Jump to content

My Pulrta 10 Lathe


Titanium

Recommended Posts

I got a Pultra lathe and I'm very happy to finally have a watch makers lathe so I though I'd share some photos. Now I need to find collects that I can us to clamp drill bits into the tail stock and I'm happy. Any advice would be appreciated.

 

5b204095a536d_Pultra(2).thumb.JPG.3ce252d3c666d247fc2bbcafb21933f0.JPG

 

5b2040f1d1685_Pultra(3).thumb.JPG.4440181b70590ed25fbbea41536f9993.JPG

 

5b2040d99525e_Pultra(4).thumb.JPG.7ac3c5fe53f3d5a72638c4694ec586e5.JPG

 

5b2040b6f095a_Pultra(1).thumb.JPG.21f11ebf52d2a36b9e76ab1686aa17dd.JPG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very nice, Pultra's are high quality machines, they were a brand of Smart Brown who rank among the finest lathe makers, ever.

I'm pretty sure that lathe is 8mm, despite the name.  Tony's lathe site explains it all - the 8 and 10 geneva lathes were both 8mm.  Can you measure the body dia of a collet and let us know?

http://www.lathes.co.uk/pultra-8-and-10/

As for drilling, I don't think its going to happen readily with that tailstock.  Few 8mm lathes seem to have that function - tailstock collet mounting.  The reason is (afaik) that its not really needed, holes are made by make a making a small centre mark with a graver then drilling with the drill held in a pin vise.  The hardest part is make the centre without a pip in the centre of it, but ounce that is figured out its quite easy and  being handheld, is very sensitive which is needed for small drills.

Pultra definitely made a 10mm lathe -  a shot of mine is below.  its a treat to use, its a bit bigger than the 8mm collet lathes

https://imgur.com/EVGFDOG

 

Edited by measuretwice
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply's. I was thinking I might not find a drilling tail stock. I have plans in my head to make one so I'll post it here if it works.

The collets are definitely 8mm (apart from one 6mm which I didn't even know existed).

Also it came with documents so I think I'll PDF them and send a copy to Lathes.co.uk as they were asking for some.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the reply's. I was thinking I might not find a drilling tail stock. I have plans in my head to make one so I'll post it here if it works.
The collets are definitely 8mm (apart from one 6mm which I didn't even know existed).
Also it came with documents so I think I'll PDF them and send a copy to Lathes.co.uk as they were asking for some.

Could you make the odd available here too? ;0)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
On 6/13/2018 at 3:24 AM, Titanium said:

I got a Pultra lathe and I'm very happy to finally have a watch makers lathe so I though I'd share some photos. Now I need to find collects that I can us to clamp drill bits into the tail stock and I'm happy. Any advice would be appreciated.

 

5b204095a536d_Pultra(2).thumb.JPG.3ce252d3c666d247fc2bbcafb21933f0.JPG

 

5b2040f1d1685_Pultra(3).thumb.JPG.4440181b70590ed25fbbea41536f9993.JPG

 

5b2040d99525e_Pultra(4).thumb.JPG.7ac3c5fe53f3d5a72638c4694ec586e5.JPG

 

5b2040b6f095a_Pultra(1).thumb.JPG.21f11ebf52d2a36b9e76ab1686aa17dd.JPG

@Titanium What size collets does this lathe take? Also what other manufacturer collects can this one take?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, rodabod said:

No, it uses 8mm collets. I own this exact lathe. Most 8mm collet brands will fit, but Conflex were the originals supplied with the Pultra 10.

So here starts my confusion when you say most 8 mm collet brands will fit.

In the attached image, Pultra 10 collect dimensions are mentioned. These dimensions exactly match with Boley 8mm, B.T.M and Webster-Whitcomb. All other brand collets vary in dimensions.

I think collets that do not fit precisely in the lathe will affect its work holding capability hence, quality of the end product.

Also it will affect health of lathe adversely.

I may be wrong here but my assumptions are based on attached pic and reading on various internet fora.

It would really help us if you could shed some light on following questions.

=>>Are you using different manufacturer collets on your Pultra 10 ?

=>>Exactly which brand collects are you using? (So that I can also buy same collets to avoid potential wastage of money)

=>>How they affect work holding in the lathe?

=>>How much accuracy you are able to achieve with this setup.

=>>Other tips you may have on this topic are earnestly welcome.

 

Thanks in advance.

2019_10_25 5_39 PM Office Lens.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The original standard was developed by Webster Whitcomb. If you look at many of the above sizes they are either the same or very very close. The thread pitch of 40tpi comes out to 0.635mm, and in the real world that's close enough to interchange almost all the time. What gets sticky is the thread diameter; if you look at Lorch they have a 0.625mm pitch but the thread diameter is 0.275", which is big enough to bind in many drawbars intended for the 0.268 WW thread. You can see there are several including Bergeon and Wolf Jahn with a 0.270" thread diameter, and from experience these work well across many makes.

 

Differences in length B of a couple of millimeters doesn't generally pose a problem, it's sort of a silly dimension callout there, as there are varying head total diameters (Bergeon, Wolf Jahn, Schaublin and others are a full millimeter larger than WW) which will throw off that length without changing the function. The keyway may vary a bit over different makes, and some lathes may have a slightly larger key which interferes. It is OK to very carefully reduce the key size with a sharp file. If the lathe spindle is well made the file won't touch it anyway, but the key is soft enough to cut.

 

What's really important in buying collets is that they are truly 8mm, or more specifically 7.99mm plus a few microns. The original WW spec is 0.3147" which comes to 7.993mm. This is because the bore in the lathe is very precisely 8mm in diameter, and they wouldn't fit in if they were also 8mm. The bore is where 90% of the accuracy comes from, the angled face of the spindle and corresponding angle on the collet are to close it- they must also be extremely accurately made of course, but the bore and collet fit are where the real business takes place.

 

From experience older American made collets from Derbyshire, Levin, Hardinge (often marked Dale), are all good. European makes of Wolf Jahn, Bergeon, Schaublin, G.Boley, Boley Leinen, and certainly some others are all good. I have used all of the above in several makes of lathe including Webster Whitcomb, Levin, Leinen, Boley. Likewise from experience Starrett (nothing to do with the measuring tool manufacturer) and Peerless are some of the worst. They are soft, and undersized. You can see above Marshall/Peerless, the body size is 0.312" or 7.93mm. That's enough undersize to seriously affect accuracy and repeatability.

 

Any collet however good it may look may be useless due to abuse in the past. Some ugly collets run perfectly. When buying used you just have to accumulate and sort through, make a set of really good ones, keep another set for rough work.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, nickelsilver said:

The original standard was developed by Webster Whitcomb. If you look at many of the above sizes they are either the same or very very close. The thread pitch of 40tpi comes out to 0.635mm, and in the real world that's close enough to interchange almost all the time. What gets sticky is the thread diameter; if you look at Lorch they have a 0.625mm pitch but the thread diameter is 0.275", which is big enough to bind in many drawbars intended for the 0.268 WW thread. You can see there are several including Bergeon and Wolf Jahn with a 0.270" thread diameter, and from experience these work well across many makes.

 

Differences in length B of a couple of millimeters doesn't generally pose a problem, it's sort of a silly dimension callout there, as there are varying head total diameters (Bergeon, Wolf Jahn, Schaublin and others are a full millimeter larger than WW) which will throw off that length without changing the function. The keyway may vary a bit over different makes, and some lathes may have a slightly larger key which interferes. It is OK to very carefully reduce the key size with a sharp file. If the lathe spindle is well made the file won't touch it anyway, but the key is soft enough to cut.

 

What's really important in buying collets is that they are truly 8mm, or more specifically 7.99mm plus a few microns. The original WW spec is 0.3147" which comes to 7.993mm. This is because the bore in the lathe is very precisely 8mm in diameter, and they wouldn't fit in if they were also 8mm. The bore is where 90% of the accuracy comes from, the angled face of the spindle and corresponding angle on the collet are to close it- they must also be extremely accurately made of course, but the bore and collet fit are where the real business takes place.

 

From experience older American made collets from Derbyshire, Levin, Hardinge (often marked Dale), are all good. European makes of Wolf Jahn, Bergeon, Schaublin, G.Boley, Boley Leinen, and certainly some others are all good. I have used all of the above in several makes of lathe including Webster Whitcomb, Levin, Leinen, Boley. Likewise from experience Starrett (nothing to do with the measuring tool manufacturer) and Peerless are some of the worst. They are soft, and undersized. You can see above Marshall/Peerless, the body size is 0.312" or 7.93mm. That's enough undersize to seriously affect accuracy and repeatability.

 

Any collet however good it may look may be useless due to abuse in the past. Some ugly collets run perfectly. When buying used you just have to accumulate and sort through, make a set of really good ones, keep another set for rough work.

Wow this is some intense knowledge. Big thanks for elaborate description. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, vinn3 said:

    Beware;    their are mm threads ( UK )   AND  S.A.E.   ( US ) thread forms. AND " nare the twain will meet"   vin

Thoroughly noted. Thank you.  

Is there any means by which we can make a distinction between the threads?

Thanks, Sid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Sid said:

Thoroughly noted. Thank you.  

Is there any means by which we can make a distinction between the threads?

Thanks, Sid.

You can use a thread gage. If you have inch (tpi, threads per inch, for 8mm collets generally 40tpi) and metric (distance from one thread to the next, as above for standard 8mm collets 0.625mm) gages, you will see that they are for all intents and purposes the same. You might not be able to differentiate, and almost all drawbars will be happy with either.

Edited by nickelsilver
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, nickelsilver said:

You can use a thread gage. If you have inch (tpi, threads per inch, for 8mm collets generally 40tpi) and metric (distance from one thread to the next, as above for standard 8mm collets 0.625mm) gages, you will see that they are for all intents and purposes the same. You might not be able to differentiate, and almost all drawbars will be happy with either.

@nickelsilver Thank you very much :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Sid said:

Thoroughly noted. Thank you.  

Is there any means by which we can make a distinction between the threads?

Thanks, Sid.

   measure the thread diameter,  count the threads per inch and look it up in the machinery handbook.  cheers  vin

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I sound that some drawbars I have which are quite worn-in are not fussy at all about slight differences in 8mm threads.

The biggest variability you will likely find among 8mm collets is the condition. Idiots use an incorrect size and either crush them or over-expand them, leaving them wrecked.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It looks like the canon pinion function is part of this great wheel. The pinion nearest the clip runs the minute wheel on the dual side. The pinion nearest the wheel is driven by a small wheel from under the setting lever cover plate that engages in hand setting position.    So when assembled the crown was driving the whole great train. Does this mean the pinions are too tight? Should I attempt to disassemble this great wheel and lubricants?
    • Picking up this side-tracked post again as I just removed a balance staff of a 1920's Omega (35,5L-T1) I was impressed by the way @Delgetti had his setup when he had to change out a balance-staff (https://www.watchrepairtalk.com/topic/28854-new-balance-staff-not-riveting-to-balance/page/2/#comment-244054 Not only that, but also the idea of removing the seat first before punching the staff out from the seat-side, avoiding the whole discussion of the rivet yes/no enlarging the hole. I didn't have the fancy clamps & tools Delgetti has, so I used my screw-head polishing tool. Initially I used #1500 grit diamond paste on the steel wheel, which kinda worked, but very slow. I changed to #800 grit diamond paste, which worked better, but still slow. Then I glued #240 sanding paper to the steel disk; That worked and the disk was hand-driven. Once close to the balance wheel, I took the sanding paper off and continued with #800 diamond paste. One can only do this when the balance wheel sits true on the staff and has no "wobble". I went on grinding until I saw some diamond paste on the rim of the balance wheel. This was as far as I could grind and it seemed that there wasn't much left of the seat. Carefully, with my staking set, I knocked the staff from the seat-side out. Turns out that the thickness of the seat left, now a small ring, was only 0.1mm. The balance wheel hole is in perfect shape and no damage done to the wheel at all. Of course, if the wheel has a "wobble" or isn't seated true on the balance staff, you can't get as close and there will be more left of the seat. In my case, it worked perfect 🙂 I'm very happy how this method worked out ! 😊  
    • As is tradition, one step forward, two steps back. Got the board populated and soldered into place without any issues.   But no hum. So I started testing the coils with an ohmmeter. I got 5.84k ohms across D1 (from red to red in the picture below), which is as expected. But I'm getting an open circuit for the other drive coil and feedback coil, D2 and F1 (from green to each of the two yellows).   Since the movement was working with my breadboard setup, it implies I somehow broke the connection between the coils and the solder lugs. They're all the way at the bottom of the lugs, but maybe the heat migrated down and broke the connections? I guess it's possible it happened while cleaning the flux off, but I used a soft artist's brush and isopropyl alcohol. I did a lot of high magnification examination, and I don't see any issues, but let me know if you see anything I missed or if you can think of anything else I should check.
    • 1947 NOS Ambassador 'C'. Actually, the case came without the movement so the movement isn't NOS, but she sure is pretty.
    • Hi attached is the AS 20XX. Service sheet although there is no 2063 mentioned it may be of some use to you AS_AS 2060,1,2,6,4,6.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...