Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Today I thought I'd pop over to good old ebay and have a look to see what was about in antique clocks. They never disappoint me because I can find rubbish which sellers try to palm of on people. 

This is todays find and what salesmanship it comes with. Tell me what you think is wrong and if you are right you win a peanut.:D

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Beautiful-Antique-French-Surpintine-Mahogany-Inlaid-8-Day-Mantel-Carriage-Clock-/191905214083?hash=item2cae712e83:g:xmUAAOSwGIRXbVWx

Posted

Hi OldHippy,

I know sweet Fanny Adams about clocks (or watches come to that) but, aside from the movement being cockeyed in the case, I'd say that the hands were wrong (too long) for a start.

Posted
12 minutes ago, sstakoff said:

I know nothing of clocks either but I would think it would be signed in French, not English. Close???

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nope sorry.

Posted

An inspection of the hour hand shows that the filigree bits aren't punched through in a couple or three places.

Is that it?

Gryf

Posted

My guess is the platform escapement is a Swiss lever and far too modern for a antique clock so the sellers claim that the clock is all original is untrue ( a blatant lie actually ).

  • Like 1
Posted

Actually his listing states the case is all original not the movement my mistake I don't want to do the seller of this polished t$%d an injustice:biggrin:.

Posted
8 hours ago, wls1971 said:

My guess is the platform escapement is a Swiss lever and far too modern for a antique clock so the sellers claim that the clock is all original is untrue ( a blatant lie actually ).

You are correct.:Bravo: There is more.

Posted

Nice quizz! :)   I didn't even know there was such a thing as a mantel carriage clock. I thought this looked like a conversion from pendulum to carrriage (the mantel case can support a pendulum I guess), but there's no hole for a pendulum to pass through in the case cylinder. Is that carriage original?

How is this thing wound btw? With the big square arbor on the back?

Posted

The clock seems to have German style dial much the same found on 400 day clocks. The hands are just plain wrong & is it really mahogany. 

  • Like 1
Posted

I have just emailed the seller with this. I'll let you know what his reply is, I bet there not pleased.:D

 

Why haven't you mentioned that the platform escapement is a replacement there for the clock isn't an antique as you have stated. You need to change this description immediately it's a false description and I'll instruct ebay if it's not changed A S A P.

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, anilv said:

Ebay is only good if you know what you're buying.

Anil

Agree. Someone will think this clock is wonderful when in fact they are buying a load of rubbish.

Posted (edited)

I don't think for one minute this is a French movement.

Hands are not fitted the way I would expect with a nice hand collet and pin. It looks like a modern nut.

Platform escapement looks modern and not very good the colour is also two modern.

What gives it away is the back plate. Oil sinks very shallow almost none existent. The righting is inconsistent and that arrow for the hands is so wrong it's not nice and its far too big. The screws are modern and incompatible.   

Is it from ebay?

Edited by oldhippy
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, oldhippy said:

Is it from ebay?

Thank You for the informations!

No, its just a guys clock on another forum asking for the value. O dont know much about clock so i promised for him to ask a professional clockmaker ;)

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, szbalogh said:

Thank You for the informations!

No, its just a guys clock on another forum asking for the value. O dont know much about clock so i promised for him to ask a professional clockmaker ;)

It also looks poor quality brass going by the back plate.  

  • Like 1
Posted

The answer to my original post.

It's what is called a marriage, a clock movement is put into another case very popular with Longcase clocks, many of you know these clocks as grandfather clocks.  

The case is fine looking and it has the correct description.

The movement comes from a different case and is what is called a drum fitting movement.

What gives it away is as clockboy said the dial and hands, if you look carefully the fitting of the hands is incorrect they should be held with a collet and pin, not a nut, the centre wheel has been altered to fit the dial, hands are bad they are modern they are not fine which you would expect if original.  The platform is a complete replacement and is nothing like what the original would have been.

Thanks for the input and it made it fun and games so everyone who took part you each win a peanut.:D

  • Like 1
  • 2 months later...
Posted

That's not rubbish. Its a 30 hour Longcase clock dated about 1790 no later then 1800. There's a lot of work involved in putting it in good working order. Pity it doesn't have its original case. Its what as known as a cottage longcase. The painting of a cottage on the dial has nothing to do with the clock name. Very basic sometimes crude movements would be called such a name. More then likely the case would be made of oak and very plain.

  • Like 1
Posted

i just bought a "Shatz type"   ships clock.    its smaller and made of much heaver brass. it sounds like the same mvt..  the only writing is "made in germany"  and an insignia of what looks like wings (both on the dial).  i will be opening it for service and see any other writing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you see at least one thread protruding, or even a half, then you may have a chance using this "tool", but don't squeeze hard. Lot's of patience, and if you notice any signs of loctite or other adhesives, then apply several drops of acetone on top of broken stem. Use heat (hairdrier) also. You should be able gradually turn it counterclockwise, just like i did on this broken Timex stem, which was glued with something like nail hardener. Then you can use an extender to save your broken stem. https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/513DVvkfW5L.__AC_SX300_SY300_QL70_ML2_.jpg   You can also try cutting a small grove / slot on top of the broken stem to use 0.7mm flat screwdriver.   Depending on the Crown material and Stem material, you can try dissolving the stem. 
    • How long had it been without any wind before you first put it on the timegrapher?  Perhaps there was some debris / old lubricant that loosened up while you were waiting to do the 24 hour reading? I recently serviced a Seiko 6319 that immediately after service was absolutely horrible on the timegrapher - 24 hours later (without me doing anything) it was rock solid!  I was a little surprised by this (as I have seen improvements in amplitude after letting it run in but never a watch going from useless to great!). I was suspicious that some dirt must still be in there so I took it apart and cleaned and lubcricated it again and had exactly the same experience - snow storm that after some hours turned into a nice straigh line with good amplitude 🤷‍♂️
    • Yes, I know it was able to run before just enough that everything supposed to be affixed with shellac could fall out. I won't get back to work on this watch for several days at least, but one thing you mentioned about the banking pin adjustments being intended for fork horn clearance got me wondering.... The last adjustment I made to the entry stone yesterday did not solve the problem when the balance is installed. The escape teeth can't quite clear the stone when the balance swings. But I thought it was going to work because manually snapping the fork back and forth did allow the escape wheel to advance almost all the time. I wonder if there's another issue with the impulse jewel, that I have to shellac again anyway. I am going to measure the fork slot and the jewel because I am curious if it is the right size or possibly narrower than it should be. My thinking is if the horn clearance is too great maybe it is not getting enough impulse to clear the escape tooth. But pushing the fork with a tool can move it far enough to clear the escape wheel tooth.  I'll see later in the week. I didn't expect a big challenge from this watch because it ticked for 5 minutes before stopping without shellac. As always I was way wrong.
    • I had one success (and one failure) dissolving a broken stem out of a crown with Alum. The successes was a stainless steel crown and a milder steel stem. A Tag Heuer 2000 Automatic - here with the solution at around 60ºC I could see small bubbles coming up from the stump of the stem and it took maybe 6 hours to disolve I tried to repeat this with another watch and it did nothing.....  This was A Bulova Ambassador with what again looked like a stainless steel crown.  
    • That good to know in one way.
×
×
  • Create New...