Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

One additional thing to note   this unit has an 8 inch working range (distance to work) which  is great for me  most of the other units at this price were lower in range. 

 

Jim

Posted

After doing some research and pondering the idea of getting a microscope, I found one on the 'bay this weekend. It was delivered just a few hours ago. It is a 1970's American Optics Stereo Star 569. I really can't complain taking into consideration that the price was ridiculous and it included delivery. It does need some cleaning up, but other than that it is in very good shape.

 

It came with 15x optics and the zoom range is from .7-3.0x. I think this will do nicely for my needs. I have not touched a microscope since biology class back in the 70's. So it is going to take me some time to get used to it.

 

21289946260_0ca6261a76_c.jpg

 

Once I finished setting it up, I noticed that I have approximately 4-5 inches of clearance to work under the scope. I just have no idea if that will be enough for working with watches.

 

I am thinking about getting some 10x opticals and see if that increases the work area. I also found a 0.5x Auxiliary lens and, according to what I've read, that will increase the work space. I may give that a try.

 

Looking for some advice from those with experience working with these types of scopes.

  • Like 1
Posted

I'm using the similar Bausch & Lomb StereoZoom 5 & 7 scopes and you should get the 0.5x lens. It'll give you an extra 50% or so of working distance. It's probably a good idea to get to 10x eyepieces as well to get a zoom range suitable for horological work.

 

With my setup (10x eyepieces + 0.5 Barlow lens) I get 168mm (6.6") working distance on the StereoZoom 5, with a zoom range of 4x to 20x.

 

On the StereoZoom 7 the working distance is 127mm (5") and the zoom range is 5x to 35x.

 

$_12.JPG

  • Like 1
Posted
  On 9/17/2015 at 6:59 AM, clockboy said:

I have a similar scope I use it above my lathe and for really close work to see what is actually happening.

 

I see how this setup will be convenient for lathe work since it has a great travel range. I don't own a lathe (don't even know how to use one) but would love to learn.

Posted

Rob,

 

Thank you for the information. I just ordered a 0.5x lens for it and it should be here early next week. I am having a difficult time finding the 10x eye pieces for this model, but will continue looking for them.

  • 5 months later...
Posted

I have been looking for a while for a desktop microscope. I have stereo microscope above my lathe but now need a desktop microscope but not sure what magnification I will need. I guess a stereo microscope is the way to go but any advise will be much appreciated.

Posted

i am in the same boat. a stereo 'scope is the way to go. i am a bit in the dark when it comes to magnification. what to buy. some of the 'scopes on fleabay are cheaper to buy new, i have noticed. a trinocular is nice for being able to take pictures of your work.

Posted

The desktop microscope I use is this

Free Shipping !! 3.5X-90X! 50/50 SPLIT SIMUL-FOCAL MICROSCOPE DOUBLE BOOM STAND TRINOCULAR STEREO ZOOM MICROSCOPE

http://s.aliexpress.com/qQ3mInia

Arrived within 7 days of ordering & it's fantastic. I've enclosed some images using the 0.5x lense. TBH I've never needed the 1x lense that was also supplied with the microscope as I really don't need to work that closely. 74020f3f19bfa2affe559fd1d8f299fe.jpg2a323a6d41595a4e0c8aa3f0332e5527.jpgcf1854ab0e18a202bc0d7408fcb8861e.jpg

Normal 150mm working distance 350ca05b46842c7e0810fbe1d108aeba.jpg

Zoomed in to cap jewel 1916af0c3a6c18bf36ddc0bcb38a3bd1.jpg

It's TRINOCULAR so you don't have to switch between eyepiece & camera.

Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk

  • Like 2
Posted

After a lot of searches I picked up last night this well used Olympus microscope. The clarity of image is incredible aided by a ring light so no shadows. The eyepiece is 10x but what the total mag is I am not sure but it is big. The other feature is you can adjust the aperture so in effect you can look at the whole movement in detail & the light source is via a "Intralux" unit.   It needs a clean but the absolute quality was the selling point for me. Price £200.

 

post-234-0-87512000-1458378794_thumb.jpg

 

post-234-0-22973300-1458378805_thumb.jpg

 

post-234-0-06697600-1458378814_thumb.jpg

Posted

That's a nice m/scope CB.

 

Is that an aperture adjustment or a zoom adjustment? i.e. when you turn it does the image in the eyepiece get bigger and smaller, or does it get lighter and darker?

 

If that control affects the brightness of the image without changing the magnification then it is indeed an aperture control and what it does allow you to do is to increase the depth of focus at the cost of a darker image, but the numbers on the control ring don't look right for that.

 

If turning the ring changes the magnification then it is a zoom control and the level of magnification is worked out by multiplying the eyepiece mag (10X in this case) by the number on the ring.

The numbers that I can see on the ring are 0.7 and 1.0, giving 7X mag and 10X mag, but I suspect that it goes up to 3.0 or 4.0 or higher, to give 30X, 40X etc.

 

The nice thing about this is that if you want a less powerful range you can get 5X mag eyepieces, or for more magnification 15X or 20X eyepieces. And eyepieces can be had for very reasonable money compared to the m/scope as a whole.

 

The light source is a nice touch too. 

Posted

My set up (Wild Heerbrugg M5) in standard trim has fixed settings for 6X, 12X, 25X, and 50X and to honest I rarely use it beyond 25X, and most of the time it is either 6X or 12X.

I do have a variable aperture module that I can add in which also ups the magnification by 1.25X, so that then gives me 7.5X, 15X, 31.25X, and 62.5X. This doesn't often get used because of the light loss, but again, 15X mag is more than enough.

 

If I were to add new eyepieces I would go for wide field 5X. This would give me a wider field of view, and a brighter image, without sacrificing the magnification range that I use.

I have seen these available for as little as £15 a pair but I have no idea of the quality.

  • 1 month later...
Posted
  On 9/17/2015 at 6:18 PM, Rob said:

I'm using the similar Bausch & Lomb StereoZoom 5 & 7 scopes and you should get the 0.5x lens. It'll give you an extra 50% or so of working distance. It's probably a good idea to get to 10x eyepieces as well to get a zoom range suitable for horological work.

 

With my setup (10x eyepieces + 0.5 Barlow lens) I get 168mm (6.6") working distance on the StereoZoom 5, with a zoom range of 4x to 20x.

 

On the StereoZoom 7 the working distance is 127mm (5") and the zoom range is 5x to 35x.

Expand  

Hello Rob. I was wondering if you could help me being you have a Bausch & Lomb Stereo Zoom 7 microscope. I have one too and I want to buy the .5x barlow lens but I can not find any reference to it on the net other than a general barlow lens with a 48mm thread size. Is this the right size threads? Does it matter if I purchase one made for any scope as long as it has 48mm threads? I also saw a reference to a .25x barlow lens that gives you 10 1/2" working distance in the manual but can not find it anywhere. Do you know where I might be able to find this lens? Many thanks in advance, friend.

Posted
  On 4/30/2016 at 3:11 PM, taran2ula said:

I want to buy the .5x barlow lens but I can not find any reference to it on the net other than a general barlow lens with a 48mm thread size. Is this the right size threads? Does it matter if I purchase one made for any scope as long as it has 48mm threads? I also saw a reference to a .25x barlow lens that gives you 10 1/2" working distance in the manual but can not find it anywhere. Do you know where I might be able to find this lens?

Expand  

The lenses have a special construction with metal pins on the sides, so you need lenses specifically made for the StereoZoom 7. (The ones for the StereoZoom 5 are different for example.)

The catalogue numbers for the lenses are:

  • 31-27-08 = 0.25x
  • 31-27-04 = 0.5x
  • 31-27-05 = 1.5x
  • 31-27-06 = 2x

I have all except the 1.5x one, and I got them all from eBay. They usually show up there from time to time.

Note that the 0.25x one has a working distance of 266mm which makes it unsuitable for horology work unless you have very long arms.

Here are some images with dimensions:

Lenses2.jpg

Lenses1.jpg

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Well thank you kindly for your reply. It is seemingly impossible to find any lenses for this model scope so I guess I bought the wrong scope for what I intend to do with it. I am going to be setting small gem stones and I need some working distance in order to get the graver tool under thew scope. I will return this scope and buy something else. Many thanks for your help.

Posted

Hello friend. I found an .05x lens but my stereo zoom 7 did not come with a stock objective lens. Do I need a stock objective lens in order to use this .05x lens? Or can I only use the .05x lens by itself without a factory objective lens? Do you know if there instructions to set the alignment and all that jazz? Many thanks friend.

Posted
  On 5/2/2016 at 9:58 PM, taran2ula said:

Do I need a stock lens in order to use this .05x lens? Or can I only use the .05x lens alone? 

Expand  

The lenses are used on their own and are plug 'n play. No need for aligning etc.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Thanks for the information, its a big help. I'll try and pull off the pipe. I think I'll try using the Presto hand remover. Then I guess I'll try to fit the pipe into the hands(?) though maybe I won't have to as I'm putting a new set of hands on the movement. 
    • One of the problems with chronograph hands and whoever manufactured the watch would be that often times they are put on with considerable force. The problem with the amount of force they go on with is that often times when removed they disintegrate. So disintegrating hands unfortunately is quite common on a chronograph. With those lucky enough to have an account with were be authorized by whoever made the watch or the service center they would have a complete package of hands. so yes that does look like the brass tube of the hand that disintegrated.  
    • The unfortunate problem of the three jar cleaning machine. At least I assume it's a three jar machine. Classically with three jar machine the first is a cleaner and the second to be a rinse of the same type. Cleaning is a interesting process and it's not exactly cleaning and rinsed the entire procedure is cleaning. The cleaner is supposed to have chemicals to put things in the solution and things to make things right and shiny. The rinse continues to put things in solution and reduces the concentration of things in the fluid on the plates. Ideally you should have two rinses not one and alcohol. If you look at the modern cleaning machines you find typically now they will have a minimum of four jars or whatever. Often times the last one will have alcohol because depending upon where you live the rinse itself may not evaporate. So you have a final rinse of alcohol just to rinse off the rinse. Then the only thing I've ever seen on baskets would be this quoted below from something Omega has. But they are assuming that you have genuine Elma baskets and not a machine made in India from unknown materials. Although a lot of people are using the baskets from India I just don't know enough about them. Personally I've see in the baskets for other machines especially the holder which would be as it's implied below nickel plated where the plating wears off and eventually the brass will be etched away from the chemicals in the cleaning product. One thing I didn't see you mention was how long in the each of the baths? Usually for the cleaning products that make things bright and shiny. Time-limited approximately 4 minutes works really well. The rinses of less of concern it depends upon how much the cleaning fluid is dissolved in it though. You can download the specifications the cleaning products I like they have recommended times the final alcohol rinse is supposed to be relatively short as any time we mention alcohol and watches people get excited over dissolving the shellac. But typically with isopropyl alcohol it takes a little while longer and I've even used alcohol which I know dissolves shellac but I was just using it to rinse off the rinse so it was never a problem.  
    • I think i am done. I was working withe two pieces, one was 316 SS and the other 304 SS. The starting material for 304 was thinner, so I opted for finishing it. Since I only have images of one of these watches, I cannot know the exact dimensions. The owner is not critical...just wants a working solution. I think this is it. It was quite the challenge to turn the inside  locking rim. An inside angle cut. Had to be damn close in order to have a snap fit. Frankly I think I just got lucky. Sometimes lucky is better than smart! The inside edge that interfaces with the crystal is an interference fit. This was on purpose in case my locking-edge cut was overshot...then the bezel and crystal would work together to stay put. Tens of hours working on this, and I learned a lot!    
    • I'm using: 2.5L Elma WF Pro – New Formula for the main cleaning 2.5L Elma Suprol Pro – New Formula for the first rinse Isopropanol Alcohol IPA 99.99% for the final rinse So far, all fresh fluids. I was also under the impression they shouldn’t cause rust, so I’m wondering if maybe the damage was already there and is just progressing now. Because my baskets came with the machine when I bought it pre-owned, I’m not sure if they’re original Elma or not. That’s exactly why I’m hesitant to buy a new set—I don’t want to end up with lower quality clones again if that’s what these are.
×
×
  • Create New...