Jump to content

Identifying clock


MechanicMike

Recommended Posts

Hi Michael  the name is derived from the fact that the almost friction free escapement and the slow rate coupled with a strong spring they would run for approx 400days  or also known as Anniversary clocks as they were wound once a year on their anniversary.  I have six of these and two quartz driven ones, They are interesting to work on but require patience as they are very touchy and must be level

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

They had to be re-named to anniversary clocks due to the trades description act because if the clock went for 401 or only 399 days it could not be called a 400 day clock,  when the horrid quartz came in well it all went out the window because they don’t need winding up at all.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, clockboy said:

Perhaps I have been lucky I was just not aware of that. I have not had that issue but have had issues where even after fitting the correct spring it has proved to be too strong and I have had to thin the spring. In my experience with the 400 day clocks everything has to be spot on or it stalls after a day or two. 

I bet this one will be one of those clocks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike the best type of level is the ones used for leveling caravans which levels in two directions , front/back and side to side , There apps for the iphone which also double as levels  and are accurate I use both  double checking the clock and the bench plate..

I got a couple of them. A bullseye and small torpedo level. Explain caravans?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, watchweasol said:

I find it a bit strange that the clock has no leveling feet, as I have six of these clocks all of which have screw adjustable feet. These clocks rely on being perfectly level to work and the feet give you that adjustment.  I have never had to alter the length of the springs either All from Horolovar.  I would check the underside of the base for the feet they may just be screwed right up into the base and not be apparent.

Hi Weasol- this one doesn't have, or didn't have any feet when I got it. Just the base, and then the two columns bolted to it. I'll post a pic when I get a chance tomorrow. Otherwise I'm going to level it and put power to ms and see if I can time and reg it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To be fair, you have picked one of the most difficult types of clocks to repair. In my time back in the 70's and 80's I new a few clockmakers who wouldn't touch the things. If you have been repairing clocks as long as I had it is quite common to have them in the workshop with no adjustable feet as I have explained above in one of my comments.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, oldhippy said:

To be fair, you have picked one of the most difficult types of clocks to repair. In my time back in the 70's and 80's I new a few clockmakers who wouldn't touch the things. If you have been repairing clocks as long as I had it is quite common to have them in the workshop with no adjustable feet as I have explained above in one of my comments.  

Yep I definitely read that. I remember when this arrived and with what little I knew I thought the feet were missing, until I got the book and began learning. I  was going to buy some only to find out these didn't have any. The weekend is almost here so I'll be getting after it after work. Sometimes, finding time is the problem. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike   yep  caravans in the UK  =   Trailers in the US,  The level is triangular in shape with two levels   I have anclosed a picture for you.

caravan level.jpg

That's kind of what I thought lol. But yes, I have levels almost like that, ready. Starting tonight I'll be leveling the carav... er I mean clock and I'll keep you posted unless you guys are getting bored with this one. I feel with y'alls help I'm soooo close! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mike   Its usually it is slightly out of beat or not quite level but believe me they take some setting up I have spent days at it..  I have a big Haller that I bought couple of days cleaning etc and a week and a half setting it up, some one had moved the pallet stones they were in plastic  friction mounts.  tried my patience

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi Mike   Its usually it is slightly out of beat or not quite level but believe me they take some setting up I have spent days at it..  I have a big Haller that I bought couple of days cleaning etc and a week and a half setting it up, some one had moved the pallet stones they were in plastic  friction mounts.  tried my patience

Holee ...well I'm not too upset about it...yet. we'll see what I can find when I get back.  And does the escapement move that sloooooow? Wow not even used to that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You poor blokes are in for the long haul of Mike trying to get this 400 day running! Ugh upon further inspection, the fork tines were definitely too tight around the anchor pin. It looks like they were bent on delivery. Just took a beater screwdriver and gave it a very slight tweak and presto- the escapement began to tic tock normally. I think that's where I was loosing everything. Right at the fork. Now, for the timing and regulation. Just by watching the pendulum swing it is out of beat and all but not terribly bad. I'm going to let it run awhile see where it lands. Oh and I also checked and re-leveled the "caravan" lol I love slight language differences ha? all others reading this or doing Anniversary clocks when someone mentions "has to be level" they are NOT kidding. At all.

So when I get this thing running, am I going to have to set this thing up again and level at the owner's house or what? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi guys.

@oldhippy might be the best to answer this but I presume others may know.

On the plans for the winder, there is a recess shown on one side of the clamp plates, Part H's. How deep should this be? As I have never seen a barrelled main spring on a clock, I don't know how deep to make this recess?

The other thing I have been thinking about is whether this winder can be used to let down a captured main spring that is held by a C clamp and not in a barrel?

Edited by Michael1962
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Mike  the distance between the forks is critical for operation too much and you loose travel too little and it binds, if you can slide a piece of paper between the fork and the impulse pin you are close and a smear of oil helps smooth delivery.

Regards the winder you can use it to release springs held in a "C" clamp using the appropriate holder to hold the loop but I find its best to wear a glove and control the release of the spring after the clamp is removed and conversly when rewinding to fit the clamp prior to fitting it in the movement.  Can you post a picture of the bit you mean regarding the "groove" , I copied the plans but cant remember where they are at the moment ( Old age)      cheers

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Michael1962 said:

Hi guys.

@oldhippy might be the best to answer this but I presume others may know.

On the plans for the winder, there is a recess shown on one side of the clamp plates, Part H's. How deep should this be? As I have never seen a barrelled main spring on a clock, I don't know how deep to make this recess?

The other thing I have been thinking about is whether this winder can be used to let down a captured main spring that is held by a C clamp and not in a barrel?

What is it you need help with? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
    • I think attaching a nut to the lid to pull it off is the least destructive, any damage damage on the outside is going to an easier fix than any created when trying to push it out from the inside. Scratching up the inside of the lid , mainspring or arbor bearing will be risk. Just my opinion.
    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
×
×
  • Create New...