Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've tried to lever off to no avail. In a post last year 'hammer' mentioned something about a thread on the shaft of his Brenray machine motor. I've tried holding other end of motor shaft in vice and twisting basket holder but with no success - I'm afraid to put too much pressure on the holder in case it distorts. The inside of holder is threaded - I have inserted screw to show this.

2lrpfbI.jpg

RmtCd65.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Watex said:

No sign of a roll pin.  One grub screw in basket holder and 2 grub screws in cylindrical section above. All grub screws removed.

Apologies, I need to read better. Sounds like it's just seized, might try a little heat to get them to come apart. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Dear Fellow Watchmakers

I note this regarding acquiring and servicing a Brenray cleaning machine. I have also purchased one of these. The machine works, with the motor running and the heating element heating up.

I am an amateur watchmaker in training at a rookie level, to say the least. My master has recommended that I service / re-wire this machine before use.

I'm not confident to undertake this myself and would prefer to hire the services of a professional (or at least someone who has undertaken a job like this before).

Would anyone in this thread be able to offer this service or know someone who would?

I am based in NW London

Kind regards

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, maclerche said:

Only if you have a functional RCD 

I think I'd disagree with that.  A GFI is safer so I agree would maybe have a greater chance of saving a life, however a ground frame will cause a regular fuse/breaker to go if the frame comes into contact with something hot.  i.e. without a grounded frame, a frayed hot wire makes contact with the frame and the whole machine is hot waiting for the operator to touch it (no doubt barefoot and standing in a puddle :) ) to provide a path to ground. 

 

Edited by measuretwice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, measuretwice said:

I think I'd disagree with that.  A GFI is safer so I agree would maybe have a greater chance of saving a life, however a ground frame will cause a regular fuse/breaker to go if the frame comes into contact with something hot.  i.e. without a grounded frame, a frayed hot wire makes contact with the frame and the whole machine is hot waiting for the operator to touch it (no doubt barefoot and standing in a puddle :) ) to provide a path to ground. 

 

I do not know what you call it in Canada (can you explain GFI?) but here in Denmark and most of EU we call it RCD or RCCD (old days HPFI) Anyway Here you can't have a private installation whiteout RCD (call it what you want) that turns off before a leak of 30 mA!  This is the only thing that can safe life. I agree that a ground will be a good idea as well.. but ground alone,  that will only safe your lift if you can be sure to have the same potential as the machine all the time... 

I think we are talking about the same but that it has different name here in EU and in US/CA?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device

 

https://www.consumerunitworld.co.uk/hager-cdc440u-rcd-four-pole-40a-30ma-2581-p.asp

 

Edited by maclerche
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, maclerche said:

I think we are talking about the same but that it has different name here in EU and in US/CA?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Residual-current_device

 

 it might be slightly different.  GFI is ground fault interrupt,  same idea as RCD.  Essentially It trips if current on both wires is not the same - as you say, its looking for a leak.   

afaik in North America these are only required by code in specific circumstances - bathrooms for example.  You'd not see them in typical outlets or workshops.  Even in bathrooms, GFI requirements are usually handle at the outlet level - circuit itself is not GFI protected.  While GFI/RCD might give some theoretical improved protection, it just doesn't seem to be a problem given the rest of the code;  people are not dying and its not common or code to have to use GFI breakers (afaik)

All circuits are protected by a breaker or fuse - that is code.  This trips if too much current is going through the hot side.  However it doesn't care where the current is going - so long as its not drawing more amps than its rating, it won't trip regardless if the current is safely flowing back neutral or flowing through your heart.    This is not a safety issue outside say bathrooms where a hair dryer could get dropped in a sink as its almost impossible for a hot wire to touch a person without touch the frame.  Since the frame is grounded (as per watchabit) if a hot wire does come loose and touch it, the breaker instantly goes as the current flows through the ground.

It would be a major safety faux pas imo to think grounding the frame would only  have a safety benefit if use a GFI/RCD.   The problem of suggesting that, is if the party is in place that does not use GFI, they might interpret it as "no point in grounding since its not GFI/RCD".  Not true.  That ground does save lives/stop fires with a fuse/breaker as the instant a hot touches something it trips the breaker and stops current flow.   GFI or not, you want the frame grounded imo.

Edited by measuretwice
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well stated MT,

When working on any vintage equipment with two wire power cords, I always change them out for a three wire grounded cord that is grounded to the chassis. In the US grounds are all connected together and to earth ground. Any leak from load side AC to ground will trip a circuit breaker. Btw, gfi's are code required near a water source. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 months later...

Hi can eney one help please .I have purchase a brenray watch caning machine it all seems to work ok but we would like to make sure that the motor is wired correctly . It states that it is 110 -220 volts . Can this run ok on or UK 240 volt or do we need to get it rewired to be able to use it I would be great full for eney advice 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Tracey19 said:

 It states that it is 110 -220 volts . Can this run ok on or UK 240 volt or do we need to get it rewired to be able to use it I would be great full for eney advice 

240V is actually the limit, typical values are around 230. All equipment labelled 220 accounts for that.

BTW, you had posted in the wrong section, also we have an introduction section where most members like to introduce themselves before asking questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi thankyou both for ur messies . I did not now hoe to go about talking to people on hear so I just added my message would eney one be able to addvice on how I would rewire the motel at all as I'm not sure it is wired correctly . The machine on ur link is not the same one as I have so wiring is diffeence thanks for eney help u can give 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi thankyou both for ur messies . I did not now hoe to go about talking to people on hear so I just added my message would eney one be able to addvice on how I would rewire the motel at all as I'm not sure it is wired correctly . The machine on ur link is not the same one as I have so wiring is diffeence thanks for eney help u can give 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi i can not see a model number on the motor at all i have taken it to a companie that does industrial motors the chap there said he thinks it is a 110 dc motor . He has tryed it 9n 240 ac it will spin slow with no resistants (you can stop with ur fingers) then he tryed it on a dc circuit at 50v dc and it span very good and it has risistence and the he tryed it at about 100 to 110 v dc and it span realy fast and risistence was good .seemed to have plenty of torce .also when u put it on to a 240 power it will start to smoke and as I explained had no risistence . So I am now stuck and don't now what to do I have supply ed pics as you can see 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yes, I was referring to the (jewelled) gear train with HP (most of the time, I use 1300, but when Rolex says 1000, I'll use 1000).
    • did I miss the update of the message of something changing?      
    • I suppose it would depend upon what your lubricating with those? for instance what does the manufacturer say about those lubricants? I have a PDF from the manufacture and a rather peculiar statement found on the bottom of the chart. my suspicion is the reason the recommending would be without epilam the HP oils like the spread except when they're in Ruby jewel's with steel pivots. tableEN lubrication 2020.pdf
    • These types of hairsprings become weak with age and very fragile. Which I expect it is that giving you trouble, and that wheel is not the correct one, if it were not bent I don't think the movement would run as the teeth are not the correct height. The problem you have is price which depends on you. It can be repaired but is it worth it to you, because there is little value in the clock. A wheel can be made and hairspring replaced. Or hang on to it and keep looking on ebay which is your best bet for replacement parts or even a complete movement but it will be like finding a needle in a haystack. 
    • I did that also for a few movements - well, mainly in/around the train jewels. I made big efforts to epilame the mainplate WITHOUT getting Epilame into the Pallet fork jewels (where it's not supposed to be, right?). I made litte barriers with Rodico around that jewel and used drops from a syringe to apply on the rest.  However, I've now stopped doing this. For three reasons: 1. It's a hassle and consumes more of this liquid gold. 2. I didn't see the need when using HP1000/HP1300 lubricants and grease for most part. The two places where I'd use 9010 (i.e. escape wheel and balance) receive Epilame in specific places... or the cap-jewel-setting of the balance suspends the oil sufficiently be capillary action (see my "conflict" about using Epilame on the balance jewels).  3. Lastly, and here I really wonder about yours and others' experiences: I felt that applying Epliame to the train jewels left them looking hazy (borderline dirty) compared to the (painstakingly achieved) sparkly clean results of my cleaning process. I just can't help but think that the Epilame residuals would mix with the oil and cause more friction/wear. I don't know.    simple: it'll stay there. It won't move any further. That's exactly what is happening if you epilame a cap stone. You end up placing the 9010 right on top of the epilame and the oil will sit nicely on that spot.
×
×
  • Create New...