Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 2018-04-15 at 4:29 AM, anilv said:

Wearing a Fortis 'True-line' this Sunday. 

It's an automatic with an ETA 2452 inside. Bought it cheap a few years back as it was not running,  a service and it's running fine. It had a generic crown which I swapped out for a used original I had around.

Screenshot_2018-04-15-10-17-24-79.thumb.png.953e36d96d02a7a7d75824ccf16c7771.png

It has shrouded lugs which is a nice design feature and with the date at 1 o'clock it's quite a unique watch. 

Screenshot_2018-04-15-10-17-35-50.thumb.png.a705e152d8ff50afdc19108a29c08fde.png

Foetus is a brand rich in historynd their recent models are quite ice but is sad that they had to declare bankruptcy last year..  Hope they make it through. 

Anilv 

Reminds me a lot of this recent acquisition, something about the case shape and dial really works for me.
IMG_20180417_103405_1.thumb.jpg.fe134b13584715ae0745b217650eb880.jpg
 

  • Like 3
Posted

Wow.. this Seiko is practically NOS. Can you share a picture of the caseback?

TIA

 

16 hours ago, Tipsy said:

Reminds me a lot of this recent acquisition, something about the case shape and dial really works for me.
IMG_20180417_103405_1.thumb.jpg.fe134b13584715ae0745b217650eb880.jpg
 

 

Posted

WOW.. you pratically never see those Sealions as they're usually worn off. Nice one Tipsy!

 

16 hours ago, Tipsy said:

IMG_20180418_090535.thumb.jpg.89d879567f5ed1e603cd87151f9fa897.jpg

 

Posted (edited)

Another Seiko from about the same time as the one above - Skyliner 6220 - 7970.

First watch I took apart, keeper that do not get that much wrist-time.

IMG_20180424_193302.thumb.jpg.a9d0870039b025955a3471c1424ae098.jpg

Edited by Tipsy
  • Like 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, ricardopalamino said:

I've been wearing this one for the last 2 days...

 

5ae09e7eae799_ScreenShot2018-04-25at9_26_45AM.thumb.png.5c29bf1f362ec6d77792928830905d83.png

Oh nice Sicura! Does this have the venerable gold standard of pin pallets--BFG 158 31/7?

J

Posted (edited)
54 minutes ago, noirrac1j said:

Oh nice Sicura! Does this have the venerable gold standard of pin pallets--BFG 158 31/7?

J

Hi Joe ,  I don't know much about these watches so I opened the caseback to take a peek and I did see the number 158 under the balance wheel ,...so I guess it is as you described .

 

5ae0af97d09a3_ScreenShot2018-04-25at10_38_44AM.thumb.png.0fd819f9c8113d419f4fbfa5e7f7c313.png

 

 

5ae0afe09f663_ScreenShot2018-04-25at10_39_52AM.thumb.png.194405ea122306780982d3fb0b6a6c86.png

 

Edited by ricardopalamino
Posted

Yes it does! Its a good, strong movement that is relatively straightforward to overhaul. Your example looks nice & clean. It will probably many years of service, but If you ever need spare parts, I have plenty.

J

Posted
5 hours ago, noirrac1j said:

Yes it does! Its a good, strong movement that is relatively straightforward to overhaul. Your example looks nice & clean. It will probably many years of service, but If you ever need spare parts, I have plenty.

J

Thanks Joe , Good to know you have my back on these parts .

The Best ,

Louis

Posted

Hi Tipsy,

Nice Skyliner! Your post made me dig out mine and give it some wrist time. its not as nice as yours though but in actual use the wear in the dial is not really an issue.

I haven't opened it up as its working fine. Serial number dates it form July '67 which makes it 51 years old!

IMG20180427142153.thumb.jpg.889fce3cb67f31df8f071df967d2d923.jpg

IMG20180427142207.thumb.jpg.ac77b150cd6d65cf8cd374a20a531539.jpg

 

On 4/25/2018 at 1:51 AM, Tipsy said:

Another Seiko from about the same time as the one above - Skyliner 6220 - 7970.

First watch I took apart, keeper that do not get that much wrist-time.

IMG_20180424_193302.thumb.jpg.a9d0870039b025955a3471c1424ae098.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, anilv said:

Hi Tipsy,

Nice Skyliner! Your post made me dig out mine and give it some wrist time. its not as nice as yours though but in actual use the wear in the dial is not really an issue.

I haven't opened it up as its working fine. Serial number dates it form July '67 which makes it 51 years old!

IMG20180427142153.thumb.jpg.889fce3cb67f31df8f071df967d2d923.jpg

IMG20180427142207.thumb.jpg.ac77b150cd6d65cf8cd374a20a531539.jpg

 

 

Nice, the serial number on mine is 7700053 and when I run it to check - it also was made in Jul 67. There are some true vintage gems right before the quartz crisis.

Posted

Sorry.. I made a mistake.. mine is Jul 66.

As a point of interest, any Seiko with a 7-digit serial number was made before 1970.

Cheers!

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I am puzzled by something a snipped out something from your image and what exactly disassemble tell us? my confusion is the symbol for FHF looks like image I have below year symbol as a star and righted this instant are not finding what that means? I suppose we could use the fingerprint system to verify it really is what it claimed to be. Size itself is really interesting there's almost no watches in that particular size. Then were missing details in the photograph above like diameter of movements to verify it really is the size and are missing the setting components.   went to the bestfit book looking at the symbols didn't see it. Look at the link below I did find it back to the bestfit book and yes it really is there https://reference.grail-watch.com/documents/history-of-ebauches-sa/ then bestfit book says lists the size as 10 1/2. one of the problems with vintage watches is finding parts yes a donor watch would be good.
    • Actually, this could be the issue. Drag from the module could be overcoming the cannon pinion. It was definitely not at the point that the driving wheel was loose on the cannon pinion, it took a little bit of effort to rotate it when applying the grease. Maybe I need to look again at applying oil to the pivots.    Yeah, it's very annoying. I don't want to give up on it, so back on with it over again until I catch a break. 
    • The sping is not pushing directly on the cap, but is pushing against the spindle. So, even if the usual black cap is replaced with the micrometer cap, the spindle is still pushed up.
    • But he tells that the micrometer cap doesn't screw into the spindle. How can the spring push the spindle up if there's nothing to grip? There is a screw visible on top of the micrometer cap so should it be able to screw into the spindle? I'm feeling really dumb now. Does anyone manufacture that cap as an aftermarket item? Might be worth investing. Ok so the spindle is different, now I get it.
    • I suppose? If it worked before and it doesn't work now I guess the question would be why does it not work now? That would come back to if you did not have the chronograph module on will it work or is the chronograph module sucking too much power out of the watch basically 99 usually when they go bad you can hold on the tube part and usually just spin the wheel because it has zero holding at all so usually when they go bad they go bad very bad. You should build hotel when you set the watch as to whether it seems to have any friction or not. I'm just wondering if the chronograph module is the problem.
×
×
  • Create New...