Jump to content

Seiko 7S26A Complete Service Walkthrough


Recommended Posts

I just manipulate the part near the hairspring stud. After that it will be fine again. I guess the cause is the user knock the watch too hard or drop it and the hairspring material is too soft to withstand the force.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just manipulate the part near the hairspring stud. After that it will be fine again. I guess the cause is the user knock the watch too hard or drop it and the hairspring material is too soft to withstand the force.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Interesting, I have had that few times not but not just with Seiko,s. The issue for me with Seiko,s is lack of amplitude. The best I get is around the 230 mark but I must say they run fine & keep good time. The next time I service a Seiko I will change the mainspring (if I can purchase one) just the see the difference achieved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting, I have had that few times not but not just with Seiko,s. The issue for me with Seiko,s is lack of amplitude. The best I get is around the 230 mark but I must say they run fine & keep good time. The next time I service a Seiko I will change the mainspring (if I can purchase one) just the see the difference achieved.

 

In my experience related above I used a new MS but still facing poor amplitude. A good new 7S26 goes around 285 with peaks of 305, still with many beats off place.  I've also seen brand new NH36 not going above 230. 

Edited by jdm
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess that's the reason why they used graphite-mixed lubricant for the mainspring.

During service, after the mainspring is taken out, place it on the table to see if it lies flat then it's still good. If it doesn't lie flat, then it will affect the amplitude.

I guess the softer material of the hairspring is also the culprit of lower amplitude for Seiko 7S26.

The ones I've serviced, range from 200 to 280 of amplitude depends on the condition of the movement.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Steven: Thank you Steven I'll try that next time...I have a couple of Seikos in need of TLC! :)

 

@jdm: That's interesting since I've always suspected Seiko springs in general were rather flimsy.

 

@CB: Good thought CB, if you come up with a successful substitution of a main spring, please, let us know.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@jdm: That's interesting since I've always suspected Seiko springs in general were rather flimsy.

 

I've used a GR MS with p/n mentioned above. Seiko only provided the barrel complete, now not even that is available anymore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, ofrei lists a whole bunch of mainsprings, but he uses the Denison equivalent. Cousins lists that main spring as: 0.95 x .11 x 400 x 10 Automatic Is there a way to convert the units?...and possibly, how to read this description. Thanks in advance.

 

Cheers,

 

Bob

.95 tall, .11 thick (strength), 400 long for a barrel diameter of 10. The 7S26 barrel size is actually 10.5 but it fitted fine anyway. Other people used a slightly different type which costs more almost to the point of making more convenient to order a new movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. I know what you mean, cousinsUK's prices are about US$10 while ofrei charges US$18 both without shipping...and there is not much difference on shipping costs. In the end, it is just a matter of how long it takes to get the parts, since both will be about the same cost. I wonder if the material in ofrei is a different (maybe better?) one as you pointed out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have noticed that Seiko hairsprings are very susceptible to variation/damage.

 

I'm currently engaged in practicing removal of hairsprings/roller tables and balance staffs from a pile of old balance assemblies.

 

I am very impressed with the "robustness" of some of the vintage hairsprings, even with my clumsy first attempts a number of the vintage hairsprings showed no sign of damage at all.

 

They don't make'em like they did in the old days ;-)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After servicing the 4R37 and initial adjustment to centralise the hairspring, put it on the timegrapher and the reading was...

85531c95df7fe9c140bbadf1920b3a92.jpg

What the heck happened! I remembered of not demagnetize it yet so I zap it with an instantaneous demagnetizer. Instantaneous demagnetizer is wonderful, fast and easy. The immediate result is...

eedc2ea0e7513d444d0a082c7462de65.jpg

Manipulated the hairspring again and again and again and finally got it right.

4f844c76369c20e9848c652cc6242d6f.jpg

I'll call it a day now, tomorrow will case it.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Finally some results. I have selected the balance that gives the best results and got the following. Amplitude is still not great, it's not a champion of isochronism across positions, but I'm happy with the regularity. Will finish assembly and recase to finally be able wear a watch that I've took apart and made work again :)

I've learned a lot in the process and got a couple of ideas to improve these service guides, I hope to be able to post my own soon.

 

post-1542-0-40297500-1449943570_thumb.jp

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites




  • Similar Content

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Post some pictures , some good close ones of the parts you've described. 
    • Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. Ive never used epilame H only information i have read and mentally stored about it mostly from Nicklesilver here and elsewhere ( the fork horns thing ), maybe the residue powder that is removed has some grinding effect ? So probably a good idea to limit its application areas to only the absolute necessary. Yes as far as i know epilame rubs off relatively easy, the technique of running the watch to make a groove through it first in the pallet stones where the lubrication is then placed. This i understand creates the barrier for the lube to sit up to. If i can find a good balance of pros and cons of its use then thats one process i can avoid by using a thixotropic lube on the stones. The epilame i would say allows for a more fluid lubrication to be used that would increase amplitude on low beat movements. The stearic acid powder is extremely cheap, the problem is the fuming process to coat parts, is not selective , the whole part has to treated in this method. If epilame residue can cause wear then thats not good, if I remember the conclusion was not proved entirely just a general assumption between watchmakers. The thread is out there somewhere, the same discussion is also old on a facebook group. If its a potential problem for amateurs to use then i would prefer not to take the risk .
    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
×
×
  • Create New...