Jump to content

How can the cannon pinion gear be widened to reduce friction?


Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Khaledabdwatch said:

كيف يمكن توسيع ترس ترس المدفع لتقليل الاحتكاك؟

It would be nice to have a picture of the particular watch in question. Then English is the preferred language on the message board fortunately there's Google translate which Translates the list. It would help to have a picture of the problem.

How can the cannon gear trench expand to reduce friction?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A little known technique that works great is: With the cannon pinion installed on the watch, use a pair of fine cutting pliers and squeeze the cannon pinion right in the original dent that creates the friction. It actually counterintuitively reduces the friction. Just a little squeeze goes a long way.

 

You can also broach it, as Klassiker says, but this becomes difficult to next to impossible on closed cannon pinions (most watches without center seconds).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

A little known technique that works great is: With the cannon pinion installed on the watch, use a pair of fine cutting pliers and squeeze the cannon pinion right in the original dent that creates the friction. It actually counterintuitively reduces the friction. Just a little squeeze goes a long way.

I'm trying to reason why this works? Intuitively you would  squeeze at right angles to the dent.

I try pushing it down a smoothing broach to try to push the dent out, rather than a cutting broach which would remove metal.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, mikepilk said:

I'm trying to reason why this works? Intuitively you would  squeeze at right angles to the dent.

I try pushing it down a smoothing broach to try to push the dent out, rather than a cutting broach which would remove metal.

 

I can't really explain why it works, but it does. I was shown this by the fellow who inspected my pieces when I was doing Claret minute repeaters (it's like a 6 page checklist of pure ball-breakage haha). They really wanted good cannon pinion friction, but if it was a little too tight they'd make you adjust it, which is really a pain on a repeater cannon pinion. The kind guy gave me that tip, and that's how I've done it since.

 

If I don't have my cutting pliers handy I might do as you with a smoothing broach, but again, on closed cannon pinions you are either grinding down the end of your broaches to finally get the perfect bit to push the dent just right, or you need another technique.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 A canon pinion that can be installed on the watch is likely not to be overly tight or it wouldn't have got on the center arbour.  I add a bit of oil ( not grease) and turn the minute wheel with the crown, it often turns which indicates its not overly tight , keep turning to reduce friction.  you then remove clean the parts involved, grease and instal.

Try it, you have more success than you think.

I haven't tried this on watches with chrono complication, too sensative to extra friction I imagine.

Rgds

 

Though I haven' 't studied Arabic, I think I understand some of OP's words. 

کیف  how

یمکن possible

المدفع  tube

لتقلیل reduce

الاحتکاک friction

 

Not bad ha.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to make sure. As far as I can reason, the only time it makes sense to test the cannon pinion friction is after service. In my experience, friction usually diminishes after service. That is when the cannon pinion has been thoroughly cleaned and lubricated. BTW, I always lubricate the inside of the cannon pinion rather than the centre wheel arbor. It feels like it eliminates some of the risks of getting the grease where it's not supposed to be.

5 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

use a pair of fine cutting pliers and squeeze the cannon pinion right in the original dent that creates the friction

image.png.f34ad50e15370dffde54fabeb948f519.png

It feels sort of embarrassing having to ask, but what does "a pair of fine cutting pliers" look like? Perhaps something like the picture above (link in the picture)? Any specific recommendations or advice?

Edited by VWatchie
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, VWatchie said:

It feels sort of embarrassing having to ask, but what does "a pair of fine cutting pliers" look like? Perhaps something like the picture above (link in the picture)? Any specific recommendations or advice?

Those look pretty good. I have some old Dumonts here, and really like Lindstrom (from your neck of the woods). But even good quality nail clippers can work, straight face is nicer than curved.

 

I also like to grease the inside of the CP. I don't want the grease contaminating the oiling of the center wheel!

 

lindstrom cutters.png

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

To make a blind hole in a thin minute hand that would fit a cannon pinion correctly would be 100x (1000x?) times harder.

I've given this some thought today, and I believe it's more to do with the extra overall height you would need. To cover the open end of the cannon pinion, the minute hand would need a collar or tube on the underside, with a thickness of at least that of the hand itself. The space between the hour and minute hands would increase accordingly.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I did make the mistake once of increasing the friction to much with a cannon pinion.. Lesson learnt never adjust the friction of a cannon pinion without total control. I now use my sietz jeweling tool that has a stump specifically for this task. There are other tools such as the Bergeon 4733. To reduce the friction a small smoothing broach would be the best way. 

Edited by clockboy
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, mikepilk said:

I think someone mentioned using nail clippers

That does work, ive tried it and tested the cannon pinion's position on a smoothing broach. A before and after with and without an insert in the cannon pinion. Without an insert it tends to crush the tube, with an insert the indent is more localised to one small area. I do have a specific tool that has an anvil to tap into the cannon pinion which does a better job.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Neverenoughwatches said:

That does work, ive tried it and tested the cannon pinion's position on a smoothing broach. A before and after with and without an insert in the cannon pinion. Without an insert it tends to crush the tube, with an insert the indent is more localised to one small area. I do have a specific tool that has an anvil to tap into the cannon pinion which does a better job.

I use the "pointy thing" in the staking set, which is used to align the holes. It has a nice sharp tip. I put a bit of brass, or a broach in the pinion to prevent crushing, then a very light tap with the hammer 🔨

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mikepilk said:

I use the "pointy thing" in the staking set, which is used to align the holes. It has a nice sharp tip. I put a bit of brass, or a broach in the pinion to prevent crushing, then a very light tap with the hammer 🔨

Ah ok, I'll have to check my staking set for that, it has loads of accessories with it. The small device that i have is similar with a chisel bit. I did find it odd that applying pressure to the same point would open it slightly, a slightly different size or shape bit i wonder. I woukd have thought like squeezing something out of a tube, squeeze at 90 degrees pulls the contents back inside by rewidening the tube 🤔

Edited by Neverenoughwatches
Link to comment
Share on other sites

اخي في مسنات رفاع كتير اسمن بروتش بالانكليزي دور علين بس انتبه انت وعم تشتغل وماسك القطعة ما تنحني او تنطعج او يتغير شكلا لأنك بتصير بمشكلة اصعب من المشكلة الاولى.

There I answered in Arabic, I hope I did a good job explaining thinfs since I don't really use Arabic when talking about watches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...