Jump to content

ETA dirty escapements


CaptCalvin

Recommended Posts

Why is that every escapement on brand new ETA movements that I see all look like this? Doesn't look right does it? Doesn't read bad at all on the timing machine though: clean lines, 310 amplitude and everything. So what's up with this? Is this just how 9415 looks like after some run-in?

20190926_042847[1].jpg

 

20190926_044155[1].jpg

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No it doesn't look right. I guess only the person responsible at ETA factory may know what is that and why it happened.
But if you suspect it's lubricant all you have to do is to re-apply and check again after 24-48 hrs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

imageproxy.php?img=&key=8c41f123521b3122More images of the pallets. Also the escape wheel is covered in droplets of oil. Nobody else have ever had these observations on their ETA's? I still consider myself new to watchmaking but this seems to go against all the examples of good watchmaking I'd seen. All the ETA's I've ever seen in the 2 years I've been in this hobby, all brand new, looked like this...

20190926_052130.jpg

20190926_052150.jpg

20190926_052257.jpg

Edited by CaptCalvin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Swiss use something called Lubrifar to lubricate their escapement's.  It is a mixture of oil and Molybdenum disulfide. If you look on Pages 13 and 14 of the attached Omega document you'll see the reference to it.  As the Molybdenum disulfide is black in color that's what is your probably seeing.

Omega__8645_WI_40_rules for lubrication-2.pdf

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

The Swiss use something called Lubrifar to lubricate their escapement's.  It is a mixture of oil and Molybdenum disulfide. If you look on Pages 13 and 14 of the attached Omega document you'll see the reference to it.  As the Molybdenum disulfide is black in color that's what is your probably seeing.

Omega__8645_WI_40_rules for lubrication-2.pdf 1.28 MB · 0 downloads

AndyHull adds trying a spot of Molyslip on the jewels to his very unwise 0W30 in the Timex etc. 404 watch lubrication experiments. In other news, Swiss watch shops start selling AndyHull voodoo pin cushions. 
 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, JohnR725 said:

The Swiss use something called Lubrifar to lubricate their escapement's. 

But that's an ETA, and they recommend 9415, so they should manufacture with what they recommend ?!? And any deviation from stringent quality standards is unacceptable, no matter where the factory is located. BTW I'm not aware of ETA assembling mechanical outside Switzerland.

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

i finally found a way to make a payment, I think, and need some escape lube to hear some tic toc. So if I get no 300 degrees I can always blame it on you.:D

Lubrifar?  Mkebius941 ?

I think the consensus is that 9415 is best. I have used it three or four times so far and got excellent results. The small bottle is so big that will last not one by 100 lifetimes, if anyone wants to have some just le me know.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nucejoe said:

Would you gentleman decide which one.:pulling-hair-out:

Lubrifar?  Mkebius941 ?

Don't blame us for not being able to make a decision blame the Swiss. It's all their fault over time continuously changing which lubrication's and not explaining why were supposed to change. Then the various manufacturers that have had their own private lubrication's that were never going to get.

Then don't worry about the Lubrifar It's been around for very long time and a very long time ago we could got a kit to apply it I'm sure it was astronomically expensive and it's been long since discontinued so other than coming on a factory escape wheel we can't use it.

Then I've attached Moebius's Current lubrication chart.

Then we have the other little problem of time? The problem with the tech sheets are they range over quite a time span and lubrication has changed over that time span. So like the general lubrication guide shows 9010 used to be the choice for escapement lubrication. Replaced by 941 specifically for that. Then 9415 came out originally for higher frequency watches as it stays in place better. Then you get an either or and now it seems to be just 9415 for almost everything. 

Then I think a lot of this has changed as we get modern timing machines we can see the effect of bad lubrication especially over time. We get the factories servicing their watches now recognizing that maybe the original lubrication rules just didn't cut it.   I think this is why you see the quantity of lubrication applied like the pivots has increased considerably because the old rules lubrication just didn't last over time.

 

 

tableEN.pdf tinf_9415_en.pdf tinf_941_en.pdf

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JohnR725 said:

Don't blame us for not being able to make a decision blame the Swiss. It's all their fault over time continuously changing which lubrication's and not explaining why were supposed to change. Then the various manufacturers that have had their own private lubrication's that were never going to get.

Then don't worry about the Lubrifar It's been around for very long time and a very long time ago we could got a kit to apply it I'm sure it was astronomically expensive and it's been long since discontinued so other than coming on a factory escape wheel we can't use it.

Then I've attached Moebius's Current lubrication chart.

Then we have the other little problem of time? The problem with the tech sheets are they range over quite a time span and lubrication has changed over that time span. So like the general lubrication guide shows 9010 used to be the choice for escapement lubrication. Replaced by 941 specifically for that. Then 9415 came out originally for higher frequency watches as it stays in place better. Then you get an either or and now it seems to be just 9415 for almost everything. 

Then I think a lot of this has changed as we get modern timing machines we can see the effect of bad lubrication especially over time. We get the factories servicing their watches now recognizing that maybe the original lubrication rules just didn't cut it.   I think this is why you see the quantity of lubrication applied like the pivots has increased considerably because the old rules lubrication just didn't last over time.

 

 

tableEN.pdf 351.41 kB · 0 downloads tinf_9415_en.pdf 305.82 kB · 0 downloads tinf_941_en.pdf 297 kB · 0 downloads

I see the effect by ear, darn thing wont run unless I lubricate escape teeth, you want to see it on video? And not just one movement. Pin pallet ofcourse. 

Thank for sending the links.  Best wishes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, watchweasol said:

Hi  are these watches made and assembled in switzerland or are they swiss parts assembled in Asia as many are to reduce labour costs that may answer the question.

 

All my examples are from Bulova(Accuswiss), Tissot, Victorinox, and Mido.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, jdm said:

But that's an ETA, and they recommend 9415, so they should manufacture with what they recommend ?!? And any deviation from stringent quality standards is unacceptable, no matter where the factory is located. BTW I'm not aware of ETA assembling mechanical outside Switzerland.

From what I can tell Lubrifar Can be found on Rolex, Omega and ETA plus probably other companies. Then what they manufacture with and what they recommend is not always the same thing. They have access to stuff that we don't have yes it seems simple manufacture and service with the same stuff but that isn't always the case.

So no matter what you have to lubricate the escapement and the current recommendation until something better comes along is 9415. Just don't use too much especially on modern watches you lose amplitude but that doesn't mean you necessarily have to go as extreme about this as Omega does in their technical documents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If this is moly grease, then it tends to coat metal parts with an almost permanent coating of molybdenum disulfide on metal parts and in this case, also on ceramic parts (the jewels) we have to assume.

Molybdenum disulfide is similar to graphite, both in colour and low friction properties, but molybdenum disulfide is better for certain applications. The grease may also contain some form of oil to keep it in suspension, and it may be this oil that is being liberated and then sputtering on the metal sides of the gear. Possibly the strange dispersion pattern you are seeing is due to the application of an oleophobic coating on those metal surfaces.

In other words, what we are seeing may be normal, for this application, however since watch manufacturers guard their secret sauce recipes very tightly, and thus, I can't find any online information to support these assumptions,  my observations are only speculation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have limited experience with MolyS2 in a different area.  I shoot precision rifle and some competitors use moly coated bullets for a variety of reasons.  I can tell you that once moly is used on a metal part that sees any pressure or significant compression (i.e. the inside of a rifle barrel), the moly is there pretty much forever.  These guys (not me fortunately) scrub and scrub their barrels and the moly stays behind.  it's a one-way-street for them.

 

I would suspect that the escape wheel teeth on watches lubricated with any moly greases or oils have a thin coating of moly in the metallic surfaces where the escape jewels contact the teeth both on lock and the slip phases of the escape movement.   Good or bad I cannot say.  I seriously doubt that there is any penetration into synthetic jewels, but I have no data to prove or disprove that aspect.  MolyS2 is dirty and get all over everything near it.  Like copier toner.

 

RMD

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we use the rub-off epilame method of pallet stones (run dry for a few minutes before applying the epilame) where will the oil go/be transported when it is pushed away from the impulse surface by the escape wheel teeth? Onto the epilame-treated sections of the pallet! Once the oil has been applied/transported to the epilame-treated sections of the pallet where will it then go? Nowhere as the oil will remain on the epilame. So, perhaps the run-dry method defeats its intended purpose leaving the pallet impulse surfaces dry!? If, on the other hand, we do not remove the epilame from the pallet stones where the escape wheel teeth come in contact with them I'd expect more oil to remain where we want it and need it.
    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. 
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
×
×
  • Create New...