Jump to content

Another Poor Seiko Pattern


jdm

Recommended Posts

I'm getting a bit disappointed with the conditions in brand new, not cheap Seikos are leaving the factory.

6R15 watch made in '14, has been used very few times.

Pic taken 95% power reserve, crown down.

I'm unsure what to do about or if just leave it alone. Messing with the balance / hs on these has proven a bet with large chances of doing worse.

24226537883_700d6029fd.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would say it is not beat error 0.1ms is well within tolerance also the amplitude is not good but I suspect something else is amiss. As a first step I would check it is not magnetised. If Ok then clean the escape components & check the pallets,check for end shake of the balance etc.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a reminder a timing machine cannot give correct numeric results if the pattern looks bad like this. Visually does it really look like a .1 ms Beat error? If you can't see the lines both of them what makes you think the timing machine can? Then the timing machine is averaging over time and right now it's averaging garbage. Then the line is slanting downwards wouldn't that indicates it is running slow Except numerically it says it's zero?

 

If we only look at part of it it might be considered some sort of weird escapement problem except you have dots much farther out than just escapement so demagnetising would be good. Then look if you see of the hairspring is bumping into anything. This is where audio real audio versus the synthetic ticking of the timing machine would be nice because if the hairspring is bumping in the something it makes a really interesting clanging musical sound.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi JDM,

Notice that you've the lift angle set at 52 degrees. I'm not an expert but discussions on other forum suggest that this should be set to 53 degrees for this caliber.

Might be worth checking the technical reference from Seiko if available.

Regards

Nad

Link to comment
Share on other sites

too many potential problems for a virtually new and lightly used watch. it's not what should be coming out of seiko's factory.

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Notice that you've the lift angle set at 52 degrees. I'm not an expert but discussions on other forum suggest that this should be set to 53 degrees for this caliber.

Might be worth checking the technical reference from Seiko if available.

Having set an incorrect lift angle does not cause the erratic pattern. In fact it doesn't even change the amplitude reading significantly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

For Seiko we know year and month of manufacturing from the first two digits of the serial number. In this case July 2014.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before taking things apart or making adjustments, I would also be curious to see what change, if any, you get by oiling the pallets.

Someone is interested in purchasing the watch, so I had to do something.

kept movement in case

removed upper jewel assembly, balance, winding weight, auto bridge and 2nd reduction wheel.

let power down

removed pallet bridge and pallet fork

oiled pallet jewel faces and balance staff lower pivot

reistalled parts

oiled upper jewel end stone.

winded fully, let rune few minutes, on timegrapher for regulation.

post-1542-0-47846600-1455208972_thumb.jp

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

too many potential problems for a virtually new and lightly used watch. it's not what should be coming out of seiko's factory.

 

I just bought a Hamilton Jazzmaster GMT and the GMT hand is not working properly. It is on a 24 hour dial but instead of moving 1/2 the distance on the 12 hour dial thus measuring 1 hour on the 24 hour dial it goes 4 times the distance; thus measuring 4 hours on the 24 hour dial in an hour on the 12 hour dial. This shouldn't be happening in a new watch and this is the 2nd watch I've had in as many weeks! The first Hamilton Jazzmaster GMT just stopped working altogether after a day! 

 

I purchased the Hamilton because I heard many good things about them but I am beginning to wonder.

 

Dave

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many of these watches can be sitting in a shop display window for a very long time, sometimes several years, before being purchased. It's not unusual to have a "new" mechanical watch with a poor reading under these circumstances.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Shouldn't the seller be responsible for checking this out? After all, the watch should be under warranty. Of course, it is almost impossible to ensure a store will have a watchmaker on staff.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Have meet another one with pretty much the same symptoms, again 6R15 movement from '14, to which I've given the same cure as mentioned above.

I'm still not happy with the amplitude. It must be related to lubrication because I've learned to handle pallet fork and balance assembly with the utmost respect,

When I look at the end stone just removed it had a tiny, perfectly round and centered spot of oil. The one which I'm able to reapply is never so good, and probably excessive. I'm thinking about getting an automatic oiler or at least and high quality Bergeon one.

Also wonder if pallet special oil could help ?!?

 

Before

post-1542-0-05927700-1456230398_thumb.jp

 

After

post-1542-0-58755300-1456230402_thumb.jp

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Might that be the viscous nature of oil resisting gravity H  ,  we have been comparing water and hydrophobic surfaces which are similar in principle but water is much less viscous than oil. I guess what we trying to discover is if epilame also has an adhesive trait as well as being oleophobic. Plus the oil dropet has very little mass for gravity to work on, like watching tiny water beads that can grip onto vertical glass until they are connected together to increase their mass then run down. 
    • But it also makes it seem less susceptible to gravity. If you place a droplet of oil on an epilame-treated surface the droplet of oil will still stay in place even if you then flip the surface from a horizontal to a vertical position. That is, the oil droplet remains anchored, and that's the purpose of epilame. If it was just a matter of creating an oleophobic surface we could probably use other, less expensive, methods!? I don't know @Waggy but my gut feeling tells me you're spot on (pun intended!). I believe the oleophobic property is a side effect of epilame which is designed to keep the oil anchored.
    • Saturday morning 27/4 Sunday evening 28/4 Monday evening 29/4 Floor has a drain in the middle so I am hoping that there is very little fall on it, if any. Room is about 2.5 x 2.5 metres square. Can only use about 1/2 of one wall on the right of the pictures which has a sliding glass door in it. And only about 3/4 of the wall to the left of the pictures as it has the door to the house in it. Progress. 🙂 
    • This makes much more sense now, the oil is withdrawing itself to make as little contact with the epilame as possible. Same principle as wax on a car creates a hyrophobic surface that makes the cohesive properties of water molecules pull together.  The water beads run off only when under the influence of gravity but still remain cohesively beaded up. And as mentioned earlier a pivot would keep the oil in place on a cap jewel.  Epilame on an escapement would be a different scenario, there is nothing to hold the oil in position if gravity tugs at the bead to move, plus the escape teeth pull the oil about Maybe this is why its suggested to run the watch for a short while to remove the epilame to make two oleophobic surfaces either side of the oil, creating a ring of fire 🔥 around it 😅 The oil is repelled by every surface of the epilame even that which it sits upon. So the oil pulls together to make as little contact with it as possible, but the oil cant float above that area, it can only sit there on top of it. Under gravity the oil could potentially run away as an oil bead, unless the epilame has an adhesive property which i dont think it does ? So something else keeps it in position ie a pivot under a cap jewel . But that isn't the case in a pallet jewel situation. 
    • As with every skill it watchmaking, it takes practice. Notice at the top of the document it says, "Practical work - 40 hours".  I can get the balance wheels 'close enough' to flat, but never seem to get them perfect. Same with gear wheels. Guess I need more practice.
×
×
  • Create New...