Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

[SBGA405] Grand Seiko “Godzilla” Spring DriveI always enjoy coming back at the end of the week to my first Spring Drive watch which is a combined automatic mechanical watch and a high quality quartz — a Spring Drive.Impressive accuracy (10 seconds per month) and wears remarkably comfortable at 44.5 mm in diameter and 95 gm.Love the power reserve indicator, and the colour of the dial amd the watch band.One of my “perfect” watches!!😍

IMG_3752.jpeg

IMG_3754.jpeg

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
10 hours ago, Kkramme said:

[SBGA405] Grand Seiko “Godzilla” Spring DriveI always enjoy coming back at the end of the week to my first Spring Drive watch which is a combined automatic mechanical watch and a high quality quartz — a Spring Drive.Impressive accuracy (10 seconds per month) and wears remarkably comfortable at 44.5 mm in diameter and 95 gm.Love the power reserve indicator, and the colour of the dial amd the watch band.One of my “perfect” watches!!😍

IMG_3752.jpeg

IMG_3754.jpeg

As  I kid, I'd watch Godzilla stomping over buildings and cars and I'd think to myself: Tokyo is a really dangerous place to live... . Cool watch!!

  • Thanks 1
Posted

1973 Bulova Diamond Excellency Q. 11 AN mov't manual wind. Love the UFO look of this one. Not sure the size of the diamond but looking around for an advertisement to see if it is.listed....strap is not original but the buckle is signed along with the crown. In excellent condition. DSCN58062.thumb.JPG.16baab92e8e3a524404d4eb322d56ecd.JPG20240505_1034502.thumb.jpg.7097f7e937b9716d52f7509af0036444.jpg20240505_1033142.thumb.jpg.d745abca252831451fac26ed4f6e947b.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)
20 minutes ago, Razz said:

1973 Bulova Diamond Excellency Q. 11 AN mov't manual wind. Love the UFO look of this one. Not sure the size of the diamond but looking around for an advertisement to see if it is.listed....strap is not original but the buckle is signed along with the crown. In excellent condition. DSCN58062.thumb.JPG.16baab92e8e3a524404d4eb322d56ecd.JPG20240505_1034502.thumb.jpg.7097f7e937b9716d52f7509af0036444.jpg20240505_1033142.thumb.jpg.d745abca252831451fac26ed4f6e947b.jpg

This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!

Edited by GuyMontag
  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, GuyMontag said:

This is such an odd Bulova. Off of the top of my head the only other mechanical Bulova that I can think of that has the 'Bulova' logo as an hour marker is the Golden Clipper 'J' (there must be others), one of my favorite dials. And then it has a solitary diamond, which is not unusual with Bulova, but paired with the 'Bulova' hour marker, that only leaves two quarter hour markers, and I can't think of another Bulova that has only two hour markers like that. You do you Bulova, no conformity here!

I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...DSCN58082.thumb.JPG.bf7094d36573d49e94eacbe03a709612.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
On 5/7/2024 at 9:20 PM, Razz said:

I agree, very minimalist dial,  but then the diamond. The 1973 R has a black dial and gold case and is similar in layout. But on the MyBulova site there really is nothing else like it...DSCN58082.thumb.JPG.bf7094d36573d49e94eacbe03a709612.JPG

Updated photos with new leather strap and original signed buckle. I like the minimalist strap - plain back with black thread...DSCN58302.thumb.JPG.173930dcec85459cc271f2030c341775.JPGDSCN58312.thumb.JPG.0df257f1278db1b5ed61b0f519ce89a2.JPG

Edited by Razz
  • Like 3
  • 3 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

CIMG0941.thumb.JPG.1d74c78265182ff68a1149d5c198a2f0.JPG

Today felt like a Timex day, so I've been sporting a classic.  One of my favourite vintage watches, a 1969 Timex Marlin.

Just for the record, as I recall this is a 404 club watch, and arrived pretty beaten up, and in need of a service. 

Its probably worth somewhat more than four quid after a little TLC.

The picture probably doesn't do it justice. Wearing it, the watch looks and feels almost new.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 5
Posted

The movement is positively agricultural, but you can't deny that for a 55 year old watch, its not looking half bad.

image.png.4e4913f41e1d5965d85f5d6ad6b315dc.png

Furthermore it is running pretty well for what it is. Often they are all over the place. This is what I am getting without a rewind, so the amplitude is starting to fade a little after a long day, but the accuracy and the beat error 'aint half bad for an ancient Timex pin lever.

They can be a bit of a faff to actually get running anywhere near as well as this sometimes, and a lot of them are somewhat tired and worn out, but this one is still marching on. I can't remember how long ago I serviced this one, but it was probably a couple of years ago, and I imagine the only time the mechanism had see the light of day before that was when it was in the factory in Dundee.

For what little it is worth, I'm sitting here writing some notes with a stainless steel Parker 45, which is another design classic.

I just looked up the date code on the pen (IIA if anybody is interested). At 32 years old, the pen by comparison is a relative youngster.

Posted
3 hours ago, RichardHarris123 said:

I have a love/hate relationship with Timex. Partly hate the crudeness of the movements but also admire that they keep on going, a bit like dollar watches. I can't fault the look. 

My dad (watchmaker running his own business) hater them. I have serviced a few. In a strange way, they are brilliant.

  • Like 2
Posted

I love Timexes. But there is absolutely no money to be made if we were to do a full disassembly, clean and oil.

But with the advent of the ultrasonic cleaner, I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound. It should be better than the dunk and swish method.

  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Wearing a big lump of a watch today. Feels like i have a kettlebell on my wrist. Aw no and i promised no more bare leg shots 🤷‍♂️ , good god our lass needs her legs shaving and before anyone asks no she didn't lay the watch on top of my head and take a picture 😅

20240613_091411.jpg

20240613_094038.jpg

20240613_093947.jpg

20240613_095724.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted
On 5/31/2024 at 12:58 AM, HectorLooi said:

I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound.

I have done ultrasonic with naphtha and IPA and they cleaned well enough, but I worry too much about shaking the hairspring apart to keep doing it (for my own Timex watches, or for ebay sales, not professionally for clients). For a super dirty one, I doubt the pivot holes would get clean enough with the pivots in them though. Maybe with a better ultrasonic cleaning fluid.

Since I'm not under any time pressure, I keep disassembling them instead.

Posted (edited)

This is a quartz but one of my current favorites. Is 40mm and wears very nice. Was able to pick it up cheap and replaced the glass.20240614_2211162.thumb.jpg.95943c9a985d5a0f30d9d9ee008da77c.jpg20240613_0832082.thumb.jpg.97ce58898aa1eb3dd34ada1f7b1fc2df.jpg20240610_0644262.thumb.jpg.4d742680a522c1ec7a9283489352256d.jpg Could not read the time!

DSCN59093.thumb.JPG.7103c695c57a7b74bb17000a0902788d.JPG

20240610_0704052.thumb.jpg.c3fbb918549e61cb459d045b966222db.jpg

Edited by Razz
  • Like 4
Posted

Seiko Kinetic that I picked up at a local jewelry shop on a whim. I occasionally walk in to ask if they have any broken old watches, so I like to buy a few every now and then even if they're not my favorite.

After replacing the capacitor and cleaning the atrociously filthy case and bracelet, I have to say it's grown on me and I wear it a lot.

IMG_20240515_173830.thumb.jpg.72a4326498ceb23c4476dcaab4474866.jpg

IMG_20240515_173958.thumb.jpg.8c46ac4df9e0038fa1ebea9c74236de5.jpg

IMG_20240515_175006.thumb.jpg.8ba4705a699c7738c261f555c3f14dd2.jpg

IMG_20240618_185118.thumb.jpg.4a5c67c2a85159c4e9622fdd8a66c629.jpg

  • Like 5
  • 1 month later...
Posted (edited)

CIMG1090.thumb.JPG.5c679ad195b021b2503ec024a97866b7.JPG

I picked this up recently for the 404 club, assuming it to be a Marlin from 1983, and probably a bit of a basket case, however it is actually a 1973 Mercury model number 160502473 and I have to admit I am very pleased with it.

It is remarkably clean, tidy and scratch free which is all the more remarkable given the fact that it is 51 years old (I did fumigate it anyway just because I always give everything that arrives a good clean before I start working on it).

It is probably one of the best preserved Timexes I have. Furthermore... it works, so I haven't even opened it up yet.

For a few pennies under four quid, well worth the gamble.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Seiko 11-0630 from July 1977 I think. White gold plated case and bracelet. Condition is amazing for 47 years old and running with great amplitude without even touching it. This one is for my wife. Nice charity shop find for just £4. I always look for watches in those shops but most of them seem to only sell modern quartz. You have to be really lucky to find something nice.

IMG_20240803_193601888_HDR.jpg

IMG_20240803_193708140~2.jpg

  • Like 4
Posted

Very nice. I must confess to trawling round charity shops for bargains too. I was down in Milngavie the other day doing just this while my wife was visiting the dentist. Nothing but cheap quartz stuff on that occasion, but sometimes you do get lucky.

On 5/31/2024 at 6:58 AM, HectorLooi said:

I love Timexes. But there is absolutely no money to be made if we were to do a full disassembly, clean and oil.

But with the advent of the ultrasonic cleaner, I wonder if we can get away with just dunking the fully assembled movement, sans the dial and hands, into the ultrasound. It should be better than the dunk and swish method.

It might be advisable to at least take the hands off. The dial will probably survive, but I did manage to remove the paint from a set of hands in the ultrasonic a while back. Not sure why since they appear to be painted with battleship grade enamel paints, but once bitten as they say.


Taking the dial off is a little risky as the metal tabs tend to fail. Generally I do remove the dial and the hands, but not always. I also generally don't put Timexes in the ultrasonic, I just go for the slunge.  

  • Like 1
Posted

One of my favorites today: 1972 Seiko 6139B Bruce Lee. My first chronograph restoration, including reaming out the bushings to add jewels to the barrel. I'd love to find an original yellow dial and correct hands for it one day, but for now I just love wearing it.

IMG_20240803_172020.thumb.jpg.5ad914f83df1b3c097fd5fe4c7f9b712.jpg

  • Like 5
Posted (edited)

CIMG1162.thumb.JPG.2c81ce9fff1b73ac3da9863e5cf4b04a.JPG

Timex indigo electroluminescent backlight watch with a unidirectional bezel (with a bright lume pip and a very satisfying click) and a nautical themed dial.

It is water resistant, apparently, but there is absolutely no indication whatsoever of exactly *how* water resistant, so I would assume "not very" would probably cover that.

CIMG1156.thumb.JPG.c925b667f8429eb8287880122ee71539.JPG

This was floating about in the junk box, as part of a job lot and seems to have appreciated a little TLC. It is  actually not a bad little watch. Perhaps not something I would wear very often, but in essence it was free, since I bought the lot for some other piece and since it is the only EL backlight watch I have, its actually quite a neat addition to the 404 club.

If anybody knows the significance of the pennant flag on the dial, I would love to know. 

Flag1.jpg

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If he was much younger and some sort of sports player it wouldn't be a problem. They would be in there and doing surgery and he'd be back on the field in no time. Unfortunately when you get older little things are bad and big things can be really bad so not good at all.
    • Where I work everything incoming watches whatever detailed descriptions are taken entered into a computer program and photograph of each item. Then ideally although it depends on who's doing the paperwork detailed descriptions can be quite good other times there lacking. Like I really like it with pocket watches if they would record the serial number it avoids confusion later on. Then when watch repairs are completed that is also entered in. It's one of the amusements I learned when I was in school instructor had a shop and commented about the important aspect of keeping detailed records of repairs. Because oftentimes a customer who got a new crystal will come back later on when the watch doesn't work and expect you to fix the entire watch for free. Then you can remind them that they just got a crystal. Strangely enough that keeps coming up or occasionally comes up where I work now. One of the problems of using the service marks on the case is that in the case of pocket watches oftentimes that's not the original case. Then case marks? What I was doing warranty work for a company I used to describe a code number in the back of the case and it would tell me the next time I see the watch that basically what I did I made no attempt at keeping track of customers because we had literally thousands of them I think they sold 30,000 of these watches and they would come back by the hundreds because they had a lifetime warranty. Yes that's a story all of itself but I would put a code number that would reference what was done to the watch the last time and think I had a date in there somehow so it did tell a story if you knew the code. Another shop I once worked out the number would reference the page in the book. So other than knowing we had been in there you would have no idea what happened because you have to go look at the page in the book to see what happened. Then the problem of how you examine a watch you should examine the watch in detail every single time to avoid complications. Although on vintage watches and this is a of amusement I have at work when people ask something and I say of the watches done when it leaves. This is because on vintage oftentimes problems won't show up until the watches much farther into the repair like it's now running and you discover things that you can't discover before because it wasn't running to discover them that also become sometimes difficult to have exact rigid prices are estimates of repairs or in the case of a pocket watch you may not find out if a casing problem to later on when you case it up in the watches running. I was just thinking for all those people that would like to leave a mark maybe you should learn to do what some of the past watchmakers did? Leave a mark but leave it in such a way that no one will ever find it? Typically not done for repair purposes but done for other reasons like identifying it's legit. I have a friend with a Gruen watch and one of the Roman numbers the bottom line that just looks like a line under extreme magnification actually says Gruen watch company or something equivalent. So here's a link showing how to mark your watch without being seen although that's not the actual title. So if you can learn micro engraving you can engrave the watch someplace probably just about any place you just have to remember where you put it. https://cnaluxury.channelnewsasia.com/obsessions/how-to-prove-if-watches-are-authentic-secret-signatures-182516  
    • I have acquired a Citizen Leopard 36000 watch. My reason for purchasing it was my desire to own a timepiece with a 36,000 BPH movement, and the price was reasonable. Another motivating factor was gaining hands-on experience with the mechanism. The watch is in good condition, but I intend to fully disassemble it for maintenance. First and foremost, if anyone has prior experience with this particular model, I would greatly appreciate their insights. I do not have access to Citizen’s specialized lubricants and will need to use the ones available to me, such as 9010, 8000, and 8300 grease. Additionally, I do not possess the appropriate oil for the pallet jewels and will only be able to clean them.
    • Hello all, I am working on an older Valjoux Chrono. It doesn't have a stamp on the movement anywhere but I believe it is a Valjoux 72. I installed the train of wheels and they will not turn. The problem appears to be the 4th wheel and the escape wheel are not interfacing correctly. I had to replace both of these parts as the pivots were broken on each. I sourced genuine Valjoux/ETA replacements. I think the problem is with the escape wheel as all the wheels turn perfectly if I remove just the escape wheel.  My question to those with more Valjoux experience is am I mistaken? Is this some other model altogether and I have the wrong part or parts?    
    • I would remove the wheels, check for damage and if not damaged, clean. 
×
×
  • Create New...