Jump to content

Advice for oiling early balance staff.


Recommended Posts

Hello.

What would you guys advise the best way to oil this type of balance?

It's not exactly like a watch with end stones and seems to me, if I were to oil the underside of what resembles an endstone, the oil would just slide everywhere when I screw it back in.

Would A ) Oiling the stone attached to the balance plate be okay?

or B ) Using an automatic oiler after completing it all?

Thank you.

IMG_3582.jpg

save2.png

meh1.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

You oil it assembled. Put a little oil in the cup of the hole jewel, then feed it through, add until the circle on the cap jewel is big enough. An auto oiler should work as well.

Assembled with the balance wheel as well?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you have to disassemble to clean properly either option of oiling like a modern shock protected cap jewel and refitting carefully or oiling through the jewel hole as explained above, the best option in my opinion now I have and have used one is the auto oiler 1A, it's practically foolproof depositing the exact size little circle of oil which can be checked through the back of the jewel using a loupe before refitting the balance complete. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

You oil it assembled. Put a little oil in the cup of the hole jewel, then feed it through, add until the circle on the cap jewel is big enough.

Sorry, I don't understand this. With the cap jewel is assembled there is no access to the oil cup, which faces it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

The domed side of the hole jewel faces the cap jewel, the oil sink faces away.

I have a problem visualizing that. Maybe I don't understand the terms.

Isn't a "sink" same as a "cup" ? The pivot shoulder should rest on the other (flat) side.old oil.JPG

Below a so called domed jewel. What would be the point of the dome facing a cap jewel? The pivot should enter from the domed side.

cup-shaped-domed-olive-hole-jewel-500x50

I can't see what is hole jewel shape in OP picture. Cup? Sink? Domed?
For sure the hole jewel is set way down from the cap, I think that oil placed on the cap jewel, as suggested above, would not reach the pivot. And I'm not sure that oil feed from the other side would be visible through the cap jewel.

Untitled.png.0ef13fdbc72d02e1274aea34bac801cd.png

 

 

 


 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

            :sick:           If the movement was a non- runner, you wouldn,t know about the jewels,  until your tg crys something is wrong. 

Not to mention the service history and that the old piece may have been retired before your birthday and the reason for its retirement.

I soak the cock with the little screws for couple of days, to avoid broken screws starring at me, Remove the end stones, check all for my own self, better clean, instal balance wheel and cock without end stones to check the pivots inside the jewels and get and idea of the end-shake so to adjust the jewel if needed. 

I try to get the job finished with one reassembly.

Yes Sir, that's how I go about it. 

Best

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

44 minutes ago, jdm said:

I have a problem visualizing that. Maybe I don't understand the terms.

Isn't a "sink" same as a "cup" ? The pivot shoulder should rest on the other (flat) side.old oil.JPG

Below a so called domed jewel. What would be the point of the dome facing a cap jewel? The pivot should enter from the domed side.

cup-shaped-domed-olive-hole-jewel-500x50

I can't see what is hole jewel shape in OP picture. Cup? Sink? Domed?
For sure the hole jewel is set way down from the cap, I think that oil placed on the cap jewel, as suggested above, would not reach the pivot. And I'm not sure that oil feed from the other side would be visible through the cap jewel.

Untitled.png.0ef13fdbc72d02e1274aea34bac801cd.png

 

 

 


 

 

Those diagrams are of non-capped jewels, which are not to be used for balance wheel pivots. Here is a diagram of what we are talking about:

960px-Watch_jewel_bearing_and_capstone.sThe dome is there to keep the oil in the center with capillary action when brought to contact with end stone. There should not be any shoulders on balance pivots, but a gradual slope. Only surfaces acting as bearing surfaces are around the tip of the pivots. Otherwise there would be too much friction.

Edited by CaptCalvin
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CaptCalvin said:

Those diagrams are of non-capped jewels, which are not to be used for balance wheel pivots. Look up diagrams of capped jewels.

Found one on this website. Now I understand, Thanks.

st1.JPG

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Nucejoe said:

I try to get the job finished with one reassembly.

Good but that can't be done with the OP watch, because the chaton screws heads face the balance, so you have to remove cock and hairspring to access them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jdm said:

Good but that can't be done with the OP watch, because the chaton screws heads face the balance, so you have to remove cock and hairspring to access them

OP shows end cap removed, his question had already been answered.

   This is an opportunity to give tips, which I did on risk reduction, " SOAK" 

Spell corrector has changed the word birth to birthday.

Best 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OP:  The regulator arm will eventually come off the end stone housing as you clean the end stone.  Once you have re-assembled the end stone to the cock, CAREFULLY snap the regulator arm back onto the end stone housing.  Every vintage Elgin movement I work on has then cock/end stone/regulator arrangement.


Good Luck,

 

RMD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rduckwor said:

  Every vintage Elgin movement I work on has then cock/end stone/regulator arrangement.

 

I just did an Elgin 683 (with considerable difficulty I might ad).  Does this magical aforementioned 1A oiler fit those jewels?  Tiniest pivots and jewel holes I have yet to encounter!

I managed to oil the end stone and fit the regulator and cock down onto it.  It runs good but probably could run better from what I read in this post.  I placed a dot of oil on the back side jewel and placed the end cover onto that.  Think I got it half right at least!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, nichod said:

I just did an Elgin 683 (with considerable difficulty I might ad).  Does this magical aforementioned 1A oiler fit those jewels?  Tiniest pivots and jewel holes I have yet to encounter!

I managed to oil the end stone and fit the regulator and cock down onto it.  It runs good but probably could run better from what I read in this post.  I placed a dot of oil on the back side jewel and placed the end cover onto that.  Think I got it half right at least!

The 1A oiler needle is the finest tip available and 'should' pass through the smallest pivot hole, most infuriatingly I snapped mine so cannot measure it to tell you until I can order a replacement but it has been used on a few ladies wristwatch calibres and worked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

“Early”?! It looks like a Longines 12.68 or similar. Not that early!

You always have to remove the cap jewel and clean it to a mirror finish. Personally, I oil the cap jewel separately and reassemble while making sure I don’t let the oil smear sideways. A very small amount on the jewel hole helps the oil for form a bond. I do also occasionally oil via the jewel hole when assembled, but I find this less predictable. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is not rare at all, the dial code and case code don't usually match.
    • Good question!! Anyone know of a substitute movement??!! 🤔🙏
    • Interesting issue that I just noticed: this Seiko 5actus Watch from 1977 has a calibre listing on the dial of 7019-8030R but on the case back it says 7019-8010!! Like a mis-printed coin, is this watch therefore worth a lot of money for its rarity?? 🤪😲🤔🤪
    • I wish that was the case. The Aegler movements used in the early days by Wilsdorf & Davis (for brands like Rolex and Rolco) came in several sizes and without designated calibre numbers that survive.  They become a bit easier to identify during the 1920s. Below is an Aegler-Rebberg, 25.74mm in diameter. It’s from a woman’s Rolex wristwatch. Stamped Rebberg and 500 on the dial plate (but it isn’t a Rebberg 500, it’s the wrong size).  I’d be interested if anyone can identify the movement.  It is based off the Aegler Nr.1, circa 1903, but they based many many calibres of different sizes on it. The closest I have to a positive ID is the  ‘Rolex Nr.50’ circa 1917, but no dial side images or movement sizes are available in the references. There are identical looking movements in many sizes.  The 25.74mm of this movement is a particularly strange size for the era, it equates to 11.41 lignes.      Best Regards, Mark
    • It looks like this movement comes with a number of different shock settings. Emmywatch shows that it comes in versions with no shock settings, 'Incabloc', 'shock resist', and 'Supershock'. Perhaps the different settings position the impulse jewel/roller table in a non-ideal position relative to the pallet fork/guard pin. Are you able to check under high magnification if the pallet fork and roller table are able to operate without any interference? Just for fun I took a look and I have one FHF 70 in my collection, a West End Secundus with a non-shock protected FHF70. I had a note with the watch that said, "Movement is stamped 'FHF 70', but the FHF70 looks to have sub-seconds instead of center seconds movement (??)" but that a google search turned up both types for this movement. EDIT: I just took a look in my parts drawer and I have a few of these movements, both in center seconds and sweep seconds, but they all are non-shock protected.  
×
×
  • Create New...