Jump to content

Looks like this watch will be my first vitim....


Recommended Posts

Trust me, I have no intentions of doing anything else to it for a long while.....lol.....well, nothing other than keeping a check on lost or gained time. I guess this is essentially a rolex movement. A copy of the cotebert 616 which had 17 jewels and this one has an added jewel to be 18 jewels. The movement has a pretty good finish on it also. Some of them deffinately do not. How does your rolex do from day to day? A friend of mine boought a $12,000 rolex wrist watch one time, that is the only one I have ever seen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 31/01/2017 at 10:49 AM, Douglas1701 said:

Ordered this watch today so I could learn to take it apart, clean it and put it back together again. Its a 18 jewel movement that looks to be in pretty good shape. Hopefully no problems and I can just practice dissasembly and assembly.....any thoughts?

image.png

Douglas , good choice because it's a simple movement ;)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Douglas1701 said:

Trust me, I have no intentions of doing anything else to it for a long while.....lol.....well, nothing other than keeping a check on lost or gained time. I guess this is essentially a rolex movement. A copy of the cotebert 616 which had 17 jewels and this one has an added jewel to be 18 jewels. The movement has a pretty good finish on it also. Some of them deffinately do not. How does your rolex do from day to day? A friend of mine boought a $12,000 rolex wrist watch one time, that is the only one I have ever seen.

Now we have time on computer, laptop, smart phone, and sometimes we can see the time on some buildings. Yes Rolex is of pure quality as Vacheron Constantin and some other brands, However, in view of what I list above, it's too expensive paid $ 12,000 for a watch today. True that this is only my personal opinion. I hope it is gold 24 Karats :)
Edited by SeikoWatch
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dont remember much about the rolex...only saw it once 20 years ago. He won the lottery in florida and thats why he had the money to buy it...lol....I just completed another time study with this molnija ...in 4 hours and 30 minutes the difference between it and the digital stop watch was 1.5 seconds....is that pretty decent?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Douglas1701 said:

I dont remember much about the rolex...only saw it once 20 years ago. He won the lottery in florida and thats why he had the money to buy it...lol....I just completed another time study with this molnija ...in 4 hours and 30 minutes the difference between it and the digital stop watch was 1.5 seconds....is that pretty decent?

Today it was lying on the table all day, before it was in my pocket and on the table part of the day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just ordered my first victim, and then I found this thread and read this article ... now I wish I had read this first

On 16/02/2017 at 7:05 PM, Endeavor said:

 

Perhaps this may be of any use? http://linuxfocus.org/~guido/molnija-pocket-watch/

I just serviced one, very nice and easy to work on; great "starter";

 

I'm thinking that Molnija is very cool, perhaps I know what my second victim will be ;-) I wanted my first victim to be the cheapest thing I could get my hands on, and in fully working condition. I'm sorry to say it's not as pretty as those older Molnija's. Why is it vintage watches in general are more aesthetically appealing than modern ones, same goes with cars (I know why classic cars are sexier than modern ones)?

Here's the cheap chinese one I ordered.

Fashion-Bronze-Mechanical-Hand-Wind-Pocket-Watch-Roman-Numerals-Skeleton-Gears-Watch-Men-Women-Watch-Large (1).jpg

Fashion-Bronze-Mechanical-Hand-Wind-Pocket-Watch-Roman-Numerals-Skeleton-Gears-Watch-Men-Women-Watch-Large.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, SteveT said:

I just ordered my first victim, and then I found this thread and read this article ... now I wish I had read this first

I'm thinking that Molnija is very cool, perhaps I know what my second victim will be ;-) I wanted my first victim to be the cheapest thing I could get my hands on, and in fully working condition. I'm sorry to say it's not as pretty as those older Molnija's. Why is it vintage watches in general are more aesthetically appealing than modern ones, same goes with cars (I know why classic cars are sexier than modern ones)?

Here's the cheap chinese one I ordered.

Fashion-Bronze-Mechanical-Hand-Wind-Pocket-Watch-Roman-Numerals-Skeleton-Gears-Watch-Men-Women-Watch-Large (1).jpg

Fashion-Bronze-Mechanical-Hand-Wind-Pocket-Watch-Roman-Numerals-Skeleton-Gears-Watch-Men-Women-Watch-Large.jpg

Man, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if its anything like the cheap chineese one that i have, the movement is about the size of a wrist watch....alot smaller than a normal pocket watch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Douglas1701 said:

Man, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if its anything like the cheap chineese one that i have, the movement is about the size of a wrist watch....alot smaller than a normal pocket watch.

The movement part you can see in the opening is about the size of the movement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Douglas1701 said:

Man, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but if its anything like the cheap chineese one that i have, the movement is about the size of a wrist watch....alot smaller than a normal pocket watch.

Bummer, oh well never mind it was only the price of 3 takeaway Latte's so no loss .. I will search for a molnija 3602

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As Wiley Dave suggests , take photos as you dissemble your watches . You can never take too many . On more then one occasion I was glad I took photos and have used them for reference as needed , or when someone else comes up with a question about the same movement or procedure it's good to have them handy to share .

Also as a suggestion , I sometimes use ice cube trays to place the part along with their particular screws . And then it's easy to see the order that I disassembled the watch . I will even take a photo of the parts and screws in the trays so I know which parts go with which screws after I clean them .

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh nice. I have a similar wedge style stump for my staking tool, so I'll give that a shot. Thanks!
    • Thank you all for the replies!  Very informative! True enough, the Gamsol took some time to evaporate and does leave a residue. So not all naphtha are created equal!  Need to find alternatives then. i was able to try Hexane recommended by Alex and it seems great.  I wonder what the cons are?
    • Yeah, I saw that in the tech sheet but I don't see how it can be adequately cleaned with the friction pinion still in place. I've accidentally pulled the arbor right out of the wheel once when I used a presto tool to try and remove it. Mark shows how he does it with the Platax tool. Those are a little too pricey for me so I got one of these from Aliexpress and I just push down on the arbor with the end of my brass tweezers. That usually gets it most of the way out and then I just grab the wheel with one hand the and the friction pinion with the other and gently rotate them until it pops off. Probably not the best way but it's seemed to work for me so far.    
    • Thanks, Jon Sounds like a plan. Obviously I'll have the face on so do you think gripping with the holder will create any problems, but I will check in the morning to see how feasible it is but I assume it only needs to be lightly held. As for holding the movement instead of the holder won't be possible in this scenario as one hand will be puling on the stem while the other pushes the spring down. That was my initial concern is how the hell can I do this with only one pair of hands. All the other times I've had to remove the stem hasn't been a problem, apart from the force required to release the stem from the setting lever, but now I need to fit the face and hands its sent me into panic mode. If it had the screw type release things would be a lot simpler but that's life 😀   Another thing I will need to consider is once the dial and hands are fitted and the movement is sitting in the case I will need to turn it over to put the case screws in. I saw a vid on Wristwatch revival where he lightly fitted the crystal and bezel so he could turn it over, is this the only option or is there another method?      
    • Hi Jon, do You think that relation spring torque - amplitude is linear? I would rather guess that the amplitude should be proportional to the square of the torque. I had once idea to check it, but still haven't.
×
×
  • Create New...