Jump to content

Any experience with this kind of case?


avion

Recommended Posts

I've worked on these cases..

The movement fits into a caseback and the crystal is fitted on the caseback. Then the whole assembly is press fitted into the upper case.

First check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem (in case my memory is faulty!). Then press on the crystal while supporting the lugs. If you're using your thumbs be aware that it can 'let go' suddenly.

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@ Ishima - no it's definitely not a screw type

@anilv - I'm not sure what you mean by "check if the upper case does NOT go around the stem". I'd be surprise if the method of pressing the crystal should be applied here since it's stated on the baseback " Benrus #2155 - Remove with blade"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

If the back doesn’t come off, then it comes out from the front. It will have a two-piece stem. You pull the stem, lift off the glass and the movement can be taken out.

thanks. So something like in:

 

from minute 1:05

I need to use the blade after to take the bezel out ?

If so, I shall check if the stem is indeed a two-piece stem and let you know :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, anilv said:

The reason I remember these cases is that replacements crystals are not easy to source and I usually had to modify something to fit.

Good luck.

Anilv

I'm glad to know that it's not just me. I've been going nuts trying to find a crystal to fit what looks to be a ladies Sea-Hawk, possibly aka, "Mermaid", for this type case. What makes it difficult for me is that the, at least arguably, most important dimension is the ID of the crystal, not the OD, as is the usual case. I've tried a couple of different sizes, without the step, and I'm getting close, but still don't have the dial covered yet. :-(  I don't remember it being as difficult with my men's Sea Hawk. But this ladies version is a tough one.

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like. I have the tool, but still no crystal. Good luck.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MrRoundel said:

As far as the OP's watch, I don't know if it does need the Benrus press, but the company did make a special tool for their waterproof cases.  And yes, the watch back does say to use a "watch blade", so I have my doubts, as the Benrus tool is a screw-fed press, i.e. very un-blade-like.

The press is to close the case, but to open it you go around the case back seam with a sharp blade. A normal "case knife" won't work. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2018 at 3:39 PM, vinn3 said:

first verify that you have a "two part" stem.  or take the crystal out with the "claw tool"  as illustrated above.  vin

After giving it a few shots I'm quite positive that this is not a two parts stem :/

Any other suggestions? Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, oldhippy said:

Some two-piece stems are sods to pull out. I used my nippers, pull the button out to set hands and with nippers behind give one hell of a tug.

 

I used nippers and strong leverage. If it's a two parts, then it must be glued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After looking at the original image of the back of the watch, and the fact that the "Benrus" is slightly askew, I'm pretty convinced that this is a conventional "back-loader". It would be unforgivable of Benrus to have a crooked logo on the back of a one-piece front-loader, no? Of course, I  don't know that there weren't some sort of two-piece front-loaders made. If that's the case, I'm back to not-quite-square one.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...