Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Ordered this watch today so I could learn to take it apart, clean it and put it back together again. Its a 18 jewel movement that looks to be in pretty good shape. Hopefully no problems and I can just practice dissasembly and assembly.....any thoughts?

image.png

  • Like 2
Posted

Don't think of it as victim, rather a patient that needs a doctor's touch. B)  I could see in the pic that your primary winding wheel screw has been used a bit more than normal. (often an indication it had been over torqued at some point in time) Probably wouldn't hurt to capture each step of disassembly with photos, in case you are called away from your "victim". Good luck and if you get stuck with something, just ask, someone should be able to help.

  • Like 2
Posted

Molnija 3602? An improved SSSR variant of a 15 jewel Cortebert 616. Good choice, I think. Solid movements, affordable and still plentiful. Quite a few sites and videos about them too, Molnija is quite popular.

Another bonus is that one can imagine working on a vintage Rolex movement in a Panerai while rebuilding it, as mentioned Corteberts were used by them... :)

  • Like 1
Posted

Good Luck ... I am new too... What I did my first time was take just a few components off and put it back together , then the next attempt go a little deeper and put it back. It was a good exercise and built a little confidence also gets you familiar with where things go.

Also as WileyDave suggested taking photos of each step is invaluable. 

 

Using method I described above I was able to fix a broken watch ( it was just the mainspring) my first time out. Must have been beginners luck, because it seems the more I know the more problems I am starting to have. LOL 

 

Regards 

Anthony

  • Like 1
Posted

Hey Douglas1701

Good luck !...

I'm going to do the same to this elgin and see how it goes...I will try to do the same way adioro110 did on his .

Regards...

 

image.jpeg

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, WileyDave said:

Don't think of it as victim, rather a patient that needs a doctor's touch. B)  I could see in the pic that your primary winding wheel screw has been used a bit more than normal. (often an indication it had been over torqued at some point in time) Probably wouldn't hurt to capture each step of disassembly with photos, in case you are called away from your "victim". Good luck and if you get stuck with something, just ask, someone should be able to help.

I saw that screw you are talking about, it doesnt look to bad in the other photos.

image.png

Posted

Not too much to be wary of on this one. The crown wheel screw (with three slots) is left hand threaded though so urn it clockwise to undo.

Have fun.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Douglas1701 said:

Why does it have 3 slots?

It's to let you know it is a left hand thread.  A lot of watches have this identification but not all, so be careful in the future.

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, CapMoy said:

Hey Douglas1701

Good luck !...

I'm going to do the same to this elgin and see how it goes...I will try to do the same way adioro110 did on his .

Regards...

 

image.jpeg

Good deal...hope it works out good...gonna be a little while before i get started. Still waiting on stuff to arrive. Im sure this one will look brand new when you get finished with it. 

Doug

Posted

It is in not working condition seller said balance is not good but I will try to take all apart clean it and see how it goes ...I do not know , if possible , how to fix it .

I will take this as a practice before servicing my working Rockford watch...

Moises

  • Like 1
Posted

I always try to view problems as learning opportunities I believe the success at the end is so much sweeter.
Bit deep for me, obviously need malt whisky!
Cheers,
Vic

  • Like 2
Posted

Hello Vic

Agree with you ...I will try to work on it with no shacking hands and at the end the learning it self will be a success..
Regards
Moises


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
6 hours ago, Endeavor said:

Perhaps this may be of any use? http://linuxfocus.org/~guido/molnija-pocket-watch/

I just serviced one, very nice and easy to work on; great "starter";

58a55df9f357d_Molnija3602.thumb.jpg.a0869b734df1cecc24872a9bace2b546.jpg

Thanks for the post. I actually found that site a few weeks back. The one i ordered was runing a bit fast, so i adjusted the speed very slightly and I put to test with a digital stop watch to see of it was keeping time pretty good...tested it for 30 minutes and it kept up second by second untill i stopped the test. I jave check it for two days now and it remains insync with my ipad....not to bad for $45.

thanks again,

doug

Posted

I was telling the guy I bought it from in bulagaria how much I like the watch and I hated the fact it would be my practice watch. So he sent me a free movement that needed some balance work for the cost of shipping...so turns out this wont be my first victim after all.....lol

Posted

That's a good price !! I guess you have seen on that website that a nearly similar, or similar, movement was used by Rolex. Can't be that bad.

The one I just serviced was very nicely polished on the back (even with blued screws), but crudely finished underneath. Money had to be saved somewhere.

Chances are yours has a good finish all around. That you received a next to "freebee" is even better as a starter. Take your time, and the first watches will be under your belt ;) 

  • Like 1
Posted

Here is a pic of the one I ordered. There is a spot at the 10:00 o'clock position...looks like some hot gold solder or something similar dripped onto the plastic dial. Im going out on a limb here...and correct me if im wrong..but from what i have read about American railroad watch accuracy, this watch keeps better time. So far its at about 2 seconds per day which from what i understand is pretty dang good. 

image.jpeg

image.jpeg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The watch is from 1990 and was serviced just once around 20 years ago. No idea if the mainspring barrel was ever opened or changed before now.
    • Interesting but I think we have a problem here? We probably need to split hairs on a definition problem. For instance take a real Rolex movement put it in a real Rolex case but not the one it came in take a real dial real hands and make up a watch that is 100% real and what exactly is this? If you send your Rolex in for servicing and anything's been changed at all from what it was when it left the factory Rolex will be unhappy and remove all offending components. This does become a problem of people changing things because they think it's their watch and they want to have a different dial Lord diamonds the bezel or whatever words Rolex sees all of this as evil and bad as far as a Intel Rolex only things the watch is legit if everything is exactly what it was when it left the factory and nothing's been changed including the stem everything asked me Rolex original or their very unhappy about its existence. Then you think about a fake watch what is its real purpose? Well its real purpose is to make money for somebody and fool the customer. So all the watch has to do is look pleasant on the outside and inside can be anything. Typically nobody's going to see inside. So typically anything that's not legit counterfeit movement etc. why would someone spend so much time and effort making it look just like a real Rolex when there's no need to? Unless of course you have one or two movements to impress somebody with this is what's inside your watch but even that is problematic Now we don't end up with I've interesting problem that troubles me where I work. The owner will offend a cage your watch by looking at it carefully with a microscope the timing machine etc. and he will point out all the things that he feels are not appropriate correct or whatever for your watch. But in my example above of mixing and matching legitimate Rolex parts he wouldn't necessarily be able to tell. The problem I have with this is it often times things like his claim to telling a counterfeit is look at the second hand the quality of the secondhand is not as nice as a legitimate one. But maybe somebody replaced a second hand on a real Rolex. Or the other day at work I don't know what it was in before but there was a really pretty movement transparent back and they decided it was fake because of? Now I didn't think it was fake I took one look was beautifully manufactured but they had a reason What bothers me with counterfeit Rolex is or anything counterfeit watch related it is reminding me of a witchhunt. The early days of witch hunting how can we tell a which Manon which? That makes me wonder how many super fakes are really fake at all it's basically somebody deciding it's a fake based upon inappropriate assumptions. Like the secondhand is been changed or the watch was worked on the screws are perfect or other things. Other minor problems with super fakes for instance I have a long story the not going to tell the short version is I found the website once where they claim to be counterfeiting Rolex watches. They even had a picture to prove their counterfeit watch the problem with pictures online how do we know it's really a counterfeit watch and not a real Rolex watch that you're telling us is counterfeit. Oh and they had testimonials from all kinds of people who bought their watches and were very happy with the service of course the problem with the watch is you don't know what's inside it unless you take the back off and just because somebody shows a picture online and says this is their super fake maybe it really isn't a super fake they be there just trying to say that. We end up with a interesting problem of manufacturing a watch. Does Rolex actually make every single part found in their watch? Then the year 2004's basically irrelevant. This is because initially Rolex buys stock in the company and they manufacture Rolex watches. I'm assuming over time Rolex will acquire more stock and only in 2004 do they get the whole company. But the company itself hasn't really changed other than the name on the front of the building. The real question is did they really make every single component found in the Rolex watch from the beginning of time until end of the time? A lot of the components found in a watch would be extremely specialized did they make their own jewels or their own mainsprings for instance? But that is looking at the article they employ a heck of a lot of people now I would guess now that Rolex probably does make everything in-house. Especially when they have nifty CNC equipment like for making screws were he could make a huge batch of one type it instantly switch to another type where before he needed specialized machines for one machine for one screw now manufacturing all kinds of stuff in-house becomes very simple. But still is possible that in the early days they might have outsourced something may be perhaps. But conceivably we do have minor changes in thing is due to how things have been made over time which can lead to confusions over whether this is legit or not when it may be as a change of manufacturing methods oh and regarding the screws found in your Rolex watch? In about mid-80s I went to a school reunion in Switzerland. One of things we could do was visit a factory and I picked Rolex because I wanted to see the mass production making of Rolex watches. Which is very disappointed I did not get the sea at all because didn't see them making Rolex watches in their Geneva headquarters even though the building is really fake? So what did we get to see well after sales service because after all were watchmakers we should see that. Did learn something interesting about Rolex screws if your watch was sent to Rolex the screws that come back are not the ones that went there. As they are using powered screwdrivers they don't want to risk breaking heads off and they will replace the screws of every single watch. The other one of interest was suppose there's a scratch and you can see the brass? No problem they have a solution that basically electoral plates without electricity so the scratch goes away. The research Department was quite boring and didn't look like anyone was ever there. Then it was too long ago to remember all the details other than I was disappointed I want to see manufacturing.   Yes the joys of artificial intelligence that is more like a trained monkey that's there to please you.
    • Hey everybody! I just registered to WRT. I found this forum searching for informations about ELMA watch cleaning machines (will get one ELMA tomorrow ✌️). I'm new in watch repair, collecting watch repair tools to fill up my work space 😎.   Greetings from Vienna Michael
    • Is it not covered in the manual under Profix Cap Jewels?
×
×
  • Create New...