Jump to content

Antique vintage ROLEX help needed


NTK

Recommended Posts

Most brands mark their movement/calibre number on the main plate underneath the balance. Rolex also marked most of their calibres there until the introduction of the Rolex Calibre 1030.
Also worth noting Rolex have not always produced their own movements so this vintage movement might well have been produced by another manufacturer. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, clockboy said:

Most brands mark their movement/calibre number on the main plate underneath the balance. Rolex also marked most of their calibres there until the introduction of the Rolex Calibre 1030.
Also worth noting Rolex have not always produced their own movements so this vintage movement might well have been produced by another manufacturer. 

So I will need to remove the balance wheel to see the id number of the movement then. I think is original movement. Thanks. I will do that and take a look. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has a distinct whiff of Aegler 825 about it, but with a slightly different train bridge shape.

Aegler was a major supplier of movements to Rolex right up to 2004 when Rolex bought the company outright.

It would help if we could get a main plate diameter and a look at the keyless works but my money is on the Aegler.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

 I have some NOS parts to it, drop me a note in case you came to need spares.

I think I might need the crown and the stem and the small seconds hand to start. Haven’t opened yet to see what else. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marc said:

It has a distinct whiff of Aegler 825 about it, but with a slightly different train bridge shape.

Aegler was a major supplier of movements to Rolex right up to 2004 when Rolex bought the company outright.

It would help if we could get a main plate diameter and a look at the keyless works but my money is on the Aegler.

How much u think one of these fixed and services might go on the market ? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, clockboy said:

Also worth noting Rolex have not always produced their own movements so this vintage movement might well have been produced by another manufacturer. 

Here's the company that made Rolex movements up until 2004 one Rolex finally had 100% controlling interest in the company. So now it's a Rolex company although as Rolex solely acquired more and more the company I suspect towards the end they probably were making movements for anyone except Rolex

https://www.watch-wiki.net/doku.php?id=aegler

It's always nice to tell people that before 2000 for the Rolex movement was made under contract by somebody else.

1 hour ago, nickelsilver said:

it's super

A long time ago at a chapter meeting of the national Association of watch and clock collectors somebody was liquidating a estate before the days of eBay. Which worked out very nicely for me because I bought quite a few interesting watches all grossly underpriced. But one of my amusements was the fake Rolex? I asked why it was fake and was allowed to look at the movement couldn't see the movement because it was covered by the automatic mechanism of one jewel. Also when I asked why it was fake the one jewel thing was pointed out and the spelling of course the words were all wrong so he figured it was fake. So should I risk $25 on a fake Rolex and then I saw the balance wheel just like yours which is why I now have a really nice not fake I believe 635 movement.

It doesn't mention at the link when they switched over to the newer style or the interesting style balance wheels but yours is possibly in this series like the 600 Or at least it's really close to this as a guess

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&Rolex_600

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like a Rolex 700 not 600. Superbalance. The cushion case. dial sometimes called a ‘bow tie’…

IMG_0073.thumb.jpeg.a74e89911edc86d92406876abe5f3203.jpeg
 

I have one of these I’ve been trying to revive. It was going to satisfy my urge for a rolex. None of the three listed balance staffs for the movement fit the existing collet or roller- too narrow. I did read somewhere these were not so much produced with interchangeable parts. I will buy that theory…

I just bought another working movement to frankenwatch it if I can get the stem to fit…

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I realized I think I’ve serviced the cal 600 as well.

IMG_0150.thumb.jpeg.fa8e4917fb02ed056309633507c28604.jpeg

This is the wife’s watch. I bought it cheap and it took only a few hours of basic service. Some friends here helped out. 100 years old and still keeps great time on the wrist…

IMG_0151.thumb.jpeg.9738a946b15db932b4d5cfea28625174.jpeg

Edited by rehajm
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, rehajm said:

It looks like a Rolex 700 not 600. Superbalance. The cushion case. dial sometimes called a ‘bow tie’…

IMG_0073.thumb.jpeg.a74e89911edc86d92406876abe5f3203.jpeg
 

I have one of these I’ve been trying to revive. It was going to satisfy my urge for a rolex. None of the three listed balance staffs for the movement fit the existing collet or roller- too narrow. I did read somewhere these were not so much produced with interchangeable parts. I will buy that theory…

I just bought another working movement to frankenwatch it if I can get the stem to fit…

Which place you recommend to buy vintage parts online ?  Thanks ! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, rehajm said:

None of the three listed balance staffs for the movement fit the existing collet or roller- too narrow. I did read somewhere these were not so much produced with interchangeable parts. I will buy that theory…

I just bought another working movement to frankenwatch it if I can get the stem to fit…

The 700 series parts look interesting in that it appears to be there were lots of variations.Looks like they had both flat and over coil hairsprings which both of them at one time were available as separate hairsprings. Normally with the over coil because of premade they were available but it's shows on the parts list the flat hairspring was available. Then amusingly the old days where things were available like they hairspring collet comes in two separate sizes which would explain why your staffing has different sizes and even had the replacement Pin for the collet.

Here's what I have for the balance staff numbers then a little bit of specifications. But the problem with parts lists are this is what was in existence when the parts list was made if the watch was made after this widget probably was there were probably more variations.

image.png.9080e3f1fb11f2578affe407fcab6eac.png

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, NTK said:

Which place you recommend to buy vintage parts online ?  Thanks ! 

I didn’t have to look for much outside staffs which are readily available. Jules Borel has a few parts for the 600 and 700 but mostly screws and stems and such. eBay prolly has the most parts- some of the supply houses in EU might have what you need…

…and as always Borel and bestfit are good to search for compatible parts from different movements. There is much cross use with these calibers. Also the part labeled rollie might be much cheaper from a gruen movement…but as I warned I think these movements were quite hand fit so be aware with staffs and wheels and such…0

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...