Jump to content

Need help for Omega Seamaster caliber 562


Elton

Recommended Posts

Thanks Clockboy. It is automatic movement - watch has missing parts therefore looking for quartz replacement as an option. 

OmEGA details:

Dm= 27.9mm, Do= 28.4mm
H= 5.0mm
F= 1.75mm
T= 2.15mm
24 jewels
f = 19800 A/h
power reserve 50h

Balance staff U2769

Stem W2790

Hands
1.50 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Elton said:

Thanks Clockboy. It is automatic movement - watch has missing parts therefore looking for quartz replacement as an option. 

OmEGA details:

Dm= 27.9mm, Do= 28.4mm
H= 5.0mm
F= 1.75mm
T= 2.15mm
24 jewels
f = 19800 A/h
power reserve 50h

Balance staff U2769

Stem W2790

Hands
1.50 x 0.80 x 0.18mm

You will run into many issues, including fitting your dial, a need for some sort of mounting / fitting ring (usually plastic), adjusting your winding stem, etc, etc.

However, you can start searching here simply using your existing movement diameter and height:

https://www.cousinsuk.com/category/filter/watch-movement-search-match-by-millimeter-size

it does not have to be Quartz, you may find some mechanical movements suitable for your case.

Is it so bad that repairing your Omega movement is not an option?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Elton said:

I'm just wondering if I can find a quartz movement as suitable replacement. Quartz Movement number if available would be appreciated. Dial O/D is 27,5 mm. Thanks in advance.

Are you sure it can't be repaired ? There seems to be most parts available for this movement - check ebay and Cousins.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes you could probably put a quartz watch in  but  a lot of work is going to be required to find a suitable movement that lines up with the stem  and still has the hands in the right place for the dial.  Specifically the thickness of the movement has to agree with the thickness of  the original movement. Then more likely the hands will have to be replaced because usually  the quartz movement has different hand sizes in the regional watch.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, mikepilk said:

Are you sure it can't be repaired ? There seems to be most parts available for this movement - check ebay and Cousins.

Apart from a few missing parts, the main plate center jewel is damaged. The next option could be a spare Omega movement from eBay but it may cost between $ 180 - $ 200 AUD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Elton said:

Apart from a few missing parts, the main plate center jewel is damaged. The next option could be a spare Omega movement from eBay but it may cost between $ 180 - $ 200 AUD.

Are you aware that the center jewel could be replaced? The missing components depending upon what they are can be an issue. Sometimes it is cheaper to get a replacement movement. But did you know this is a discussion group of people who repair things maybe we can help you repair it?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't just give up the idea of repairing the 562. It is a really nice movement and will be worth the effort. Once it's back to life you can enjoy it for many years. 

But just as watchweasol said first list the parts you need to buy and check how much it would cost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good advice but challenging. I ruined the jewel hole as I tried to improvise and as a result I rimmed the hole too large. I'll persevere & still look for other option.  Apart from that more missing parts like cannon pinon ,winding stem ,& cog wheels all of those can be obtained from ebay (Omega spares). Biggest hurdle is the main plate which I ruined the center jewel hole as mentioned earlier. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as the hole for the jewel is still centered it shouldn’t be a problem to fit a new jewel with a larger outer diameter. But I would recommend you to let a professional watchmaker do it, these can easily crack and they need to be perfectly sized. But it doesn’t necessarily mean that the main plate is ruined

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, clockboy said:

Agree with “handwound”  this is a job only to be attempted with the correct tools. 

I would say with skills and experience more than anything else. You can see great work done by a master with mediocre tools, but never the other way around. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
×
×
  • Create New...