Jump to content

3 jaw chuck


Stevelp

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone, I hope you are all safe and well!  I recently got my hand on a small Boley 8mm lathe as I would like to try to broaden my skill set.  I’m looking into getting a 3 jaw chick for it but what I’m finding all seem to be fairly expensive, like in the 300-400 USD range for used.  I’m just wondering if anyone out there would have a suggestion of a brand or maybe has hands on experience with something that is more affordable?  I won’t be using it a whole lot therefore something more affordable would be great.  

83136644-82DF-4333-B135-4748758BC248.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They are so expensive because they are very useful and not enough of them were made. That said, I’d be loath to pay more than £150 for one. Have a look for ones made by Burnerd - they were often included in Pultra sets and will work with Boley threads. Another option for a cheap range of larger chucks is to get an ER chuck with an 8mm fitting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, vinn3 said:

a 4 jaw chuck would be a better investment.

This might sound like a dumb question, but what is the practical difference, other than there being an additional jaw?

A other much cheaper part which I would recommend is a jacob’s chuck. I have fantastic ones by Bergeon and Jacob’s USA and they are so quick and easy for drilling. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, vinn3 said:

CHUCKS;  jacob's  with 1/2 " x 20  thread US  will fit on some  unimat lathes.    a 3 jaw  chuck ( like a jacob's)) is suposed to be "dead center" and fast,     the  4 jaw chuck,   you set it to dead center or  off center for special jobs.  very veritile !  better choice at twice the price.   vin

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/21/2020 at 3:40 PM, rodabod said:

This might sound like a dumb question, but what is the practical difference, other than there being an additional jaw?

A 3-jaw chuck is self-centring. All 3 jaws tighten in unison, so you are at the mercy of the build quality or wear in terms of how centred your workpiece will be. On a 4-jaw chuck, the jaws adjust independently. It takes longer to set up, but by using an accurate measuring instrument e.g. a dial gauge, you can centre exactly. You can also hold non-round workpieces, or set up purposely off-centre.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

All 3 jaws tighten in unison, so you are at the mercy of the build quality or wear in terms of how centred your workpiece will be.

Not just the build quality, but the intrinsic limits of geometry and tolerances. Since the driving element a spiral groove that is common to all jaws, which must also work reversed, some design compromise must be taken so keep it acceptably smooth.
For example, on my Unimat 3 copy I have less than 0.01mm runout at the spindle chuck spindle register, but about 0.12mm with a precision 7mm round bar in the 3 jaws - which is the same as the Ebay example above.
There are ways to improve concentricity on  self-centering chucks, but in the end if precisions is needed either use collets, independant jaws, or turn between centers. There can be more ways also, as machining is full of ingenious methods.
All that being said, here we are talking about hobbyist / non-precisions chucks only. I'm sure that watchmaker's and and professional machines chucks have a different precision class. 

1 hour ago, Klassiker said:

On a 4-jaw chuck, the jaws adjust independently.

Not all 4 jaws chucks are of the independant type, and not all sellers do specify. Look for square sockets on the body in line with the center of all jaws. Below an self-centering 4 jaws chuck, again for the Unimat 3. These are mostly used for woodwork where high precision is not important, but you need to grab square section parts often. SAN-OU-Lathe-Chuck-50Mm-Mini-4-Jaw-Rever

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m not sure that I could be bothered with setting up a 4-jaw every time I wanted to do something simple like mounting a drill bit. My 3-jaw chuck is not for extremely accurate work. I’d like to measure it though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, rodabod said:

I’m not sure that I could be bothered with setting up a 4-jaw every time I wanted to do something simple like mounting a drill bit. 

Nobody said that you have to use independent jaws all the time. Each machining tool has a purpose, and similar tools can overlap with another for certain tasks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed. But I don’t think a 4-jaw is something I happen to need for my watchmaking lathe. Vinn says “4 jaw is best” but not for my needs. I’m not drilling main plate holes or anything like that.... I can’t think when I would have benefited from one. 
 

That said, I have used a 4-jaw a few times when making some tools on the larger clockmakers lathe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, rodabod said:

Agreed. But I don’t think a 4-jaw is something I happen to need for my watchmaking lathe.

The issue with this topic is that it was started about watchmaker's lathing, then quickly migrated to general (hobby) machining. Similar but different  subjects, it's good to know a it of both.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps it did migrate, but someone initially stated that 4-jaws would be better, without referencing hobby machining.

I think there is a reason why self-centring 3-jaw chucks are the usual choice for watchmaking. I rarely do any eccentric turning, but I do have a faceplate which I can use.

Back to the original post: I can recommend getting a Burnerd or similar quality 3-jaw (German, Swiss, English, American). The Sherline chuck which jdrichard describes sounds promising too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, rodabod said:

Perhaps it did migrate, but someone initially stated that 4-jaws would be better, without referencing hobby machining.

Right. But we know well that our long time member vinn3 here is more familiar with machining that watchmaking :-) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wow, thanks everyone, there's a whole lot of awesome information happening here!  This went a whole lot deeper that I thought it would.  I think a 3 jaw is still the most fitting for what I'm looking to do.  jdrichard, great video!  What you have there is exactly what I would be looking for and after looking into it those pieces are way more affordable than what I have been finding on ebay. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to try my hand at doing some different types of case finishes (circular brushing, radial lines of sunburst finishes etc.), and I,ve seen these finishes done on small lathes with the 3 jaw and the results looked quite good.   Would the extra steps in setting up the 4 jaw be evident in the results that I would get?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, jdm said:

Right. But we know well that our long time member vinn3 here is more familiar with machining that watchmaking :-) 

     if you are new to running a lathe,  use a 3 jaw,  jacobs' and collets.  most nubies are afrade of a  4 jaw because it takes much more time to  get it "on center".  with some experience,  a 4 jaw can be put on center in15 seconds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...