Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm considering getting a stereo microscope, around the £400-£500 mark. Someones recommended this one to me

Ebay item  191085725004

which I've almost brought a couple of times this week, but can anyone give me an alternative recommendation.Also having never actually used one (which is probably the reason I've hesitated on buying it) do they make life easier, are they easy to get to grips with?

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 322
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Hello Everyone, I am going to share the details of my adventure with a trinocular stereo microscope and a digital camera attached to it. I bought a second hand AmScope SM-1T (1st purchase) and I

Hi Lee, That looks like a nice piece of kit, albeit somewhat over specified. I have been using a Wild Heergrugg M5 now for about 4 years courtesy of an amazing car boot sale find and I wouldn't be

Cant get enough of my scope. its transformed my life!

Posted Images

Hi Lee,

That looks like a nice piece of kit, albeit somewhat over specified.

I have been using a Wild Heergrugg M5 now for about 4 years courtesy of an amazing car boot sale find and I wouldn't be without it. For me the advantages are a much better view of proceedings (obviously) and a much more comfortable working position as it allows a more upright seating stance, not so hunched up. Proper stereo is important for judging distance.

My setup gives me 6, 12, 25, & 50 times mag as standard but it came with an attachment which allows control over depth of focus and increases mag by a factor of 1.25. I use 6 & 12 for most stuff, 25 for hair spring work, and 50 for inspecting jewels and pivots. More than that is of little or no use. One very important factor is working distance (how much room between the watch and the object lens when in focus) as you have to be able to get your tools in there. Mine varies from 12-15cm if I remember rightly which is fine. The one you're looking at states 10cm but that may well change with different magnification, and if that is the max then it's worth asking exactly how it changes as this may well restrict its usefulness. One other word of warning; cleanliness takes on a whole new meaning under 50x mag. Be prepared to get a bit obsessive about it (not a bad thing in a watchmaker).

It's quite a lot of money to shell out though so worth asking about the working distance. And if restricting the mag to 50 - 75x saves money then that's worth considering as you won't miss the higher mag in practice.

Have fun.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

to be honest I haven't the faintest idea what I need. the one I linked was one another watch repairer has & he sent me the link. the specs are boggling I assume I need a zoom version for ease? & I like taking images of things I do to (currently use a USB microscope & a camera.)

 

Lee

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm considering getting a stereo microscope, around the £400-£500 mark. Someones recommended this one to me

 

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Trino-Zoom-Microscope-with-Single-Arm-Stand-for-electronics-inspection-solder-/191085725004?pt=UK_BOI_Medical_Lab_Equipment_Lab_Equipment_ET&hash=item2c7d98c54c

 

which I've almost brought a couple of times this week, but can anyone give me an alternative recommendation.

 

Also having never actually used one (which is probably the reason I've hesitated on buying it) do they make life easier, are they easy to get to grips with?

 

Lee

Im looking for a stereo microscope myself. The only problem this microscope needs to be ordered from germany. I understand an adaptor is available to increase the working distance to 100mm from actual lens to subject. Rememeber also cheap zooms equals poor quality...better with fixed focal length. A microscope would definitely make life easier. There are others options which you can order from within the uk. Let me know your decision.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I got my Inspection style microscope from Brunel Microscopes ~ £180

 

http://www.brunelmicroscopes.co.uk/longarm.html it's excellent and having a longer focal length gives plenty of room for tools. I also bought a USB eyepiece camera to take watch movement photograph's

That looks a good option Odyseus. What like is the image viewing quality with the lens supplied...is their diopter adjustment.

Edited by djmcd
Link to post
Share on other sites

I did look at that one Odyseus which is why I asked the question "I assume I need the zoom version" because I liked the price of the Brunel one, but thought the eBay one seemed to have more spec.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I just got the standard version but I also bought lower power eyepieces too (x10 is standard and I also bought some X5 eyepieces). The microscope comes with three objectives and I use the lowest power one.

It really is an excellent microscope for working on watches !!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unfortunately it's my experience that it just isn't possible to have all that you need in this game. There will always be another gadget, widget, or tool that you just can't do without. Or is that just me?

Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk

Link to post
Share on other sites

These stereo arm microscopes are a lot easier to use and work with than loupes IMHO :)

Yes the BM1 doesn't have variable zoom. ( you have to change the objectives ) but mine is always set for minimum zoom and that's perfect for working on watch mechanisms. !!

Link to post
Share on other sites

If you look on my blog, you see some photo's taken with USB microscope eyepiece CAM !!

I hope you're getting commission for selling these? I too have been thinking about one for quite a while now.

This watch business fair gets a grip o' ye!

Link to post
Share on other sites

These stereo arm microscopes are a lot easier to use and work with than loupes IMHO :)

Yes the BM1 doesn't have variable zoom. ( you have to change the objectives ) but mine is always set for minimum zoom and that's perfect for working on watch mechanisms. !!

What is the distance between the centre of the vertical column and the centre axis of the objective lens when the extension arm is straight?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • jdm pinned this topic

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nucejoe has made some good points about the calendar mechanism. If the watch physically stops at least the hands stop and the secondhand keeps going that means the watch train is running it means that it's a disconnect between the gear train and our minute hand in calendar mechanism. The Canon opinion which I'm going but I guess is the type that snaps into a drive wheel. The drive wheel is driven by the gear train the Canon pinion goes on the post there is no friction there. If the friction between the drive wheel in the Canon pinion disintegrates which he can then with the least amount of friction like a calendar mechanism it just quit striving. The hands come to a stop the watch keeps running the secondhand keeps moving because it's independence of all of this. It should have been obvious when the watch was going to gather and you check the setting mechanism before you put the calendar on you would have noticed zero friction as a guess. Even now when you go into hands setting you'll feel like there's no friction at all. Then the reason why the calendar mechanism works when you manually rotate the hands is because the setting wheel is driving the Canon pinion directly which is driving the calendar mechanism and that our wheel and all of that so all of that will run from that we just will not run from the gear train running the drive wheel that's connected to the Canon pinion. But that's just my wild guess and then we throw in Nucejoe's possible calendar mechanism increased friction than we need to really isolate all of this or we can continue to guess.  
    • I am not sure if I correctly understand you here. Only the seconds hand keeps running or minute and hour hands do move too, in case minute and hour hands move and show time right, then the fault is in date change train including date jumper mech, but if it doesn't show time correctly ( appear to loose time) then its loose canon pinion. You can tighten a loose canon pinion, use grease to lube it, not oil.
    • Thank you for your introduction and welcome to this friendly forum.
    • always confusing when it's two separate watches but I'm going to assume they're basically identical. What was their condition before you service them in other words did have a problem before and the problem came after you've serviced or was the problems there before? Then timing machine results you do have a timing machine don't you? In other words what's the running condition of the watch like of the watches barely running that would be an issue for a calendar change   then you fix the problem? so I'm guessing we only have to worry about the 2778 then? Yes this is what happens when you have multiple watches with too much going on it becomes confusing. then it would be helpful to have a picture of the dial side components because we didn't memorize every single calendar change mechanism. one of the places to look is the Canon pinion assembly in other words to visit have enough force to drive the calendar mechanism? I'm having to guess because I'm not finding a good tech sheet that shows the parts. If it's a kinda Canon pinion I think which is the Canon pinion that slips into her presses into with friction with the wheel if it no longer has and the friction then a cannot drive the calendar but if you manually set the watch that drives the Canon pinion directly and everything should function. then if you two of the parts list it would be listed as canon pinion with drive wheel. .But it would be helpful in the picture just to make sure http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&ETA_2778  
    • I think what the problem here is you're asking the wrong question. The question is what part number do I need so that I can end up with the correct balance? Or the correct balance staff for that matter? If you look at the second link it lists the parts for your watch. This is always where things get interesting? you'll notice for balance staff they list seven different ones. For balance complete they do show three but if you look at the part numbers there's only two. then I attached some images from bestfit online and of course additional problems perhaps. Notice you have lots of choices and probably only one that's right. then the physical bestfit book becomes interesting because is an indication that there are variations which is of course why there so many listed in the images. but fortunately it looks like you want the basic simple one which should be 100/66.  unfortunately for the third link it's out of stock. then providing this is the right staff number I snipped out a couple of more images of the bestfit book which is what the dimensions mean and the dimensions. One of the irritating things of the physical book is on the dimension chart if you're trying to find a particular staff you just have to be lucky to go through the list and find it it be really nice if they list of the sizes by the numeric staff also. http://www.ranfft.de/cgi-bin/bidfun-db.cgi?10&ranfft&0&2uswk&AS_1287 http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=AS_1287 http://cgi.julesborel.com/cgi-bin/matcgi2?ref=U\ZD]J http://www.julesborel.com/s.nl/it.A/id.151223/.f  
×
×
  • Create New...