Jump to content

Ladies vintage Seiko watch


Recommended Posts

Hi all!  I'm new to this list, just found you folks.

This is one of the watches I got from a friend whose mother died last year, and I would like to refurbish it.  It works, but the watch face needs cleaning, so I need to take the watch stem out to gain access to the face. 

Back of the watch shows it's a Seiko 2C21-5041, 452294.  I went online to look for a manual, and didn't see it.  I have tried all of the dimples, and pressed into that little divet just above the stem, but nothing seems to be happening. There is also a screw that I have tried to unscrew, but it's extremely difficult, and I have only managed 1/4 turn. 

Red circle = screw I have turned 1/4

Green circle = all the dimples I have tried pressing

Blue circle = divet I pressed into

 

Does anyone know what I should try or focus more on?  Thank you!  I'm looking forward to learning.  :)

20200726_112355_resized_1.jpg

20200726_112648_resized_1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't encountered this particular mechanism, but I suspect that a quarter turn on that screw in one direction or the other may be all that is required to allow the crown to be extracted. Proceed with caution, it is very easy to damage things.

When you pull out the crown, does anything move on the back of the watch apart from the stem. Sometimes pulling the crown exposes a metal "flag", or a tag with a dimple in it which needs to be pressed before pulling the crown a little harder (but not too hard of course).

What are the stamped numbers under "Japan" on the back of the movement?

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The stamped numbers under Japan are 2C21A.  It took VERY careful looking, but when I observed the watch from an angle at the divot just above the watch stem, I was able to see some movement when I pulled the crown out.  I'm thinking I need to do something there, and not the screw.  Here are the innie & outtie pics.   When   pressed from the top, nothing happened.  Should I press (gently) from an angle?

 

Crown in.jpg

Crown out.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cousins have the service manual. It describes the parts, and lubrication. I suspect you gently press down (towards the face) on the dimple in the above picture with your tweezer point, and gently pull the crown at the same time, to remove it, but check the service manual, and assembly diagram, which should make things clearer.

 

https://www.cousinsuk.com/PDF/categories/4558_seiko 2C20A and 2C21A.pdf

 

 

 

Edited by AndyHull
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm....the cleaning didn't go too well.  I used a Q-tip with a touch of rubbing alcohol (dipped then squeezed out excess), and it looks a bit better, but not as clean as I had expected it to come out.  Less green, but still spotty.  Is there a better way to clean a face like this, or is this the best I'll be able to do?

Watch face.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried both types of erasers (old #2 style & new white style), and there wasn't much improvement.  I think it's as good as it's going to get.  Thank you!  The watch does look better overall, I feel better now that her watch is at least clean, both inside and out. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As mentioned, the finish is damaged. You *may* get a little better results with a q-tip dipped in distilled (white) vinegar, but the more aggressive you get, the greater the risk of further damage.  Remove any excess with clean water with a drop of dish soap (washing up liquid). Use distilled water, if the water in your area has high levels of minerals, as these can leave a white bloom on the dial.

Keep away from any lettering, as it is more likely to lift than stay in place if you rub it.

A replacement dial would be the way to go, assuming you are not able to get satisfactory results with your cleaning, but that might be a little tricky to source. You might be better to leave a little patina and live with the thing's history.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...