Jump to content

Demagnetizer Recommendations


Don

Recommended Posts

@Endeavor: -Yes, but your version takes a bit of "skill" to get to work! :)

The versions with coils work with distance attenuation - the field gets weaker as you move the part/movement away from the coil.

The automatic ones often use current attenuation, the field gets weaker around the part/movement  so the part can be still.

 

img_02.jpg

 

(picture from: https://www.j-ndk.co.jp/en/product/index_datsuji.html)

 

In my version a capacitor is charged (takes abt .3s) and is then then is used in a parallel LC-circuit that takes abt. 50ms for the field to go  from fully charged to zero. (depending on capacitor values, voltage and size of coil).

The biggest plus is that you do not need to lift/move the movement in the coil/field and the results are equal time and time again! :)

Edited by RCDesign
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you for the additional information :)

I now also understand again how the coil / capacitor circuitry works. Where I was initially a bit puzzled about was what kind of capacitor was used and therefor whether the AC was first converted to DC. Now knowing the L/C principle again, it may be wise to put up a schematic of your system with the details of the components. We don't want somebody to grab an electrolytic capacitor and "blows the place" or seriously harm himself....... The modern electrolytic capacitors do rupture, or have a relief-valve, but the old ones don't, and they take off like a rocket when connected to AC or hooked up wrongly to DC. (don't ask me how I know :biggrin:)

So if you have a simple schematic of your system with the components details, then at least that part is covered ;)

Thanks again!

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The other thing that is needed when playing with magnets and watches is a way of figuring out if your watch really is magnetized or not.

So there's the old-fashioned way with a compass image attached for how to do that. then a link to a free app for your phone from a company that wants to sell a really expensive demagnetizer.

https://www.lepsi.ch/watch-demagnetizer/

 

Check the magnetic field.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
On 5/19/2016 at 7:17 AM, oldhippy said:

Link doesn’t work. Could you get a pic?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 11 months later...

I have an old (1940?) demagnetizer. I’ve read about how some of these old ones are maybe too strong to put complete watches through, but never had an issue until yesterday: I put a complete cased watch in the hole, pushed the button and then slowly pulled it out, like I have 100’s of times. This time, the roller jewel actually got knocked out! When I took the back off the watch to see what happened I found it (luckily) on the ledge of the case! Looks like these strong demagnetizers can be too much sometimes?

I better buy a less aggressive one for complete watches. Anyone else ever see such a thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Woolshire said:

I better buy a less aggressive one for complete watches. Anyone else ever see such a thing?

No need to buy another one, just start a bit more far away from the object. However it's also true some demagnatizers are made for mechanical shop use not watchmaking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Woolshire said:

This time, the roller jewel actually got knocked out!

You didn't tell us what kind of a watch this is or how old it is? I think you'd find under normal circumstances it would take a heck of the impact to knock a roller jewel out. Very common on older watches that they become loose with time so anytime you're working on older watch your always supposed to check the roller jewel because quite a few times are on the verge of falling out anyway.

Watch companies are interesting for their recommendations. Omega is concerned of having too strong of a magnetic fields but then there are so looking at wristwatches. They don't have to deal with the things we deal with in the field that are often bigger than a wristwatch. Then there also looking for a tool that will tell you if the watches magnetized because compasses really aren't reliable.

I snipped out an image of unacceptable tools strangely enough they don't show ever using the Elma Antimag? Then another image of the important points kinda hinting at the magnetic field for removing magnetism has to somehow be really special and multi-directions. Which is interesting if you look at the instruction sheet for the Horotec Magtest What they show looks exactly like the same kind a magnetic field should get from the Elma Antimag .

https://www.witschi.com/en/products/teslascope-2/

http://horotec.ch/news/MSA19.910/102/lang/2

 

Omega unacceptable tools for magnetism.JPG

Omega important points magnetism.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...
On 1/29/2022 at 6:28 AM, JohnR725 said:

You didn't tell us what kind of a watch this is or how old it is? I think you'd find under normal circumstances it would take a heck of the impact to knock a roller jewel out. Very common on older watches that they become loose with time so anytime you're working on older watch your always supposed to check the roller jewel because quite a few times are on the verge of falling out anyway.

Watch companies are interesting for their recommendations. Omega is concerned of having too strong of a magnetic fields but then there are so looking at wristwatches. They don't have to deal with the things we deal with in the field that are often bigger than a wristwatch. Then there also looking for a tool that will tell you if the watches magnetized because compasses really aren't reliable.

I snipped out an image of unacceptable tools strangely enough they don't show ever using the Elma Antimag? Then another image of the important points kinda hinting at the magnetic field for removing magnetism has to somehow be really special and multi-directions. Which is interesting if you look at the instruction sheet for the Horotec Magtest What they show looks exactly like the same kind a magnetic field should get from the Elma Antimag .

https://www.witschi.com/en/products/teslascope-2/

http://horotec.ch/news/MSA19.910/102/lang/2

 

Omega unacceptable tools for magnetism.JPG

Omega important points magnetism.JPG

That’s interesting… Which demagnetizer does Omega recommend then?

I’ve read elsewhere that the Greiner is supposed to be strong enough to demagnetize a cased watch, but wouldn’t have thought it could be too strong…

In your opinion is Omega being overly cautious? Most demagnetizers don’t exactly quantify exactly how powerful they are, so we would have no way of knowing either…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ifibrin said:

Which demagnetizer does Omega recommend then?

If you look at the section you quoted there are two links those go to what they recommend. We do get in the image I snipped out hinting remarks of yes it could be too strong for and they don't specify this some watches. I've occasionally see on some wristwatches when they hairspring is jumping around wallets being demagnetized will have it looping part of it over the regulator pins in the F they go in fix that or just do it again that usually sometimes fixes itself. Then I don't know about the silicon hairsprings whether that is a possibility of damaging blows because I have a suspicion that silicon might be brittle even if it is a spring.

That of course there's the other little problem Omega's not dealing with really large watches like pocket watches.

Plus of course they have really deep pockets and they can recommend whatever they feel like because well I can. But I do like the idea of the solid-state detectors at these things have that tell you whether you have a magnetic field are not as I don't think the compass method is really reliable even though it's been around for very long time.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
On 5/7/2018 at 2:04 AM, JohnR725 said:

I was looking to get a demagnetizer so read all the posts in the demagnetizer section, i followed your link to the homemade demagnetizer using the microwave transformer, it seems to be the same type of circuit used in the elma demagnetizer, so thought i'd give the homemade one ago.

I already had a couple of old microwave transformers along with the other bits needed, diode, resistor, switches, i orderd a motor run start capacitor that came yesterday, i assembled it into a plastic biscuit box, it's a simple straight forward build, it works really well, i've never had a demagnetizer but seems better than the type you have to withdraw the watch away from slowly that i've seen discussed online.

I've ordered a new box to remount it into rather than a biscuit box to make it look a bit more professional, once it comes i will post some photos of the finished demagnetizer.

Thanks johnR725 for the link, that was a good find.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I got round to boxing the homemade demanetizer up last night, i moved it from the biscuit box, so now looks a bit more sturdy, it's easy and cheap to build and perfoms as well as the branded demagnetizer costing hundreds of pounds. I printed a crosshairs onto a self adhesive postal label to stick on the box a the centre of demagnetization area.

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

 

https://www.instructables.com/Demagnetizer-From-a-Microwave-Transformer/

 

 

 

 

demag.jpg

demagin.jpg

demagb.jpg

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, valleyguy said:

I got round to boxing the homemade demanetizer up last night, i moved it from the biscuit box, so now looks a bit more sturdy, it's easy and cheap to build and perfoms as well as the branded demagnetizer costing hundreds of pounds. I printed a crosshairs onto a self adhesive postal label to stick on the box a the centre of demagnetization area.

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

The microwave transformer looks like an overkill. Do you think a smaller, say a 25VA transformer, will work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Michael1962 said:

Do you need to have a demagnetiser for working on clocks?

typically are only worrying about balance wheels with their hair Springs. As hairsprings do not like to be around magnets or influenced by being magnetized. So yes some clocks would but only for the balance wheel assembly or the platform escapement

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, valleyguy said:

The only variation i made from the parts list was i used a 1N4007 diode instead of the 1N4004 listed as i have plenty of these, they are booth a 1 amp diode, i will change this diode to a 1N5408 diode as these are rated 3 amps.

Nice!

You should be ok with a 1N4007 diode. The 20 Ohm resistor would limit a lot of the inrush current into the capacitor, which is a pretty low value anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/30/2022 at 11:45 AM, HectorLooi said:

The microwave transformer looks like an overkill. Do you think a smaller, say a 25VA transformer, will work?

If you have one of these cheap "dumpsters" kicking around in your garage, they have a "midsize" transformer, see my DIY "Zapper" below ....

233291208_EinhellBatt-charger.jpg.e2f4d6266a699a4090dc4bafe3b691d6.jpg.2d887d5a4f34600f04032d217f96b136.jpg

On 6/30/2022 at 1:53 PM, gbyleveldt said:

You should be ok with a 1N4007 diode. The 20 Ohm resistor would limit a lot of the inrush current into the capacitor, which is a pretty low value anyway.

With regards to the inrush current, my first resistors blew / burned out after repetitive used within a short period of time. I ended up with with these 6Ω 50watt resistors, three of them in series and as it happened, with the diode in between. Also the diode and the momentary switch have to be of ample capacity. I can't see the diode number which I used, but it's a beefy one. The momentary push button has a 15Amp rating. I do admit that I got "slightly" carried away with the capacitor; 45 µF 😆

My "Zapper" zaps very well and doesn't overheat after repetitive use 😉

365634397_ScreenShot2022-07-04at07_24_21.png.bd82e8031b27c8cf47961a3d048a696a.png

IMG_1865.thumb.JPG.9491a60e941a439c224b097a2fd37128.JPG

IMG_1868.thumb.JPG.1dea0ff426ce2e69b6a56654c214ba06.JPG

 

Edited by Endeavor
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

With regards to the inrush current, my first resistors blew / burned out after repetitive used over a short period. I ended up with with these 6Ω 50watt resistors, three of them in series and as it happened, with the diode in between. Also the diode and the momentary switch have to be of ample capacity. I can't see the diode number which I used, but it's a beefy one. The momentary push button has a 15Amp rating. I do admit that I got "slightly" carried away with the capacitor; 45 µF 😆

Heh, 45uF is a looot of capacitor for that circuit and would have substantial amount of inrush. Just eyeballing the size of your transformer, I’d hazard a guess you’d get away with a cap 5 times smaller and still generate enough of a discharge into the transformer without saturating its core like is likely happening now. When you saturate the core, it doesn’t make a larger magnetic field, it just converts that energy to some heat.

Edited by gbyleveldt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...