Jump to content

Completed servicing Gruen 550ss last night and it was running within +10 seconds/day, this morning it is running CRAZY slow and the ticking sounds strange


Recommended Posts

Last night I had the movement running super smoothly within 10 seconds/day with decent amplitude (I don't remember exactly but I want to say 200) Today it was running insanely slow (400 seconds slow per day), the amplitude was around 120. I think it has something to do with the pallets because it is making an odd sound while ticking. One tick is much louder than the other.

The hairspring looks very straight and pivots on balance look good. I don't think it's an end shake issue from the balance because the odd tick if I give it more space.

Any ideas on what could cause this? I haven't messed with anything since last night so I'm not really sure what's going on or if it was just a fluke that it was running smoothly when I timed it last night.

PXL_20220421_193113963.jpg

PXL_20220421_193111457.jpg

16506427434117974313544888946406.jpg

16506427600086814160853271096724.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

200 degrees is the lower limit after 24 hours in a vertical position for vintage pieces by some Swiss makers. 200 horizontal at full wind is far from decent amplitude. Not much use looking at the timing discrepancy after a day of running until you get the amplitude up to a healthy level.

 

At 120 degrees of amplitude every little fault in the escapement gets amplified, no surprise if it sounds strange. Almost impossible to troubleshoot the amplitude problem without more information, but the timing difference could be something as simple as the regulator pins too open.

 

-how was it cleaned, how was it oiled?

- was there train freedom and recoil of the escape wheel after a couple of clicks of wind, dry movement, fork out?

-does the fork snap back and forth cleanly with a slight nudge with just a few click of wind?

-does the balance oscillate freely with the fork out? with the fork in, no power?

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As @nickelsilver says - "does the balance oscillate freely with the fork out?". But was is 'freely'?

One test I do straight after cleaning, is put the balance and cock on to the mainplate, then give the balance a good blast from a dust blower. For a balance like that, I want to see the balance still moving well after 30 seconds. If it's barely moving, or stopped, after 30 seconds, something's wrong.

You can also have a good look at the mainspring from the side, and check endshake.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

200 degrees is the lower limit after 24 hours in a vertical position for vintage pieces by some Swiss makers. 200 horizontal at full wind is far from decent amplitude. Not much use looking at the timing discrepancy after a day of running until you get the amplitude up to a healthy level.

 

At 120 degrees of amplitude every little fault in the escapement gets amplified, no surprise if it sounds strange. Almost impossible to troubleshoot the amplitude problem without more information, but the timing difference could be something as simple as the regulator pins too open.

 

-how was it cleaned, how was it oiled?

- was there train freedom and recoil of the escape wheel after a couple of clicks of wind, dry movement, fork out?

-does the fork snap back and forth cleanly with a slight nudge with just a few click of wind?

-does the balance oscillate freely with the fork out? with the fork in, no power?

Good questions! It was cleaned with zenith radiant and drizebrite using the three jar method from a l&r master.

Yes there is train freedom and very slight recoil from escape wheel.

Fork snapping back well after very little wind.

I tried to attach a video of balance after a puff of air with no fork but it won't let me for some reason. but it's moving very smoothly and for a long time with no power other than initial air puff

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Max50916 said:

Last night I had the movement running super smoothly within 10 seconds/day with decent amplitude (I don't remember exactly but I want to say 200)

Did you use a timing app or a timing machine for determining the rate?

3 hours ago, Max50916 said:

Good questions! It was cleaned with zenith radiant and drizebrite using the three jar method from a l&r master.

In addition to the cleaning did you change the mainspring?

A

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 Sound of ticking can change within ten hrs,  if escape teeth and pallets run unlubed. 

Is the oscilator in beat? 

 

 

Escape teeth and pallets were lubed.

Sorry could you elaborate on "oscillator in beat"? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Reference Joes answer. did you srip the balance spring off and re fit . If yiu did the collet may be on the loose side and has moved during the testing phase hence the off beat tick.

No I didn't mess with the hairspring or collet and was able to easily lube pivots fire to the incabloc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

Did you use a timing app or a timing machine for determining the rate?

In addition to the cleaning did you change the mainspring?

A

Yes I used a weishi 1000 timegrapher. No I kept the original mainspring, perhaps I should try a new one

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Max50916 said:

Escape teeth and pallets were lubed.

Sorry could you elaborate on "oscillator in beat"? 

Balance in beat, ie: Balance pivot, impulse jewel and escape pivot should fall on a line when the balance comes to a stop.    Zero beat error.     

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi This link explaiins what the beat error is, Basicaly the clockwise swing of the balance and the anti clockwise swing should be equal in a perfect world but shoule the swings become unequel by say 0.02ms we say theoreticaly its out of beat. There is a tolerance level and they should be as close to 0.00 as possible, because of mechanical diferences not always aceivable

https://r.search.yahoo.com/_ylt=AwrJO2Ucw2NiK3cAcxJ3Bwx.;_ylu=Y29sbwMEcG9zAzIEdnRpZAMEc2VjA3Nj/RV=2/RE=1650733981/RO=10/RU=https%3a%2f%2fwahawatches.com%2fwatch-talk-whats-the-beat-error-of-a-watch%2f/RK=2/RS=msWff1UEcXpApDmY2DCeM1vEINQ-

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
    • Hi everyone on my timegrapher it showing this do a make anymore adjustment someone let me know ?    
    • Maybe I'm over simplifying this and I'm a little late to the discussion, but just by my looking at oil when I use it on a treated cap jewel  the oil stays in one nice bubble, but when I don't it spreads out to the edges of the jewel. I'm not sure (but could well be wrong) but the analogy of a waxed car and rain is accurate in this case, the wax is very hydrophobic and repels the water, however, the process epilame works by is a different physical process based upon cohesion/adhesion (oleophilic) not repulsion (oleophobic)  at least as far as I have read/observed. If one were to use a oleophobic substance equivalent to wax (hydrophobic) then one would need to create a donut shape to fence in the oil, however if one used such a strategy with a epilame which is oleophilic then the oil would sit on the ring of the donut and not in the 'donut hole', exactly where you don't want it. Even if the oil is smeared then the oleophilic epilame should pull it back to the center (see diagram below). Reference For interest the chemical in epilame is 2-(PERFLUOROHEXYL) ETHYL METHACRYLATE, CAS NO: 2144-53-8
×
×
  • Create New...