft wings are usually glued on to the plane, not riveted, bolted, or using some other mechanical fasteners. Which means that a thin layer of polymeric material is what is holding the plane up in the sky. It's not the wing or the engine or the Bernoulli principle [1], it's the polymer adhesive."

Super glue is a classic example of a polymer adhesive. Last, after all other options failed, I had no other option than to Super-glue a chrono seconds recorder hand to it's pipe bushing ..... holds up perfectly.

I wouldn't say as a "standard" procedure, but in some case .......... :rolleyes:

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Posted
If are going to get technical about it I disapprove of closing the hole in the roller table until we know why you have to close the hole. In other words if somebody has replaced the balance staff with the wrong sized staff modifying watch parts to fit that is not appropriate. So modifying parts will mean someday in the future someone might have the correct balance staff and ponder why the roller table doesn't fit. This is why superglue is harmless as you're not modifying the part. Ideally you should probably replace the balance staff with something correct.

I would make a new balance staff


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
  • Like 1
Posted

I am sure that you are right, making a new balance staff is the "technically perfect" way to do this repair.  However, that is beyond my modest ability.  I have a lathe and do easy  things like repivot a clock spindal, but I have never made a balance staff.  I am leaning towards the super glue solution.  

Thanks to all who have participated in this discussion.

Bill H. 

Posted
5 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Obviously a Bit off-topic; "but as for knowing no good use for it", perhaps talk to the aviation industry ?;

"Gluing a Plane Together

It is not widely known by the general public that aircraft wings are usually glued on to the plane, not riveted, bolted, or using some other mechanical fasteners. Which means that a thin layer of polymeric material is what is holding the plane up in the sky. It's not the wing or the engine or the Bernoulli principle [1], it's the polymer adhesive."

Super glue is a classic example of a polymer adhesive. Last, after all other options failed, I had no other option than to Super-glue a chrono seconds recorder hand to it's pipe bushing ..... holds up perfectly.

I wouldn't say as a "standard" procedure, but in some case .......... :rolleyes:

  epoxy is good up to 200 deg. far.  super glue is not.   vin

Posted

You align the table so that the jewel is perpendicular to the "spokes" of the balance. You face the jewel away from the cock. Please see the picture below for reference. 

20200229_114712.jpg.bd81a5968d1d4994e0509c479f479359.jpg

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

In order to put this in beat, you will need to move the hairspring collet. It's a tedious and delicate process. Mark made a video specifically highlighting this.

 

Edited by FLwatchguy73
  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have a little milling attachment for my WW lathe, but very rarely use it and not for wheel and pinion cutting. For that I use a small Sixis 101 milling machine. I normally do direct dividing, but sometimes have to do an odd count and use the universal index which also fits on the Sixis.   Back in the day when I didn't have a mill, I would cut gearing on my Schaublin 102. It has a universal dividing attachment which fits the back of the spindle. Both it and the one for the Sixis are 60:1 ratio, and with the set of 4  index plates I can do almost any division. When I've had to do a strange high count prime number, I print a disc with the needed division and just place the plunger on the dot. Any position error is reduced by a factor of 60 so still plenty accurate.   The machines are a mess in the pics as I'm in the process of making a batch of barrels for a wristwatch 🙃.   This is the Sixis. The head can also be placed vertically, as can the dividing spindle.   Dividing plates. The smaller ones fit another dividing spindle.   Universal divider for the Sixis. I put it together with parts from an odd Sixis spindle that takes w20 collets, like the Schaublin 102, and a dividing attachment from a Schaublin mill.     The dividing attachment for the 102. The gear fits in place of the handwheel at the back of the headstock.   And the little milling attachment for the WW lathe. I just set it on the slide rest to illustrate the size, you can see from the dust on it it really doesn't get used much. I think only when I change bearing in the head, to kiss the collet head seat (grinding wheel still in the milling attachment).
    • I read a lot about the quality (or lack thereof) of Seiko's 4R, 6R, 8L  movements...or more specifically the lack of regulation from the factory. Especially when compared to similar priced manufactures using SW200's or ETA's. I thought I'd ask those more in the know, do the 4R's and 6R's deserve their bad reputation, is it fairly easy for someone with minimal skills (or better yet a trained watch mechanic) to dial in these movements to a more acceptable performance.    For background I spent more on a 1861 Speedy years ago, expecting that the advertised 0-15s/d  would probably perform more like 5-7s/d. In reality it's been closed to 2-4s/d. 
    • @ChrisInOz your not Chris as in Clickspring are you?🤪 looks similar to some solutions I have seen him do.   Tom
    • Potentially not the right place to post this and it's one of those where I'm not looking for a solution but rather thought you'd like to see it... Picked up a sketchy looking 6105-8000 the other day, the dial on which I've never seen the likes of before... The paint has literally solidified and lifted away from the dial in places, I'm some parts completely (and has been touched up with a matte black).  I showed it to someone who works on and has a healthy obsession with these things - they told me they've seen this before on less than a handful of old Seiko dials, and think it's caused by water sitting on the sides and corrosion.  It's quite a mess, but at least most of it is still there! Not sure about that relume either, though I should add I went to this eyes wide open price wise and the rest of the watch is good.  Pics:  
×
×
  • Create New...