Jump to content

Poljot 3133 chronograph


GeorgeClarkson

Recommended Posts

Wow, that's a nice one.  Hopefully that hairspring will straighten up nicely and get the piece up an running again.

I don't think it's a redial although I must admit I'm not an expert on Soviet pieces.  The quality appears to be about equal to what I have seen in pictures of other Sturmanskies.  It looks about right for it's age.

Very nice pickup.  :thumbsu:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RyMoeller said:

Wow, that's a nice one.  Hopefully that hairspring will straighten up nicely and get the piece up an running again.

I don't think it's a redial although I must admit I'm not an expert on Soviet pieces.  The quality appears to be about equal to what I have seen in pictures of other Sturmanskies.  It looks about right for it's age.

Very nice pickup.  :thumbsu:

Hope you are right....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, GeorgeClarkson said:

This is also my line of thought. I analyzed the pictures of the seller, and it does appear to be exactly like you wrote. Hope we are not both wrong on this, which seems a pretty easy fix to be honest.

To be honest even if the H/S is distorted beyond rescue (which I doubt is the case) it would be far from disastrous as it would appear that replacement could be relatively inexpensive if the link below is representative.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/3133-BALANCE-WHEEL-spring-spare-part-for-chronograph-POLJOT-OKEAN-SHTURMANSKIE-/282305942559?hash=item41babed41f:g:EBEAAOSwNRdX2sEY

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And today I received the Sturmanskie... As we thought, the hairspring is pretty badly bent, blocking the balance wheel. The movement was fully wound so I had son difficulty in letting the power loose, since the case is so dirty I am amazed I didn't find micropigs bathing in the lurky oil traces...

IMG_20170107_144318862.jpg

IMG_20170107_144329822.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The hairspring is be t on the locking pin and throughout the first curve in an unnatural way, sign that someone has tried to adjust the balance wheel but did it in a very clumsy way. I will have to see if I can still fix it.

Another thing I noticed, someone LSO put shims under the balance cock. You can barely see them but they are there. His is also why the screw stands a bit proud: the shims are not correctly placed so the screw touches them. Will have to figure out how to solve this...

IMG_20170107_144343751.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Here some sellers pictures of my newly acquired "baby". It's a 1992 Poljot "Sport" with a SU 3133 movement. It's made just before the disintegration of the Soviet Union and still has "Made in USSR" printed on the dial. Shortly after the disintegration, the print was changed to "Made in Russia".

It should be posted today ............ :jig:

Poljot Sport 3133:1981639-1.jpegPoljot Sport 3133:1981639-3.jpegPoljot Sport 3133:1981639-9.jpegPoljot Sport 3133:1981639-8.jpeg

Needless to say, I can't wait !!

 

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Watchtime I bought it like that. The pictures are taken by the seller and the watch is currently in transit. I must admit that the movement looks in an amazing shape, for being 25 years old. Studying the pictures, I haven't discovered any irregularities so I hope it is not one of those: "if it is too good to be true, it probably is". If you look on the very informative website: http://www.polmax3133.com/ , on the right-hand side "1992 - 1H", then under "Sport" you see the watch depicted. If you click on "Nuclear", the author makes a remark about how pristine the movement looks, a movement of the same time period.......... so perhaps I'm lucky?

Not knowing the watch history, I go from the assumption that it needs a service. I hope to see the watch in reality by the end of this week / begin next week.........

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good luck with the Poljot - it looks very good. I had a Sturmanskie 3133 a year or two ago. It was a nice watch but the chrono mechanism was getting very sticky and the movement looked a little rough here and there, so I sold it on. Made what I paid for it, so no problem there.

The 3133 is a nice movement.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@WillFly Thanks a lot ;) I looked at Sturmanskies, but in a way I wanted to get a bit away from the "military"-style. I succeeded partly with this "Sport" issue, but (I think) it has a Sturmanskie case. A bit of both worlds :) 

I'll post some pictures upon reception (first a test on the Watch-o-Scope) and perhaps later the servicing. Obviously forum member George Clarkson has done already some outstanding 3133 walk-through work.

But first my beaten up Landeron 48, which I hope to receive today. Lets call it "A nice Starter" :)

Landeron 48:2-1.jpeg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So yesterday I set myself up in checking the third Poljot 3133 I had received, this one only for the spare operating lever 8140 and spring 8335 that I needed for the Admiral watch.. And apart the fact the balance wheel assembly is completely missing, there are some other issues as well.... Check the pic... That is the minute runner wheel. Rust ate away the upper part that goes through the dial and onto which you should fix the minute runner hand.

IMG_20170123_170302178.jpg

IMG_20170123_170233703.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And the  fourth Poljot 3133 "Civil" arrived today, badly packaged inside a simple bubble envelope, bit still intact. Ironically, it sports a Seiko brown leather band.... Anyways it works fine and keeps excellent time from what I could see. No need to service this one, prolly only a light polish on the glass. Here it is side by side with the bigger brother, the Sturmanskie:

 

IMG_20170130_132053706.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
×
×
  • Create New...