Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I found this video on YouTube and found it informative and interesting. The watchmaker is using traditional tools and techniques to repair a watch dial.

 

david

Posted (edited)

I may not have any better suggestions for repairing dial feet, but...what the hell is he doing?!:pulling-hair-out:
I could forgive the method, better to have those 2 points of damage visable on the dial than the dial spinning, but he shows a breathtaking disregard and lack of care to the face of the dial at almost every point of handling it. nope nope nope. I think i need to go lye down for a while now. :D

Edited by Ishima
Posted

When watches were first made hundreds of years ago, propane, acetylene and even cross slides weren't invented yet; let alone the torch. Dead center turns were used to make staffs and pivots until live center lathes came onto the scene.

 With the exception of a motorized watchmaker lathe,this watchmaker is using, more or less, traditional tools and techniques. Obviously a dial foot soldering machine or even a torch would leave a smaller impact on the watch dial. My guess is the watchmaker in this video did not have access to these tools yet he repaired the watch with the tools he had on hand and did it in a very skillful manner.

david

  • Like 1
Posted

If the repair is hidden then I suppose it could be a way. The interesting part for me was how he steadies the piece with the end of the tip over rest. I might try that one. If he had used a song metal glue & did not drill completely through his method would work.

  • Like 1
Posted

If you watch some of his other videos you can see that he is highly skilled and seems to have years of experience. I would find it hard to be judgemental  toward his approach as I do not know his situation.  Many people in the eastern block countries live under extreme poverty as well as having to deal with political and infrastructure problems. It can be difficult to afford food let alone a bottle of Loctite or a tourch.  I feel that he did well with what he had to work with. 

david

  • Like 2
Posted

Hello David,

I accept totally what you say in respect of the Eastern block countries. 

  Jarosław Wilczyński definitely has skills far in excess of anything I, as a tinkerer, would aspire to. I decided to look at some other videos he has put on the tube and was surprised to see that he has indeed got all the modern equipment you would need as a watch repairer and maker. Check out what he was using 4 years ago "Zarta 1800 watch consist" and some of his other videos showing timing machine, parts cleaner etc.

Without, I hope, being judgemental, I feel that he was merely demonstrating his skill in a way to perform a task, perhaps as it would need to be done if you did not have the relevant tools, and in honesty he succeeded from that point of view.  I would guess that he perhaps would not work that way normally and was just having some fun.

The idea of taking a hammer to the front of a dial especially without a fine punch certainly had a shock effect on me. However, even with the two holes he created and covered with white paint the whole demo of his skill was educational. As I said I do not have his skills and would probably have used something stupid like sticky dial pads.

In conclusion, I recommend that people should check out his video on "Omega Seamaster - Cleaning, folding, checking" if you want to see some more of his real skill, he has the most steady hands I have seen and note the attention to cleanliness and care - finger cots included. A talented guy.

Regards,

Vic

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

In the Seamaster video he handles the dial with a pair of steel tweezers! And the hand removing and fitting was a bit scary. Who hammers on hands? 

Edited by rodabod
Posted
31 minutes ago, Geo said:

Have a look and see, 2:50 mins in.  :huh:

Good Lord, my pocket watch is smaller than that beast.  

I've never tried hammering the chrono hand on before but then maybe that's why mine slip.

Posted

I wonder if it's easier to tap them on when they are new and feel a bit tight. I'd be worried about cracking a jewel or damaging a bush if the movement holder didnt support it at the rear. 

  • Like 1
Posted

Vich,

I was impressed with the watchmaker's skill and obvious experience. Apparently some of the other forum members were not. I am anxiously awaiting their videos covering the same repair procedure. 

david

  • Like 1
Posted

David, I don't think they all meant to bash the man for his technique, but only to point out that it was quite unusual. Ok that was an inexpensive Seiko 5 watch, and probably he was just showing an alternative "ancient" method to do that kind of repair, but looking at his other videos, I do sometimes see things that make me cringe sometimes. And I am not a professional watchmaker, just a hobby watch repairer... So my opinion is to be taken for what it is worth: almost nothing.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • it would be nice to have the exact model of the watch the or a picture so we can see exactly what you're talking about. this is because the definition of Swiss watch could be a variety of things and it be helpful if we could see exactly the watch your dealing with then in professional watch repair at least some professionals they do pre-cleaned watches. In other words the hands and dial come off and the entire movement assembled goes through a cleaning machine sometimes I think a shorter bath perhaps so everything is nice and clean for disassembly makes it easier to look for problems. Then other professionals don't like pre-cleaning because it basically obliterates the scene of the crime. Especially when dealing with vintage watches where you're looking for metal filings and problems that may visually go away with cleaning. Then usually super sticky lubrication isn't really a problem for disassembly and typically shouldn't be a problem on a pallet fork bridge because there shouldn't be any lubrication on the bridge at all as you typically do not oil the pallet fork pivots.  
    • A few things you should find out before you can mske a decision of what to do. As Richard said, what is the crown and all of the crown components made of . Then also the stem .  The crown looks to have a steel washer that retains a gasket. So be careful with what chemicals you use to dissolve any stem adhesives or the use of heat. You might swell or melt the gasket unless you are prepared to change that also . The steel washer maybe reactive to alum. Something I've just used to dissolve a broken screw from a plate. First drilled out the centre of the screw with a 0.5mm carbide . Dipped only the section that held the broken screw in Rustins rust remover. This is 40 % phosphoric acid. 3 days and the screw remains were completely dissolved, no trace of steel in the brass threads. A black puddle left in the solution.
    • I suppose this will add to the confusion I have a roller jewel assortment. It lists out American pocket watches for Elgin 18 size and even 16 size it's a 50. But not all the various companies used 50-50 does seem to be common one company had a 51 and the smallest is 43. American parts are always interesting? Francis Elgin for mainsprings will tell you the thickness of the spring other companies will not even though the spring for the same number could come in a variety of thicknesses. But if we actually had the model number of your watch we would find it probably makes a reference that the roller jewel came in different dimensions. So overlook the parts book we find that? So it appears to be 18 and 16 size would be the same sort of the arson different catalog numbers and as I said we don't have your Mongol know which Log number were supposed to be using. Variety of materials garnered her sapphire single or double but zero mention about diameters. Then in a section of rollers in this case rollers with jewels we do get this down in the notes section Roller specifications but of course zero reference to the jewel size. I was really hoping the roller jewel assortment would give us sizes it doesn't really. But it does show a picture of how one particular roller jewel gauge is used  
    • Seems to still do it through my mobile data, I use an android phone almost exclusively, but I'll double check it. Thanks mark Strange, I'll try my laptop that utilities edge. I've been on site half hour since I got home, it hasn't done it yet. Thanks John
    • At work, I'm on MS Edge, not through chose, on my phone, chrome, no issues with either. 
×
×
  • Create New...