Jump to content

Watch of Today


mk3

Recommended Posts

On 2018-04-15 at 4:29 AM, anilv said:

Wearing a Fortis 'True-line' this Sunday. 

It's an automatic with an ETA 2452 inside. Bought it cheap a few years back as it was not running,  a service and it's running fine. It had a generic crown which I swapped out for a used original I had around.

Screenshot_2018-04-15-10-17-24-79.thumb.png.953e36d96d02a7a7d75824ccf16c7771.png

It has shrouded lugs which is a nice design feature and with the date at 1 o'clock it's quite a unique watch. 

Screenshot_2018-04-15-10-17-35-50.thumb.png.a705e152d8ff50afdc19108a29c08fde.png

Foetus is a brand rich in historynd their recent models are quite ice but is sad that they had to declare bankruptcy last year..  Hope they make it through. 

Anilv 

Reminds me a lot of this recent acquisition, something about the case shape and dial really works for me.
IMG_20180417_103405_1.thumb.jpg.fe134b13584715ae0745b217650eb880.jpg
 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow.. this Seiko is practically NOS. Can you share a picture of the caseback?

TIA

 

16 hours ago, Tipsy said:

Reminds me a lot of this recent acquisition, something about the case shape and dial really works for me.
IMG_20180417_103405_1.thumb.jpg.fe134b13584715ae0745b217650eb880.jpg
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, noirrac1j said:

Oh nice Sicura! Does this have the venerable gold standard of pin pallets--BFG 158 31/7?

J

Hi Joe ,  I don't know much about these watches so I opened the caseback to take a peek and I did see the number 158 under the balance wheel ,...so I guess it is as you described .

 

5ae0af97d09a3_ScreenShot2018-04-25at10_38_44AM.thumb.png.0fd819f9c8113d419f4fbfa5e7f7c313.png

 

 

5ae0afe09f663_ScreenShot2018-04-25at10_39_52AM.thumb.png.194405ea122306780982d3fb0b6a6c86.png

 

Edited by ricardopalamino
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, noirrac1j said:

Yes it does! Its a good, strong movement that is relatively straightforward to overhaul. Your example looks nice & clean. It will probably many years of service, but If you ever need spare parts, I have plenty.

J

Thanks Joe , Good to know you have my back on these parts .

The Best ,

Louis

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Tipsy,

Nice Skyliner! Your post made me dig out mine and give it some wrist time. its not as nice as yours though but in actual use the wear in the dial is not really an issue.

I haven't opened it up as its working fine. Serial number dates it form July '67 which makes it 51 years old!

IMG20180427142153.thumb.jpg.889fce3cb67f31df8f071df967d2d923.jpg

IMG20180427142207.thumb.jpg.ac77b150cd6d65cf8cd374a20a531539.jpg

 

On 4/25/2018 at 1:51 AM, Tipsy said:

Another Seiko from about the same time as the one above - Skyliner 6220 - 7970.

First watch I took apart, keeper that do not get that much wrist-time.

IMG_20180424_193302.thumb.jpg.a9d0870039b025955a3471c1424ae098.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, anilv said:

Hi Tipsy,

Nice Skyliner! Your post made me dig out mine and give it some wrist time. its not as nice as yours though but in actual use the wear in the dial is not really an issue.

I haven't opened it up as its working fine. Serial number dates it form July '67 which makes it 51 years old!

IMG20180427142153.thumb.jpg.889fce3cb67f31df8f071df967d2d923.jpg

IMG20180427142207.thumb.jpg.ac77b150cd6d65cf8cd374a20a531539.jpg

 

 

Nice, the serial number on mine is 7700053 and when I run it to check - it also was made in Jul 67. There are some true vintage gems right before the quartz crisis.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The plate is OK, thanks. It seems the answer to my question is that this is a 'hack' & for me another reminder that in general, one won't be the first person to be tinkering with an old timepiece!. As you day, I've been fortunate to have gotten some good advice and, just as important, encouragement. I've been lucky then not to have the balance spring break as a result of my novice 'ministrations' - but I did remember to 'stroke' rather than bend per se. The clock is of sentimental value to the owner so I'm relieved to have now got it running to time with the support & encourage of forum members like yourself.
    • Thanks ww, its maybe not as much of a bodge trick that i thought it was. 
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  It would be nice if you told us a little about yourself.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum. We all look forward to your contributions and continued involvement.  Can we help with what you are trying to  figure out? 
    • In think you are effectively shortening the coil by shorting out damaged tracks. In my case as long as the continuity was good and the resistance not too greatly affected it should be ok .  One was on an era  movement,
×
×
  • Create New...