Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

[SBGA405] Grand Seiko “Godzilla” Spring DriveI always enjoy coming back at the end of the week to my first Spring Drive watch which is a combined automatic mechanical watch and a high quality quartz — a Spring Drive.Impressive accuracy (10 seconds per month) and wears remarkably comfortable at 44.5 mm in diameter and 95 gm.Love the power reserve indicator, and the colour of the dial amd the watch band.One of my “perfect” watches!!😍

IMG_3752.jpeg

IMG_3754.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Kkramme said:

[SBGA405] Grand Seiko “Godzilla” Spring DriveI always enjoy coming back at the end of the week to my first Spring Drive watch which is a combined automatic mechanical watch and a high quality quartz — a Spring Drive.Impressive accuracy (10 seconds per month) and wears remarkably comfortable at 44.5 mm in diameter and 95 gm.Love the power reserve indicator, and the colour of the dial amd the watch band.One of my “perfect” watches!!😍

IMG_3752.jpeg

IMG_3754.jpeg

As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!

  • Thanks 1
Posted

1973 Bulova Diamond Excellency Q. 11 AN mov't manual wind. Love the UFO look of this one. Not sure the size of the diamond but looking around for an advertisement to see if it is.listed....strap is not original but the buckle is signed along with the crown. In excellent condition. DSCN58062.thumb.JPG.16baab92e8e3a524404d4eb322d56ecd.JPG20240505_1034502.thumb.jpg.7097f7e937b9716d52f7509af0036444.jpg20240505_1033142.thumb.jpg.d745abca252831451fac26ed4f6e947b.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Razz said:

1973 Bulova Diamond Excellency Q. 11 AN mov't manual wind. Love the UFO look of this one. Not sure the size of the diamond but looking around for an advertisement to see if it is.listed....strap is not original but the buckle is signed along with the crown. In excellent condition. DSCN58062.thumb.JPG.16baab92e8e3a524404d4eb322d56ecd.JPG20240505_1034502.thumb.jpg.7097f7e937b9716d52f7509af0036444.jpg20240505_1033142.thumb.jpg.d745abca252831451fac26ed4f6e947b.jpg

This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, GuyMontag said:

This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!

I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...DSCN58082.thumb.JPG.bf7094d36573d49e94eacbe03a709612.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 5/7/2024 at 9:20 PM, Razz said:

I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...DSCN58082.thumb.JPG.bf7094d36573d49e94eacbe03a709612.JPG

Updated photos with new leather strap and original signed buckle. I like the minimalist strap - plain back with black thread...DSCN58302.thumb.JPG.173930dcec85459cc271f2030c341775.JPGDSCN58312.thumb.JPG.0df257f1278db1b5ed61b0f519ce89a2.JPG

Edited by Razz
  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

CIMG0941.thumb.JPG.1d74c78265182ff68a1149d5c198a2f0.JPG

Today felt like a Timex day, so I've been sporting a classic.  One of my favourite vintage watches, a 1969 Timex Marlin.

Just for the record, as I recall this is a 404 club watch, and arrived pretty beaten up, and in need of a service. 

Its probably worth somewhat more than four quid after a little TLC.

The picture probably doesn't do it justice. Wearing it, the watch looks and feels almost new.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 5
Posted

The movement is positively agricultural, but you can't deny that for a 55 year old watch, its not looking half bad.

image.png.4e4913f41e1d5965d85f5d6ad6b315dc.png

Furthermore it is running pretty well for what it is. Often they are all over the place. This is what I am getting without a rewind, so the amplitude is starting to fade a little after a long day, but the accuracy and the beat error 'aint half bad for an ancient Timex pin lever.

They can be a bit of a faff to actually get running anywhere near as well as this sometimes, and a lot of them are somewhat tired and worn out, but this one is still marching on. I can't remember how long ago I serviced this one, but it was probably a couple of years ago, and I imagine the only time the mechanism had see the light of day before that was when it was in the factory in Dundee.

For what little it is worth, I'm sitting here writing some notes with a stainless steel Parker 45, which is another design classic.

I just looked up the date code on the pen (IIA if anybody is interested). At 32 years old, the pen by comparison is a relative youngster.

Posted
3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I have a love/hate relationship with Timex. Partly hate the crudeness of the movements but also admire that they keep on going, a bit like dollar watches. I can't fault the look. 

My dad (watchmaker running his own business) hater them. I have serviced a few. In a strange way, they are brilliant.

  • Like 2
Posted

I love Timexes. But there is absolutely no money to be made if we were to do a full disassembly, clean and oil.

But with the advent of the ultrasonic cleaner, I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound. It should be better than the dunk and swish method.

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Wearing a big lump of a watch today. Feels like i have a kettlebell on my wrist. Aw no and i promised no more bare leg shots 🤷‍♂️ , good god our lass needs her legs shaving and before anyone asks no she didn't lay the watch on top of my head and take a picture 😅

20240613_091411.jpg

20240613_094038.jpg

20240613_093947.jpg

20240613_095724.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted
On 5/31/2024 at 12:58 AM, HectorLooi said:

I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound.

I have done ultrasonic with naphtha and IPA and they cleaned well enough, but I worry too much about shaking the hairspring apart to keep doing it (for my own Timex watches, or for ebay sales, not professionally for clients). For a super dirty one, I doubt the pivot holes would get clean enough with the pivots in them though. Maybe with a better ultrasonic cleaning fluid.

Since I'm not under any time pressure, I keep disassembling them instead.

Posted (edited)

This is a quartz but one of my current favorites. Is 40mm and wears very nice. Was able to pick it up cheap and replaced the glass.20240614_2211162.thumb.jpg.95943c9a985d5a0f30d9d9ee008da77c.jpg20240613_0832082.thumb.jpg.97ce58898aa1eb3dd34ada1f7b1fc2df.jpg20240610_0644262.thumb.jpg.4d742680a522c1ec7a9283489352256d.jpg Could not read the time!

DSCN59093.thumb.JPG.7103c695c57a7b74bb17000a0902788d.JPG

20240610_0704052.thumb.jpg.c3fbb918549e61cb459d045b966222db.jpg

Edited by Razz
  • Like 4
Posted

Seiko Kinetic that I picked up at a local jewelry shop on a whim. I occasionally walk in to ask if they have any broken old watches, so I like to buy a few every now and then even if they're not my favorite.

After replacing the capacitor and cleaning the atrociously filthy case and bracelet, I have to say it's grown on me and I wear it a lot.

IMG_20240515_173830.thumb.jpg.72a4326498ceb23c4476dcaab4474866.jpg

IMG_20240515_173958.thumb.jpg.8c46ac4df9e0038fa1ebea9c74236de5.jpg

IMG_20240515_175006.thumb.jpg.8ba4705a699c7738c261f555c3f14dd2.jpg

IMG_20240618_185118.thumb.jpg.4a5c67c2a85159c4e9622fdd8a66c629.jpg

  • Like 5
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

CIMG1090.thumb.JPG.5c679ad195b021b2503ec024a97866b7.JPG

I picked this up recently for the 404 club, assuming it to be a Marlin from 1983, and probably a bit of a basket case, however it is actually a 1973 Mercury model number 160502473 and I have to admit I am very pleased with it.

It is remarkably clean, tidy and scratch free which is all the more remarkable given the fact that it is 51 years old (I did fumigate it anyway just because I always give everything that arrives a good clean before I start working on it).

It is probably one of the best preserved Timexes I have. Furthermore... it works, so I haven't even opened it up yet.

For a few pennies under four quid, well worth the gamble.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Seiko 11-0630 from July 1977 I think. White gold plated case and bracelet. Condition is amazing for 47 years old and running with great amplitude without even touching it. This one is for my wife. Nice charity shop find for just £4. I always look for watches in those shops but most of them seem to only sell modern quartz. You have to be really lucky to find something nice.

IMG_20240803_193601888_HDR.jpg

IMG_20240803_193708140~2.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

Very nice. I must confess to trawling round charity shops for bargains too. I was down in Milngavie the other day doing just this while my wife was visiting the dentist. Nothing but cheap quartz stuff on that occasion, but sometimes you do get lucky.

On 5/31/2024 at 6:58 AM, HectorLooi said:

I love Timexes. But there is absolutely no money to be made if we were to do a full disassembly, clean and oil.

But with the advent of the ultrasonic cleaner, I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound. It should be better than the dunk and swish method.

It might be advisable to at least take the hands off. The dial will probably survive, but I did manage to remove the paint from a set of hands in the ultrasonic a while back. Not sure why since they appear to be painted with battleship grade enamel paints, but once bitten as they say.


Taking the dial off is a little risky as the metal tabs tend to fail. Generally I do remove the dial and the hands, but not always. I also generally don't put Timexes in the ultrasonic, I just go for the slunge.  

  • Like 1
Posted

One of my favorites today: 1972 Seiko 6139B Bruce Lee. My first chronograph restoration, including reaming out the bushings to add jewels to the barrel. I'd love to find an original yellow dial and correct hands for it one day, but for now I just love wearing it.

IMG_20240803_172020.thumb.jpg.5ad914f83df1b3c097fd5fe4c7f9b712.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

CIMG1162.thumb.JPG.2c81ce9fff1b73ac3da9863e5cf4b04a.JPG

Timex indigo electroluminescent backlight watch with a unidirectional bezel (with a bright lume pip and a very satisfying click) and a nautical themed dial.

It is water resistant, apparently, but there is absolutely no indication whatsoever of exactly *how* water resistant, so I would assume "not very" would probably cover that.

CIMG1156.thumb.JPG.c925b667f8429eb8287880122ee71539.JPG

This was floating about in the junk box, as part of a job lot and seems to have appreciated a little TLC. It is  actually not a bad little watch. Perhaps not something I would wear very often, but in essence it was free, since I bought the lot for some other piece and since it is the only EL backlight watch I have, its actually quite a neat addition to the 404 club.

If anybody knows the significance of the pennant flag on the dial, I would love to know. 

Flag1.jpg

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for this post MikePilk, I just came across a similar problem with an Omega 1022.  The problem I had was the seconds pinion spring was bent out of shape and did not even engage with the wheel properly, so the seconds hand was not moving at all. (no power loss though :) I removed the automatic module so I could access the spring and work on it. Once I bent it back close to the right shape, I experienced the same problem you reported about power loss.  Many tweaks later, and the seconds hand is moving properly again, with amplitude back to good numbers again. Cheers
    • After cleaning up the pivots, I made bushes on the lathe. At this point I've pressed in 6 bushes (3 sets) and the wheels turn smooth. What I can also tell you, is that I'm not looking forward to final assembly. Getting the pivots aligned seems to get exponentially more difficult with each wheel that is added.
    • Islands are interesting places to live depending upon their size and other factors. This is a bigger island and it has a bridge to get there at least on one end. It's also big enough that you don't have to go someplace else to get things typically. It can be a problem if you get a job in Seattle though. Yes I've known of people who commuted from the island to Seattle for a job and I don't quite remember how many hours it took but it took a long time. So basically islands are nice if you don't have to leave very often.
    • Thanks @JohnR725! Everything you say makes a lot of sense and is encouraging to read.
    • isn't it nice to have a decent case open or when the case doesn't want to be opened? In the case of a Rolex watch that supposed to pass specific water resistant testing you probably do need to tighten the back down. But they shouldn't be tightened so much that they risk stripping the threads out. Then the other problem that comes up is the gaskets can start to disintegrate and then getting the back off can be quite a challenge unless you have a really good tool and perhaps some penetrating oil to loosen things up. Yes really nice case marking. When I was in school we were taught to mark the cases and  the American watch and clockmakers Institute even had a? So if you joined at one time they would give you an identification number. They were explaining or giving an example of if the watches ever found in you have a unique number they can perhaps figure out the history of the watch or identify the body it's attached to for instance not that that probably comes up that often. So you got a unique number and even made a special metal stamp that you can purchase. It wasn't a super big aggressive stamp but still it left a mark in the back of the case. Then I heard from people at work on Rolex watches they were using a felt pen indelible but later on they decided that was bad because apparently the ink could release  chemicals although it seems like once it's dry that shouldn't be an issue. Then of course today was nice is you can keep computer records sealed have to mark anything at all I personally find it's best to leave no reference behind that you were even there. Especially when you have a beautiful watch that has no markings at all and now it has your scribbling all over it not good typically if there is a typical and watch repair?  a lot of minor repairs you don't need to do a complete servicing. But beyond a certain point you're going to have to take apart a lot of stuff you're going to disrupt the lubrication even if it looks perfect right now and yes you might as well just go ahead the service the whole thing. also in a watch like this where a lot of things seem to be going on the complete service would be better then you'll know exactly where you stand versus dealing with unknown mysteries for prior repair.
×
×
  • Create New...