Jump to content

Bronze Tweezers


chadders1966

Recommended Posts

 

for a watchmaker with no specific preferences, general work, what is the nicest to use for a pair of no.3?

I personally use #5 for most of my work (as a hobbyist). Unless you are doing very delicate and minute work a #2 will do a fine job and when you are dealing with bridges and "heavy" or tight big things, a #2 with the wide tips are invaluable. With that said, hardness and how fine the tips can practically be, play an important role. I tend to abuse my tweezers. I start nice and then I forget and start using them stick fashion and even "rust brush" fashion. When I realize what is going on, I have to dress the tips again...and it is the pinging what alerts me: parts flying away! Also, the tension you feel in your fingers and how wide the tips open naturally are a matter of comfort and preference.

 

All that said, anti-magnetic (the true quality not a middle of the road solution) and chemically/rust proof are very valuable since they allow for precision of placement...parts don't stick to the tweezers (or ping away because of tips imperfections by rust or other, read pitting and eroding). So, carbon is very hard but is affected by everything so the next better are the Electronic (non magnetic) and the Hi-Tech (non magnetic, chemically resistant) but they are relatively soft in the Dumont selection of steels, one better is the Dumoxel which has a good compromise between hardness and all the other qualities...then, you have Dumostar at US$50 a pop that compete in hardness with carbon and is impervious to rust, chemicals, magnetism, you name it. Even then, the finer tips to be achieved are still carbon!

 

And of course, you have the titanium alternative...but I haven't tried those...

 

I hope it helps,

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

 

PS. Brass is non magnetic but very soft...so they won't scratch your work. The feel is somewhat different and tips are dressed almost continuously no matter what you do, some are harder than others but too hard will defeat their "gentle" purpose of being...and it is still brass. Range of quality goes from Indian or Chinese to Bergeon to Dumont (when available). Horotec and Bergeon -- as far as I know -- are a good compromise between hardness and finish for that material.

 

Then you have the aluminum tweezers with different materials for tips (usually those tips can be replaced when worn). They are special purpose and mostly the feel (tension in your hand) is horrible for me. Like too soft or not quite "springy" on the horotec versions and better on the Vestus (? spelling).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/F-S-Tracking-Number-Hozan-P-893-PHOSPHOR-BRONZE-TWEEZERS-from-Japan-/281847721072?hash=item419f6eec70:g:8oYAAOSwT5tWOazu

Was debating getting one of these Japanese made ones, but the Swiss ones look a little less chunky and better finished. ( and also has serrated grips, which might not be ideal )

These are the tweezers I posted about at the start of the thread. They're good, but I find them slightly too large - personal preference obviously. I've just received a pair of these new ones. Whilst they look pretty similar size wise, I just prefer the feel of them.

Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

I used Dumont Hi tech for a couple of decades because they were cheap, good quality and did not stain. Then I got a pair of Asco Bronze while at WOSTEP. What I discovered is that the SS tweezers are far more likely to have a part flying due to its hardness. Oh that I had learned this sooner! No telling how many hundreds of hours could have been saved. Brass is even better for griping the part, but constantly need dressing. Bronze are a good compromise. They are slightly less hard than steel parts and hold up well. I highly recommend them. I use a heavier pair of brass for plates and fine ones (also Asco) for jewels. .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose this is a good time to report back on the Asco bronze tweezers, It's as remade said, they have a pretty damn near perfect balance of hardness that makes them reasonably wearing and hold small parts with incredible ease.

Other than that the proportion and shape of the tweezers is exactly what you want as well, and I can't form any complaint over the quality of manufacturing.

 I keep my pair in a plastic sleeve (that actually a screwdriver came in) with one of those tip guards and they come out every time I'm setting hands or doing anything else that's slightly more delicate and they really have become indispensable, my favorite pair. Had them for several months and I've redressed them lightly twice, once was because I dropped them (damn it!).  

 

Edited by Ishima
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

All:

It's not that much of a problem to use brass pliers and just keep them dressed. It only takes a few minutes to restore them back to working order with only a file.

Here's a video that showed me how to do it and I've been using this technique for over a year now.

I hope this helps.

Tom

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Roger,

Holes are OK but don't make them 14 mm or you will be infringing Spyderco's licensing!!! :D

Just a bad joke! Drill the hell out of them, just be careful they don't come apart at the top where they are glued/welded together. That and a little reshaping and you'll be happy with them. When you are at it, check that the "springiness" is not negatively affected. In my mind, brass and/or bronze tweezers are less springy than steel which for my taste is a minus...but I still own a pair gathering dust in a drawer (until I work on special watches that is).

Cheers,

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/29/2015 at 3:27 AM, chadders1966 said:

Hi,

Having seen various recommendations for using bronze tweezers I have looked without success for any UK/European seller. The only seller for watchmaking ones listed on Ebay is in the US and hasn't responded to my requests for information. In the past Sutton Tools, despite mainly dealing in jewellery supplies, have said they will get me any item I'm interested in from the wholesalers. It's a Catch-22 though - how do I know whether I want to go to that expense when I don't know if I want them anyway?

Does anyone here use them? They are apparently similar to brass in that they don't leave marks, but are more hard wearing and don't deform as easily. As an experiment I did buy some sold on EBay (photos below). I do actually like these, but as you can see they are slightly large compared to the brass and steel watchmaking tweezers. I am sure I will get plenty of use out of them though.

Stephen

 

20150628_150734.jpg

 

20150628_150809.jpg

Here is a link  Why not use brass    http://www.esslinger.com/brass-tweezers-non-magnetic-5-straight-tip-5-sizes-sold-individually/

Edited by TimFitz
something to add
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, TimFitz said:

As you can see from the photo I posted I already have brass tweezers, I was after some bronze ones. Since I made the op over a year ago I have bought a couple of decent pairs - I find them far better than brass tweezers as they don't leave marks and don't require dressing any where near as often.

Rog, as I posted I agree with you about the Hozan, they are too bulky for watch work. I use some Asco ones that someone else posted about.

Stephen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was after some bronze ones. Since I made the op over a year ago I have bought a couple of decent pairs - I find them far better than brass tweezers as they don't leave marks and don't require dressing any where near as often.

That's because bronze is harder then brass.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Surely it depends on the clock , I only usually restore torsion clocks and I only use oil on mainspring ( small amount) but on the few so called normal pendulum clocks I have done I have used mainspring grease as there is more reserves of power than there is in a torsion clock so it is not so critical. Dell
    • https://watchguy.co.uk/cgi-bin/files?showfile=Venus/Venus 178.pdf&filename=Venus 178.pdf&dir=Technical Manuals&action=documents   The hour recorder is driven by the barrel and it will only stop if it is held by the hour recorder stop lever 8690. So I would check if this lever (powered by the spring 8691) is really holding the hour recorder in the "chrono off status". I haven't worked on a Venus 178 so far, but on an Omega 861 I chose 9501 grease for the friction spring as it's moving very slow at quite high tension.
    • All I do is use a fine marker (sharpie) to put the service date on the back cover, this way it can be removed with some IPA and does no permanent damage to the watch. I'm in two minds about the whole service marking thing, sometimes it's good/bad to see the markings on the watch case back as you know it's been worked on and vice versa. However, if I took my car in for a service and the mechanic scratched some code into the housing of my engine I wouldn't be too impressed. Hence, I think my sharpie solution is a reasonable compromise.
    • hmmmm.... maybe there is a way to skin that cat 🙀 let me think on it... unless anyone else has any ideas? I left the opening in the side of the base and ring quite large to maybe allow you to grip the crown, but appreciate this may not always be possible, especially for small movements where the crown will not extend past the outer wall of the holder. I noticed this also, but after using the holder for a while I noticed that the ring/holder began to wear into shape (rough edges/bumps worn off) and the size became closer to the desired movement OD. Maybe with some trial and error we could add 0.5 mm (??) to the movement OD to allow for this initial bedding-in?
    • Hi nickelsilver, thanks for the great explanation and the links! I'll take a good look in the article.  Especially this is great news to hear! Looking through forums and youtube videos I was informed to 'fist find a case and then fit a movement for it'. But seems that's not the case for pocket watches at least?  I guess I should be looking to find some 'male square bench keys' for now. I was thinking of winding the mainspring using a screwdriver directly, but I found a thread that you've replied on, saying that it could damage the spring. 
×
×
  • Create New...