Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hey 

I have now opened the cleaner and have some pics. As i say it was working, the basket when turned on and spinning was very fast, to fast and would not adjust via the button.

Can any one tell me from the pics what the problem may be and any other advice would be welcome.

Im not sure what parts i can remove etc.

cheers

gary

 

 

 

 

 

 

IMG_20211026_205147.jpg

IMG_20211026_205158.jpg

IMG_20211026_205202.jpg

IMG_20211026_205206.jpg

IMG_20211026_205209.jpg

IMG_20211026_205213.jpg

IMG_20211026_205221.jpg

IMG_20211026_205227.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, gary17 said:

but if you look at my pics i have 2 extra black wires?

If you can't understand immediately a circuit, you need to draw a diagram, with all elements and their connections.

That is the speaking language of electronics, without it people can't understand which wire are you talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Today my "new" Brenray arrived.

All seems well... heater works, motor spins all jars and lids are there.

The speed control is a bit erratic, especially in the lower RPM, but that is more then likely the wire-wound potentiometer (some will call it a rheostat) 

which may be a bit 'sparked in' as that will be the rpm it has been most used on.

Contact cleaner and some p2000 sanding paper should solve that issue .

May as well rewire the lot when I have its innards on the bench.... a bit of heat resistant wire never hurt anything...

Does any of you know if the lids of these jars are supposed to have cork gaskets (and the same for the closing plate underneath the motor) ?

There is no gasket to be seen on the machine, but those are easily made

 

Cheers

Paddy

 

PS, I have no idea how the picture of my inspection microscope ended up here, but I bought that one to make pictures, rather then fussing around with a camera or a phone

image.png

Edited by Paddy1302
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LittleWatchShop said:

Show some pictures you have taken with this, please.

 

Could you please also measure the max diameter you can fit into the picture? Can you for example take a picture of a whole pocket watch? I understand that a microscope is not made for this, but if it can then its a good bonus. My camera mounted on my amscope can only take pics just half of the averaged sized mens wristwatches.

Edited by luiazazrambo
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, luiazazrambo said:

Could you please also measure the max diameter you can fit into the picture? Can you for example take a picture of a whole pocket watch? I understand that a microscope is not made for this, but if it can then its a good bonus. My camera mounted on my amscope can only take pics just half of the averaged sized mens wristwatches.

I will be happy to do so, as soon as I got the SD card I need to put in it ! It's barely out of the box...so I haven't really played with it yet ... I have an optical one for work, but due to lag (which is actually quite ok with this one) digital microscopes aren't really suitable for working with.

Since I am a rank amateur, my thinking was to shove a movement underneath this thing, take a pic after removing a part...so I stand a chance putting it back in the right place !

 

Paddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2021 at 10:32 PM, clockboy said:

I am no electronics guy but this post from 2015 was about the brenray and one issue was no control of speed. Well worth a read. 
 

 

Thanks for that, I did have a read... and contrary to our Brother who posted this, I am an EE, so somewhere I have a piece of paper that says that "I know what I am doing" (yeah, my wife doesn't believe me either...)

These wire-wound potentiometers often get sparked-in around the place where they are set the most... it is more than likely a mechanical issue of an electric component.

After a lifetime of use, the track (which is basically a part of the circular coil that has its insulation sanded away) and the runners (the copper parts that slide against that track) are often gunked-up with all manner of unmentionable grime and DNA.

Often a very liberal application of a good brand of contact cleaner (and I mean really spray until it is soaking wet) does the trick. If there is a bit of pitting on the track itself... smoothing that out with some very fine sanding paper can get these things as good as new. The runners too can benefit from an abrasive clean with P2000 or finer.

 

But once I have the thing apart, I shall post my findings and antics to remedy this (for now) minor issue

 

paddy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, luiazazrambo said:

My camera mounted on my amscope can only take pics just half of the averaged sized mens wristwatches

Here's what I get on an amscope stereo microscope with an eyepiece adapter for a phone.  With a 0.5x and 0.3x barlow.  Nice thing about the phone is no messing about with SD cards.  Pictures show up in google photos as they are taken.

 

PXL_20220121_200933370.jpg

PXL_20220121_201247668.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Mark unpinned this topic
  • Mark pinned, unpinned and featured this topic
  • 4 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, I am about 5 months into watchmaking and I love it!   The attention to precise detail is what really attracts me to it. (and the tools!) I am working on a 16 jewel 43mm pocket watch movement.   There are no markings besides a serial number (122248) .  The balance staff needs replacement. The roller side pivot broke off.  I successfully removed the hairspring using Bergeon 5430's.  I successfully removed the roller using Bergeon 2810.   Did i mention I love the tools?! I removed the staff from the balance wheel using a vintage K&D staff removal tool  with my Bergeon 15285 (that's the one that comes with a micrometer adjustment so it can be used as a jewel press as well as a traditional staking tool...it's sooooo cool...sorry..  can you tell i love the tools?) No more digressing..  I measured the damaged staff in all the relevant areas but I have to estimate on some because one of the pivots is missing. A = Full length  A= 4.80mm  (that's without the one pivot...if you assume that the missing pivot is the same length as the other pivot (I'm sure it's not)  then A = 5.12 mm...(can I assume 5.00mm here?) F=  Hair spring collet seat  F=  .89mm   (safe to assume .90 here? .. I am sure that my measurement's would at least contain  .01 mm error ?) G = balance wheel seat  G = 1.23 mm  (1.20mm?) H  =  roller staff  H =  .59mm  (.60 mm?) B  = bottom of the wheel to roller pivot   B  = 2.97mm  (3.00 mm?)     here I am estimating  again because this pivot is missing. So my friends, and I thank you profusely,  can you point me in the right direction as to how to proceed? Do i buy individual staffs?  or an assortment?   Since I don't know exactly the name of the manufacturer, will that be a fatal hindrance?   Tbh, I'm not even sure what country of origin this movement is. Thank you!    
    • Thats why i asked that question earlier, what happens if lubrication is placed directly on top of epilame ?  As opposed to walled within its non epilamed area . I'm not saying its right, i have no idea , just asking questions. 
    • thinking of where epilam should be removed did you know there was a patent that covers this? At least for the escapement I'm attaching it. GB1057607A-1 epilame.pdf
    • Back home...printing now.  Will report results
    • Oh well, if Master @nickelsilver says it's the way to go, then it is the way to go! I stand corrected! 🫡 Are there any other places where you're supposed to remove the epilame from the contact point of rubbing? I don't think so! Thanks for the effort @Neverenoughwatches, much appreciated! 🙂👍
×
×
  • Create New...