Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I rejected this request and sent a copy to Mark as a "ticket" because I thought it contravened forum rules and in effect was spam. For the first time with a "member" I have chosen to ignore the content.  If Mark comes back granting approval I will review the posting but it does not seem to be anything I would be interested in.

Vic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I hope you consulted with Mark Lovic who owns the forum before making this post?

 

 

I rejected this request and sent a copy to Mark as a "ticket" because I thought it contravened forum rules and in effect was spam. For the first time with a "member" I have chosen to ignore the content.  If Mark comes back granting approval I will review the posting but it does not seem to be anything I would be interested in.

Vic

 

 

Not sure i will even open the link before it is approved? How nows what it could be ? 

We are not doing SPAM, We've a few cooperation with other forum too if you are not believe me this 

http://www.thewatchforum.co.uk/index.php?/topic/111934-need-feedback-my-microwatches/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regardless, this is advertising, however you put it. And the forum rules are that you have to get permission from the forum owner Mark Lovic, which it sounds like you don't have. 

Your product/company might interest us but I wont be opening that link until a mod or Mark confirms this is allowed to be here. The rules are there to ensure the integrity and quality of this forum, so if we're a little hostile, understand it's only because we care about the forum and don't want it to be miss-used. 

Edited by Ishima
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't be opening this if I was anyone on the forum! A shortened (= anonymised) URL purporting to come from a "Jeff Founder Esquire" where "Jeff Founder Esquire" (as a phrase) has zero hits other than on this site... 

Things that make you go hmmm... :thumbsd:

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All links and content removed. We take a dim view here of members who sign up with a sole agenda for promoting their wares, much much better to become an established and respected member of the community by contributing in a meaningful way like everybody else does :)

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
×
×
  • Create New...