Jump to content

Recommended Posts

20 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

would hit the "Buy it now" button! The seller determines the price. However, if the price was a million dollars I would politely and respectfully let the seller know the price I'm willing to pay (provided I'm interested in the item). If the seller then decided to go ballistic over my offer it is not my responsibility.

I have to agree, a buyer will only pay the maximum amount that he thinks the item is worth to him. I get this all the time when i go to car boots, i ask the price and if it's above what i want to pay then i either state what i want to pay or say thanks and walk away. Quite a few take the ump and tell me "its worth every penny and more"  of their price, my reply is the same every time   " it might be, but not to me ". Its that simple, its what it's worth to you and not anyone else. If it comes in for less then thats a bonus for you. I dont think a little bit of education passed onto a genuine seller is doing any harm, if hes upset then its probably because hes been caught out or been wildy disillusioned. Either way that isn't your problem. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Don't get me started on the so called "free market" and all its pseudo-scientific mumbo jumbo.

Free markets are nearly extincted. Perhaps eBay is one of the last few left, but most of what we "officially" buy is at rigged prices in a rigged "money"-system.

Perhaps in the not too far future they have printed so much of these confetti $ / £ / € that you have to pay indeed a million "confetti-notes" for a Rolex  🫢

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

We won't be able to breath the air or drink the water, but we will be rich I tell you RICH!! 🤑

Yes, we're supposed to worry about CO2 emissions (making the planet greener and more prosperous), but not to worry one bit about pollution, nuclear weapons, and WWIII. It's a sad world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

Don't worry that we are poisoning the planet, killing ourselves with corn syrup and cheep ass food and

No no no Andy you've got it all wrong mate, clearly nothing at all to do with money. It was ideal American solution/experiment to make everyone's fast paced life easier and more convenient. No point eating healthily, what's the point of that, no nothing at all to do with money 🤨. I heard something once it went like this  # why are there no windows in food processing plants ?  So that nobody can see what's going on ! # 🤣 thats stuck in my head ever since i heard it . "THE BIG FAT LIE"

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

Perhaps in the not too far future they have printed so much of these confetti $ / £ / € that you have to pay indeed a million confetti-notes for a Rolex  🫢

Yep, nothing but a system to keep the common man enslaved.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to confess that Harry Enfield was much more amusing than my fellow Scot, and so called father of economics, Adam Smith.

Smith did delve much deeper into what drives the wheels of trade than most people imagine.

Its a pretty tough and stodgy read for modern tastes though.

Most people have heard of his work "The wealth of nations." (strictly speaking its actually called "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations", but that is a bit of a mouth full), but far fewer have encountered "The Theory of Moral Sentiments".

Smith's "Wealth of Nations" is much misquoted and rarely read by those who profess to follow the capitalist religion, but such is the way of blind faith followers. Few if any of these religiose zealots will have even heard of , nor be interested in his theory of moral sentiments, despite its in depth analysis of the very behaviours they indulge in. 

image.png.8d936637467e79518cca306acf00c724.png

I doubt that he realised when he penned his works that they would be so often used to attempt to vindicate the baser inclinations of the greedy some 265 years later.

If you are ever in the area, you might like to take a trip down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh to the Cannon Gate church, and ponder a while with him, the changes that have taken place since his time. As to actually reading his works... I suspect you may need to stock up on the extra strong coffee before you dive in, but they are, arguably worth the effort.

"As we have no immediate experience of what other men feel, we can form no idea of the manner in which they are affected, but by conceiving what we ourselves should feel in the like situation. Though our brother is on the rack, as long as we ourselves are at our ease, our senses will never inform us of what he suffers. They never did, and never can, carry us beyond our own person, and it is by the imagination only that we can form any conception of what are his sensations. Neither can that faculty help us to this any other way, than by representing to us what would be our own, if we were in his case. It is the impressions of our own senses only, not those of his, which our imaginations copy. By the imagination, we place ourselves in his situation ..."

Or as the great man never said, or even implied... "greed is good".. 

Rant over... normal service has been resumed.

Edited by AndyHull
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, AndyHull said:

take a trip down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh to the Cannon Gate church,

Been quite a few times at the Royal Mile in Edinburgh, but didn't know ....... 😕

Edited by Endeavor
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

I have to confess that Harry Enfield was much more amusing than my fellow Scot, and so called father of economics, Adam Smith.

Smith did delve much deeper into what drives the wheels of trade than most people imagine.

Its a pretty tough and stodgy read for modern tastes though.

Most people have heard of his work "The wealth of nations." (strictly speaking its actually called "An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations", but that is a bit of a mouth full), but far fewer have encountered "The Theory of Moral Sentiments".

Smith is much misquoted and rarely read by those who profess to follow the capitalist religion, but such is the way of blind faith followers.

image.png.8d936637467e79518cca306acf00c724.png

I doubt that he realised when he penned his works that they would be so often used to attempt to vindicate the baser inclinations of the greedy some 265 years later.

If you are ever in the area, you might like to take a trip down the Royal Mile in Edinburgh to the Cannon Gate church, and ponder a while with him, the changes that have taken place since his time. As to actually reading his works... I suspect you may need to stock up in the extra strong coffee before you dive in, but they are, arguably worth the effort.

"As we have no immediate experience of what other men feel, we can form no idea of the manner in which they are affected, but by conceiving what we ourselves should feel in the like situation. Though our brother is on the rack, as long as we ourselves are at our ease, our senses will never inform us of what he suffers. They never did, and never can, carry us beyond our own person, and it is by the imagination only that we can form any conception of what are his sensations. Neither can that faculty help us to this any other way, than by representing to us what would be our own, if we were in his case. It is the impressions of our own senses only, not those of his, which our imaginations copy. By the imagination, we place ourselves in his situation ..."

Or as the great man never said, or even implied... "greed is good".. 

Rant over... normal service has been resumed.

Walk a mile in someone else's shoes and you still wont fully understand them.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Endeavor said:

Been quite a few times in at the Royal Mile in Edinburgh, but didn't know ....... 😕

When you have communed with the great man, don't forget to take a wander round the corner and across a few streets to Chambers Street to look in on my favourite clock in the National Museum of Scotland. They also do a nice cup of coffee there to warm you up after sitting a while with Mr Smith.

3 minutes ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

Walk a mile in someone else's shoes and you still wont fully understand them.

True, but at least by that point he has probably stopped chasing you to try to recover his shoes.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, AndyHull said:

When you have communed with the great man, don't forget to take a wander round the corner and across a few streets to Chambers Street to look in on my favourite clock in the National Museum of Scotland. They also do a nice cup of coffee there to warm you up after sitting a while with Mr Smith.

True, but at least by that point he has probably stopped chasing you to try to recover his shoes.

One way to get a bargain without going through ebay, I'd find someone with size 10 furlined boots, its bloody cold outside.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, AndyHull said:

Those boots and knees do look a little familiar.

I know that statue on that little market-place, but never read what it said ...... I must have been more occupied with looking at the surroundings what "nature" had to offer 😂

Edited by Endeavor
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 2/28/2024 at 4:16 PM, Endeavor said:

If we were to stop interfering with other peoples life, there would be a whole lot less wars.

I have been thinking about this sentence since it was posted and have come to the conclusion it is more true than it first appears. Looking at history it's packed full of examples.

It's not what we say that matters, it is what we do and its results.

Never forget that the evilest deeds have always been done with the best of intentions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • yes the things we read in the universe I did see some where it was either difficult to clean off or it contaminated the cleaning fluid there was some issue with cleaning. I was trying to remember something about grease where as opposed to a substance of a specific consistency they were suggesting it had a base oil with something to thicken it. That conceivably could indicate that the two could separate and that would be an issue. But there is something else going on here that I had remembered so I have a link below and the description of the 9501 notice the word that I highlighted? Notice that word appears quite a bit on this particular page like 9415 has that property all so they 8200 mainspring grease and that definitely has to be mixed up when you go to use it because it definitely separates. just in case you didn't remember that nifty word there is a Wikipedia entry. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thixotropy   https://www.moebius-lubricants.ch/en/products/greases I wonder if what you're seeing is the boron nitride left behind after cleaning. In other words it's the high-pressure part of the grease and it's probably embedding itself into the metal which is why it doesn't clean off and shouldn't be a problem?
    • Yes and no. I use Moebius 9501 synthetic grease and it is significantly runnier than the Moebius 9504 synthetic grease (and I assume Molykote DX) that I previously used. I haven't seen 9504 spread and it is in my opinion the best grease money can buy. However, my current method of cleaning doesn't remove it from the parts, so that's why I have decided to use the 9501 instead. I believe I read somewhere that Molykote DX too is difficult to clean off. Thinking about it, I'm pretty sure my 9501 grease which expired in June 2022 is runnier now than it was when it was new, but whether new or old it always needs to be stirred before use. So, that's why I treat the parts of the keyless works, cannon pinion, etc. with epilame. That was very thoughtful of you and something that had completely passed me by. Not sure what the epilame will do when it wears off in a non-oiled hole. Anyone?
    • Hi not found one either yet,  close relative is the 436 and 4361 according to ranff.db.   It gives quire a lot of detail but not as good as the old site.      RANFF.DB.
    • No problem to replace the setting with the staking set. Press the new setting from inside, use flat face punch with hole. The punch must be wider than the setting, the hole to be as not to press at the stone, but only on the bush. Press by hand until the setting gets flush with the plate surface, so the punch must rest on it.
    • Yes, the arbor usually makes about 3 to 3.5 turns. But usually spring takes 2/3 to 3/4 of the free space in barrel, not 1/2, so take it for the calcullations. This way the change in torque is smaller. I have a picture for You, this one is little older, but no mater
×
×
  • Create New...