Jump to content

Cleaning and removal of jewels


Recommended Posts

Good morning,

I'm working on a Vantage wristwatch.  The only numbers on the movement that i see are ST 92.  I've mostly been working on old pocketwatches and thus have not encountered this type of jewel settings.  Am i suppose to take the cap jewel out of that setting.  Am i supposed to take the hole jewel out of the base plate.  Or do i clean them where they currently are?  if the jewel in the base plate stays there, do i run it through the watch cleaning machine without the cap jewel setting screwed down?

On the shock setting, do i take the cap jewel out and leave the hole jewel in, with the shock spring back in place, while cleaning in the watch cleaning machine.  I couldn't find much helpful info with google, but if you know of a helpful link, i'd be much obliged.  Thank you.  Arron.

09172023101546.jpeg

vantage jewel.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 The shock system is Kif Trio, turn the spring to remove it as you want access to the hole jewel as well, to check , clean and peg it.

Release the power through the click, remove the cock- balance assembly, remove the fork, you might want to put some penertaing oil on all screws specially the small ones.

Clean means absolutely clean, clean with brush plus ultrasonic plus any other means you know, peg the pivots, pallets, jewels and pinions. 

When tearing the movement apart, take pictures as you go.

One cap stone plate has obviously got loose.

Rgds

 

Edited by Nucejoe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, arron said:

Good morning,

I'm working on a Vantage wristwatch.  The only numbers on the movement that i see are ST 92.  I've mostly been working on old pocketwatches and thus have not encountered this type of jewel settings.  Am i suppose to take the cap jewel out of that setting.  Am i supposed to take the hole jewel out of the base plate.  Or do i clean them where they currently are?  if the jewel in the base plate stays there, do i run it through the watch cleaning machine without the cap jewel setting screwed down?

On the shock setting, do i take the cap jewel out and leave the hole jewel in, with the shock spring back in place, while cleaning in the watch cleaning machine.  I couldn't find much helpful info with google, but if you know of a helpful link, i'd be much obliged.  Thank you.  Arron.

09172023101546.jpeg

vantage jewel.jpg

The two parts that you have indicated are end piece jewels. These act like  capstones over the holed jewels underneath. Remove and clean separately from the plate. I'm assuming the one ringed is from the watchmaker's side. The shock setting for the balance  as joes has said uses a kif design and should be taken apart and cleaned.

2 hours ago, arron said:

Good morning,

I'm working on a Vantage wristwatch.  The only numbers on the movement that i see are ST 92.  I've mostly been working on old pocketwatches and thus have not encountered this type of jewel settings.  Am i suppose to take the cap jewel out of that setting.  Am i supposed to take the hole jewel out of the base plate.  Or do i clean them where they currently are?  if the jewel in the base plate stays there, do i run it through the watch cleaning machine without the cap jewel setting screwed down?

On the shock setting, do i take the cap jewel out and leave the hole jewel in, with the shock spring back in place, while cleaning in the watch cleaning machine.  I couldn't find much helpful info with google, but if you know of a helpful link, i'd be much obliged.  Thank you.  Arron.

09172023101546.jpeg

vantage jewel.jpg

Something is broken , can you see where ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All those replies are very helpful.  i would like to seek clarification on the jewels.  the jewel in the oval is the cap stone.  am i suppose to remove that jewel from the small plate it is in or just clean both pieces together. 

the jewel in the rectangle is the hole jewel.  do i need to push that jewel out or just clean it in place.  if it stays in place do i need to re-install the cap stone plate before running it through the machine--do i need to worry that it will fall out otherwise.

 

I had not noticed that broken spring.  At some point in the day i did notice what's on the attached picture, but because i have at least four disassembled watches on my bench i didn't know where it came from--i thought it was a complete lever from one of the setting works.  Well, now i know.  Good thing i have an identical Vantage watch so i've got a spare part.

 

 

John, thanks for the reminder to check that database.  i know it's there but i seldom remember that it's there.  Arron.

vantage spring.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, arron said:

All those replies are very helpful.  i would like to seek clarification on the jewels.  the jewel in the oval is the cap stone.  am i suppose to remove that jewel from the small plate it is in or just clean both pieces together. 

the jewel in the rectangle is the hole jewel.  do i need to push that jewel out or just clean it in place.  if it stays in place do i need to re-install the cap stone plate before running it through the machine--do i need to worry that it will fall out otherwise.

 

I had not noticed that broken spring.  At some point in the day i did notice what's on the attached picture, but because i have at least four disassembled watches on my bench i didn't know where it came from--i thought it was a complete lever from one of the setting works.  Well, now i know.  Good thing i have an identical Vantage watch so i've got a spare part.

 

 

John, thanks for the reminder to check that database.  i know it's there but i seldom remember that it's there.  Arron.

vantage spring.jpeg

Yes, the jewel in the removable plate is the cap jewel.  Do not remove the jewel, clean both together.  You can clean it by hand using your solution and a paint brush.  If you are working on more than one watch, keep the parts separated. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, arron said:

All those replies are very helpful.  i would like to seek clarification on the jewels.  the jewel in the oval is the cap stone.  am i suppose to remove that jewel from the small plate it is in or just clean both pieces together. 

the jewel in the rectangle is the hole jewel.  do i need to push that jewel out or just clean it in place.  if it stays in place do i need to re-install the cap stone plate before running it through the machine--do i need to worry that it will fall out otherwise.

 

I had not noticed that broken spring.  At some point in the day i did notice what's on the attached picture, but because i have at least four disassembled watches on my bench i didn't know where it came from--i thought it was a complete lever from one of the setting works.  Well, now i know.  Good thing i have an identical Vantage watch so i've got a spare part.

 

 

John, thanks for the reminder to check that database.  i know it's there but i seldom remember that it's there.  Arron.

vantage spring.jpeg

Hi arron, the capstone jewels in the endpieces should not be removed. Without a jewelling tool would not be easy besides. I clean them separately and reinstall them during reassembly. 

9 hours ago, VWatchie said:

Can anyone answer that question? What price do you get?

broken.jpg.f40b1218f48a572c46668efd55fc517e.jpg

 

9 hours ago, VWatchie said:

Can anyone answer that question? What price do you get?

broken.jpg.f40b1218f48a572c46668efd55fc517e.jpg

Well spotted watchie, i seem to think rehajm also had it. You can split the winnings of a balance staff of your choosing 😆.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

If you have a good cleaning machine there is no need to remove shock systems.

What would be "a good cleaning machine"? The only argument I previously heard for not taking the shock systems apart when cleaning in a cleaning machine was to protect the hairspring and staff pivots from damage/wear and then clean the chatons and cap jewels separately. However, I was later told by or read a post by @nickelsilver that there were no risks in removing the chatons and cap jewels before putting them into the cleaning machine. And, that's exactly what I have been doing since and never had a single problem with damage/wear. Quite the contrary, it seems to be an efficient method for getting them really clean. 

I find it hard to believe that cleaning shock systems in situ in a cleaning machine will be as efficient as taking them apart before going into the cleaning machine, but I'm open and interested in hearing more about this!

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I do the same as you @VWatchie with the balance installed and chatons and cap jewels separate. 

I was always surprised in Marks videos on WRC that he didn't remove the jewels, and only after the cleaning machine did he remove, clean, and oil the cap jewels.  It's not the cleaning of the cap jewels I'd be worried about (as I always do a final check and clean by hand if necessary), but I'd be worried that the balance pivots would not get a full clean. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

What would be "a good cleaning machine"? The only argument I previously heard for not taking the shock systems apart when cleaning in a cleaning machine was to protect the hairspring and staff pivots from damage/wear and then clean the chatons and cap jewels separately. However, I was later told by or read a post by @nickelsilver that there were no risks in removing the chatons and cap jewels before putting them into the cleaning machine. And, that's exactly what I have been doing since and never had a single problem with damage/wear. Quite the contrary, it seems to be an efficient method for getting them really clean. 

I find it hard to believe that cleaning shock systems in situ in a cleaning machine will be as efficient as taking them apart before going into the cleaning machine, but I'm open and interested in hearing more about this!

I'm the same watchie.  I think the more surfaces that are exposed the better the cleaning method is. If the shock assembly is intact there are edges and joints that cant be reached and flushed out throughly I suppose it all depends how good your cleaning machine is, it cant take anything apart though 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, VWatchie said:

What would be "a good cleaning machine"?

A good cleaning machine would be one that you do not have to disassemble some jewels like American pocket watch Jewels you can keep them together. Which is rather nice because usually the screws are all stripped and that would be a pain to deal with. On the other hand if you're dealing with something modern that has Incabloc even with a nice cleaning machine I would still take them out. Then you can put the balance wheel with its bridge back on the main plate without the jewels and the balance pivots are protected Even without the jewels. Especially good with etachron systems Where it's inconvenient to remove the balance from the bridge anyway.

So you want an outstanding state-of-the-art modern cleaning machine. With unfortunately a undesirable price. Uses vacuum to move the fluids around and it keeps the chamber under a vacuum during the cleaning process. This means all the little bubbles of air that's trapped like between and stones is pulled away. Two separate ultrasonic frequencies very very nice. Just really expensive fortunately I didn't have to buy it as it's where I work we have one and yes it does do an outstanding job of cleaning.

https://youtu.be/Wcc_Bk7DO4k?si=nX65yriRuLFPxqdR

But that wasn't really the answer you are seeking was it? The real question would be able with an ultrasonic watch cleaning machine how far will fluids penetrate if you have and stones? Some of those are actually designed for cleaning but most are not. If the lubrication is organic then they basically still have to come apart. Or even with the fancy machine up above if you end up with a metal fragment no I don't know how it got in their but there was a metal fragment once on a balance jewel assembly I had to disassemble it is no way a cleaning machine can get that out.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had many watch cleaning machines. I must say this L&R VARI-MATIC WATCH CLEANING MACHINE was the best when it came to cleaning have a built in ultrasonic in the cleaner was a big plus and it was automatic. They are very old now but I wish I still had it.

img-0607.jpg

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, oldhippy said:

I have had many watch cleaning machines. I must say this L&R VARI-MATIC WATCH CLEANING MACHINE was the best when it came to cleaning have a built in ultrasonic in the cleaner was a big plus and it was automatic. They are very old now but I wish I still had it.

When I was in school that was one of the cleaning machines they had. Then yes I would agree this is definitely an outstanding cleaning machine. But the reference to old is there anything really old In watch repair? The reason I make the reference to old is if you do a search for L&R VARI-MATIC  You'll find references to people restoring of them is a complete user service manual out there there's YouTube videos. So they may be old but there's still in use. Although I do find it quite fascinating that the hydraulic system is still working after all these years or the ultrasonic for that matter. My understanding is the ultrasonic transducer gets unhappy if you don't keep the fluid level up high enough and you risk Burning out your transducer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Nucejoe said:

 How can a jewel under cap stone be checked?  where there is a cap stone, it must be removed to see the hole jewel.

 A 48hrs soak in CocaCola wont cost anything and you'd be amazed with how easy screws unscrew its specially helpful with little screws.

Do you receive any commission for endorsing their product Joe.  Any difference in the results between full fat or skimmed, flat or fizzy ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That will mean dismantling the gear train, which with 5 pivots to align was a pain. Probably going to have to though. I'm convinced it's something to do with the great wheel. 
    • As far as I know, the only time an epilame treatment has potential drawbacks is when something is rubbing on the treated part w/o lubrication in between creating abrasive dust. That is, I don't believe in the method of "running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed". So, I think the rule would be; do not epilame treat parts where rubbing is going on without lubrication. Other than that I don't think we have anything to worry about. That said, I'm not an expert, and I'm always happy to learn more. Has any other repairer than Alex suggested or explained the "making-a-groove" method? My impression is that it's just something he constructed in his mind. I have not perceived it as a generally practiced method. Again, I could be wrong!
    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
×
×
  • Create New...