Jump to content

Which Watch Have You Got Coming In The Mail ? Show Us !!!


SCOTTY

Recommended Posts

I'm very keen to see what is inside those two, particularly the Tissot as they did a lot of interesting movements.

I would suspect the Tissot is 1940s maybe 1950s from the styling, and the Precisa looks to be 1970s.

Both are fine looking watches, and should clean up nicely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps not as spectacular as the Tissot, or the Precisa, but both interesting in their own ways.

AsPurchased-Cropped.thumb.jpg.940c0f4ef88ffb39855450a298068515.jpg

AsPurchaed-Cropped.jpg.2a9453ed28949a55e9bcdd4cefffd641.jpg

An "overwound" 1972 Kelton Armachoc, and a Kienzle, probably from the late 1980s

While I have a number of Timex branded watches of this period, this is the first Kenton branded one for the 404 club.

For those interested, there is a short history of the Kelton brand here -> https://www.kelton.fr/story-_l_EN_r_12.html

The example here, has a British made case and in fact, from what I have read the entire watch batch may have been produced in the UK, for the French market. Likewise some of the French made components may have wound up in UK made watches from time to time.

The simple dial of the Kienzle will make it a nice addition to my small Kienzle collection, assuming I can find or fabricate a suitable stem and get it working of course.

Kienzle has a much longer history as a manufacturer of both watches and clocks.

More here -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kienzle_Uhren

Both were 0.99p plus postage, so both will hopefully make it in to the 404 club.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/7/2022 at 5:07 PM, Tony13 said:

Thank you. It might take a while before I start on this one. I am just a hobby watchmaker and do not always have the funds to buy everything I need in one go. These Tudor's usually turn out quite nice when there done I will keep this post in mind.

Don't worry, i've been using Birthdays and christmas's to subsidise the tool collection. Just need to get myself some decent hand removal levers and hand setting tool.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/11/2022 at 12:12 AM, AndyHull said:

I'm very keen to see what is inside those two, particularly the Tissot as they did a lot of interesting movements.

I would suspect the Tissot is 1940s maybe 1950s from the styling, and the Precisa looks to be 1970s.

Both are fine looking watches, and should clean up nicely.

Thanks Andy 

I have not opened these yet but both are spectacular in there own state.

The Tissot was $150 and the Precisa was just $25 . I think the seller did not know this was a real class act watch.

Also I was the only bider. All I did was buff the crystal and clean the case and it started from the cleaning .

The Tissot I have not heard this brand I just loved the look so if it is as old as you think it makes it even more desirable.

Both these are dead on time even after even 48 hours they are within 3 seconds slow.

Both look like they were sitting drawer for years and years.

When I wear either one I get people asking just what they are even one guy offered me 200 on the Precisa. 

But not just yet I love these so much.

You guys have such great taste in old watches , enjoy all the pictures of these.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AsPurchasedCropped-l1600.thumb.jpg.39921730305ae180ca1110ab29b15116.jpg

A Lancyl (Langendorf) pocket watch, possibly from the 1930s, from the bargain bins on ebay is heading my way.

The "cyl" part of Lancyl suggests this is likely to be a cylinder escapement movement.

Langendorf were known for high quality fully jewelled Swiss lever escapement movements, but they also  continued to produce cylinder escapement movements into the 1950s

A non runner, it also has three holes drilled in the back of the art deco case, suggesting it has been fitted on the dash of a car or possibly in an aircraft at some stage in its history.

AsPurchasedDamageCropped-l1600.jpg.731009fce3d927bb7ff084d5cdbb3b9d.jpg

Whatever bracket or strap it was fitted to has long since left the scene.

There are no other clues, and no broad arrow marks or anything like that to suggest it has a military connection, but it is  an interesting little item none the less.

The fun part of course will be bringing it back to life.

image.png.0c10eceb375a6880c8ce5844b2d31908.png

Maybe I need to get myself a Sopwith camel to put it in.

image.thumb.png.92f85f18b53199ca0a8bf25ac1f13b23.png

(Lanco Langendorf factory ca.1958) The factory now appears to be a Migros Supermarket.

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks a lot better than the ebay lot I just picked up for a pound.

Strangely there were no other bidders. I can't think why. 😋
AsPurchasedCropped-l1600.thumb.jpg.7afeaeacd02bdfcae7cb0d37ba50e192.jpg

Description was "...these are finds with a detector bits and pieces maybe of interest to somebody the one pocket watch is a waltham..."

You never know, there might be something useful in there, and if not, I can always use all that dirt to grow a few potatoes.

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This was shipped out to me yesterday, should have it on monday.. was a steal at a whopping $35.00. Only bad thing is it looks like someone has swapped out the original cathedral hands for this set, not sure why but I doubt I can source an original set, oh well. 

Will probably just resell it once it comes at a good price and let someone restore it.

 

Screenshot_20220121-111834_Poshmark.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AsPurchasedDial-l1600.thumb.jpg.b3cc2e7b5ae5b61247d8ce7ab7a27672.jpg

A French Japy Freres & Cie. Beaucourt argentan key wind and key set pocket watch , some time after ca. 1850 for 0.99p

AsPurchasedMechanism-l1600.thumb.jpg.d55d06db1e58b11b3da3caded3154e12.jpg

The glass is in rough shape, but may be polish-able , and the dial, similarly is pretty rough.
The adjuster is worryingly skewed, suggesting the balance shaft is possibly damaged, but for the price, I can't complain.

It is obviously also in dire need of a clean and service.

AsPurchasedCase-l1600.thumb.jpg.9f98df6e3b58381f08d8826e789f1d74.jpg

image.png.ccb9c9d47e94b6abb925c9905ce9de57.png

image.png.28190cb3af5680da59606a0f52722d01.png(source)

More about Freres & Cie. here.

 

 

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good point. I just tracked down a possible candidate for the movement and a slightly closer estimate for the age at around 1880, which suggests it may be as much as 140 years old.

Hopefully its not working simply because its gummed up, however it could be that there is wear on the escapement, which would be a lot more troublesome. Time will tell.
 

image.png.864e80f22831e747db08ad827608490c.png

http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&&2uswk&Japy_16

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, oldhippy said:

It doesn't have a balance staff that is a cylinder movement. 

image.png.c2dd33f658530be25625cd010d46adc8.png

The ebay images might actually show evidence of some "fat thumb" activity. That looks suspiciously like a deformed hairspring in the lower left quadrant of the balance wheel.

If that is all that is wrong with it, hopefully I should be able to get it running fairly easily. It will be a few weeks before I get a chance to verify this however, but I'll keep you all posted when I do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wear is a distinct possibility, especially given how grubby the movement looks. The mainspring spring does indeed look pretty substantial, so I will be letting that down very carefully assuming it isn't broken or gunked up solid.


There is a blog post about a very similar watch with a nearly identical movement complete with even more history of Japy -> here <-

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
    • Murks, The rate and amplitude look OK, and the amplitude should improve once the oils you have used get a chance to move bed-in, also I notice that you are using default 52 degrees for the lift angle, if you get the real lift angle (assuming it's not actually 52) this will change your amplitude - maybe higher, maybe lower. I notice that the beat error is a little high, but not crazy high. At the risk of upsetting the purists, if the balance has an adjustment arm I would go ahead and try and get this <0.3 ms, but if it does not have an adjustable arm then I would probably leave well alone. Just my opinion.
×
×
  • Create New...