Jump to content

Is this mainspring ok?


omx5o

Recommended Posts

Hi,

I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?

thanks.

image.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi,
I’m in the process of servicing an Oreba movement. After the disassemble and inspection, this is how I found the mainspring. It’s not S-shaped in any way and is not flat as you can see in the image. Is this mainspring tired and in need of replacement or should it be fine after a clean?
thanks.

I’d replace it with a modern alloy spring. It’s old and the fact that it’s not lying flat would be enough for me to replace. It’s also likely that performance will be affected.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is a mainspring that is "set" and would now allow for a long duration of powering the movement nor the movement's amplitude specification.  Not being flat is most likely due to the movement being installed by hand - not a mainspring winder.

Definitely replace.

George

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all, that's a definitive replace then. I suppose the next question is how interchangeable are pocket watch mainsprings. Do I need to source the exact type for that caliber, or is it possible to use something more generic? The movement/watch is an Oreba and the main plate and bridges all have "84" stamped on them. The case has "3714" stamped on it. The barrel is 15mm diameter and the spring is about 1.5mm in height.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Someone probably have an old pocket watch mainspring book.  I have checked but only had for watches. Could be tricky to find the exact spring. as new springs are much better then the old one where. show us a picture of the movement. If you have one. 

Found some Oreba movement on google. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&b0&2ustu&1386777618

https://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/OREBA-HALF-HUNTER-SWISS-LEVER-15J-MOVEMENT-SPARES-OR-REPAIRS-N27-/382293150576

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is the problem I have every time I can’t find an exact match for a mainspring, you will need length height and thickness of the mainspring and then look for one that is nigh on the same, I cheekily ask here as some like old hippy to name but one will off the top of their head give you a size of a spring that will fit, it might be shorter but thicker etc etc but their experience is priceless, as of yet I still haven’t figured out how far off the exact measurements I can go to find a mainspring that would work. It’s wizardry you know!!!!!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, rodabod said:

A white spring of the same dimensions won’t have the same strength as a blue one, so this should be taken into account. 

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, transporter said:

SO does that mean that you will need a longer spring to compensate for the lack of strength or a thicker spring? ( I’m thinking thicker an I correct? ) and if so how much thicker or longer??

I understand that a coiled spring can be modeled as a series of small cantilever beams. The strength of such a beam is dependent on the moment of inertia = width*thickness³/12                     (that's thickness cubed)

i.e the strength of the spring is FAR more dependent on the thickness than the width.

So try to get the thickness as close as possible

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, omx5o said:

Thanks, that's interesting math behind it. I now have the spring dimensions, 1.9 x 0.25 x 520 x 15.8 mm. My M.Cutmore book states that the unwound spring should occupy radius/3 of the barrel, so that's something else to keep in mind.

Cousins have a 1.9 x 0.23 x 500 x 16.5 Non-Automatic ( GR56991 ). That looks pretty close?

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

Looks good but the diameter is too big to push straight in to the barrel. You will have to unwind it and re-wind it in to the barrel.

I measured the internal distance of the barrel. Is that correct? If I measure the external diameter (excluding the teeth) then it's 16.9mm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just an update. I received the new mainspring from Cousins today. Checked it against the barrel and as expected it was a fraction too big to just drop in. So I carefully unwound it by hand and used a winder to get it into the barrel. This is where it got a little interesting as I had problems the first time I used this winder because I used the wrong size so I selected what I thought should be correct size for this one. However, when winding I discovered that with about an inch of spring to go it suddenly jammed and I realized that the winder barrel was full and stopped the spring being completely housed. Fortunately I worked around the problem by continuing to insert the winder into the watch barrel as normal and then manually feeding in the inch of remaining spring into the gap around the edge of the barrel. I tried pressing the winder button but it was too stiff since the spring was jammed in, but fortunately with a little tap of a hammer the spring popped into place. So far so good.

Then I noticed that the spring's inside coil was just a little too big for the arbor which meant it just freely rotated without catching. So I carefully used pliers to shrink the size of the inner coil. The arbor then slotted firmly into place and after returning the barrel lid, it was winding successfully.

After that, I re-assembled and oiled the watch by closely following Mark's course videos. The movement is now happily ticking away with an amplitude of 274 and a nice steady beat. I think the balance might need realignment as there's a large gap between the dots on the timegrapher, but so far I'm pretty chuffed with it all.

Thanks for the help.

Peter

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...