Jump to content

Any experience with this kind of case?


avion

Recommended Posts

I've worked on these cases..

The movement fits into a caseback and the crystal is fitted on the caseback. Then the whole assembly is press fitted into the upper case.

First check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem (in case my memory is faulty!). Then press on the crystal while supporting the lugs. If you're using your thumbs be aware that it can 'let go' suddenly.

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Ishima - no it's definitely not a screw type

@anilv - I'm not sure what you mean by "check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem". I'd be surprise if the method of pressing the crystal should be applied here since it's stated on the baseback " Benrus #2155 - Remove with blade"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

If the back doesn’t come off, then it comes out from the front. It will have a two-piece stem. You pull the stem, lift off the glass and the movement can be taken out.

thanks. So something like in:

 

from minute 1:05

I need to use the blade after to take the bezel out ?

If so, I shall check if the stem is indeed a two-piece stem and let you know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, anilv said:

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

I'm glad to know that it's not just me. I've been going nuts trying to find a crystal to fit what looks to be a ladies Sea-Hawk, possibly aka, "Mermaid", for this type case. What makes it difficult for me is that the, at least arguably, most important dimension is the ID of the crystal, not the OD, as is the usual case. I've tried a couple of different sizes, without the step, and I'm getting close, but still don't have the dial covered yet. :-(  I don't remember it being as difficult with my men's Sea Hawk. But this ladies version is a tough one.

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like. I have the tool, but still no crystal. Good luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MrRoundel said:

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like.

The press is to close the case, but to open it you go around the case back seam with a sharp blade. A normal "case knife" won't work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 3:39 PM, vinn3 said:

first verify that you have a "two part" stem.  or take the crystal out with the "claw tool"  as illustrated above.  vin

After giving it a few shots I'm quite positive that this is not a two parts stem :/

Any other suggestions? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Some two-piece stems are sods to pull out. I used my nippers, pull the button out to set hands and with nippers behind give one hell of a tug.

 

I used nippers and strong leverage. If it's a two parts, then it must be glued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the original image of the back of the watch, and the fact that the "Benrus" is slightly askew, I'm pretty convinced that this is a conventional "back-loader". It would be unforgivable of Benrus to have a crooked logo on the back of a one-piece front-loader, no? Of course, I  don't know that there weren't some sort of two-piece front-loaders made. If that's the case, I'm back to not-quite-square one.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It shouldn't be attached    The pinions look independent of each other, not in alignment,  but the clip is bothering me or have you just placed that on the pivot end? 
    • What this extra disk next to the pinion? Thats not part of the assembly 
    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
×
×
  • Create New...