Jump to content

From the Sussex Riviera


skridlov

Recommended Posts

Hi there everyone

by no stretch of the imagination would I describe myself as a watchmaker and at my age I never will be able to. However I've been a modest collector for many years. I've recently thrown my lot in with an old friend who has dealt in watches for decades. He has a huge number of "project" watches which have been accumulating and we're sharing the load of reviving and selling them. There are many interesting specimens which over the years have become more and more viable for resuscitation. He's quite comfortable with basic maintenance and minor repairs and I'm quite competent at project management (30 years in media IT and associated technologies.) Here's a snap of some of our stock - lots more to unpack and start categorising. Forgive me if I post the occasional naive question!

Roy

 

Watches-9144.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, many interesting items and many more in bags. My mate Len hadn't laid eyes on some for up to 25 years but has an amazing memory for where and when he found them. Some fascinating bits and pieces. Much of it could be sold "as is" but we're going to try to revive as many as possible. There are very many so called "trench" watches with lovely movements, many Borgel cases. Commonest problem with these is stems and crowns. I'm going to try to identify all the good movements as a first step toward trying to source replacement parts. It occurs to me that if several identical parts are required it may be possible to have them made by a small precision engineering company rather than paying UK watchmaker prices which push these into the realm of non-viability.

Roy

Here's an interesting pocket watch

 

PW-pillar-1260005.JPG

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I cannot read the name on the plate, if you can get your hands on the books Watch and Clockmakers of the World volume one and two you should be able to find him along with the date of when he was making pocket watches. The bow is not the original; I think it also has maintaining power it looks like it, which is a higher-grade movement. The dial is what I expected to see plain and simple, one hand has been replaced and I think it’s the minute hand, the hour hand style is spade the minute would also be plain and not decorative.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Welcome and I'm going to guess it's Jos Stephens of London on your fusee:

http://www.academia.edu/4132414/LIST_OF_MEMBERS_OF_THE_CLOCKMAKERS_COMPANY_OF_LONDON_FROM_THE_PERIOD_OF_THEIR_INCORPORATION_IN_1631_TO_THE_YEAR_1732.1_By_C._OCTAVIUS_S._MORGAN_F.R.S._F.S.A

Just a guess mind you, keep us updated on any unusual finds in your hoard!:)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, GeorgeClarkson said:

nice pocket watch! and nice collection too! If you happen to find some chronographs.... ;) let me know!

There's one nice movement with a nearly perfect dial - the gold case was scrapped year ago (yes, I know...). It's probably a Venus movement. Can't recall the brand name on the dial but it's a similar design to an Orfina which I've had for years. I'll send you a snap if you'd like.

At present we're just trying to catalogue what we've got and try to figure out the best plan for marketing it all. Some we'll sell "as is" but some we're going to try to revive first. My partner in this project is reasonably experienced at basic handling of watches but this is all a bit of an adventure - for our advanced ages.

Found an interesting Czarist era Russian item. If only I could find it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, skridlov said:

There's one nice movement with a nearly perfect dial - the gold case was scrapped year ago (yes, I know...). It's probably a Venus movement. Can't recall the brand name on the dial but it's a similar design to an Orfina which I've had for years. I'll send you a snap if you'd like.

At present we're just trying to catalogue what we've got and try to figure out the best plan for marketing it all. Some we'll sell "as is" but some we're going to try to revive first. My partner in this project is reasonably experienced at basic handling of watches but this is all a bit of an adventure - for our advanced ages.

Found an interesting Czarist era Russian item. If only I could find it...

Yes please, I would like to see that... can't promise anything though, since I have been on a "Russian Chronograph Buying Rampage" lately.... :P

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.



  • Recently Browsing

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Following on from my question about identifying screws in the AS2063 movement that basically fell out of the case in bits, I’m pleased to report that I’ve got it all back together, and the movement is running pretty well.    But… There’s something wrong with the keyless works and hand setting. It’s fine in winding and quickset date position - these work - but in hand setting position winding the crown turns the whole gear train.  I don’t really understand how it’s meant to work. It doesn’t have a traditional friction fit cannon pinion.  The second wheel is unusual with a pair of smaller pinions on it, which seem to interact with the barrel and the motion works.    Could this be the problem? I must admit I just cleaned it and popped it in place when reassembling the gear train. I’ve lubricated the pivots but didn’t do anything to the extra bits on the second wheel.    Does this make sense and is anyone able to figure out what I’m doing wrong? Thanks in advance, as always.    ETA - the parts list calls it the Great Wheel, not second wheel. 
    • You're thinking metal to jewel in general I guess. Maybe it would be a good idea to peg the pallet staff jewel hole on the main plate after the epilame treatment. I think that could work as it is my impression that the epilame doesn't sit very hard, but I could be wrong about that so feel free to educate me. I didn't remember that 9501 was thixotropic (thanks for the link). That would mean it's even runnier during impact (lower viscosity) so perhaps it's time I get some fresh grease as mine seems a bit too runny. What I have seen is a whitish surface after washing but it goes away if I scrub the surface with a brush in a degreaser (Horosolv). I don't think it embeds itself in the metal but sticks very hard to the metal. I don't worry too much about the cleaning solution. I just want perfectly clean parts and my solution can be replaced for little money (ELMA RED 1:9). Anyway, I quite often need "to strip back and rebuild" and scrubbing parts by hand isn't exactly the most stimulating part of a service. Just got confirmation that Moebius 9501 has a lower viscosity (68 cSt at 20° C) than 9504 (305 cSt at 20°). The viscosity of Molykote DX is 285-315 cSt at -25° to +125° C. I was surprised to see that the viscosity of Moebius 9010 (thin oil!) is higher (150 cSt at 20°) than my 9501 grease!
    • I’ve had a couple movements where it is clear the previous watchmaker was diligent with lubrication but the old epilam had turned to a fine white powder covering the pallet fork and keyless parts, which can’t be good for parts. I’m spare with epi since I don’t know how long it takes to degrade to that state…
    • I have read some suggestions that it can cause wear , particularly on the fork horns of a fully treated pallet fork. I've had half a kilo of steriac acid powder on a shelf for almost a year now, might have a little play today with a heater and a jar.  I think its because it gets into their cleaning solutions Mike. Theirs or anyone else's that services the watch next time, or if they need to strip back and rebuild. Could preclean but thats all time for a pro. I thought the idea was for the epilame to create a barrier, a wall between the lubrication and anything else, so the lube cant spread.
    • As I'm only cleaning watches in small numbers at home, I pre-clean any significant deposits of old grease and oil before using the cleaning solutions. I scrape off deposits with pegwood and Rodico, and if really dirty, wash parts in naphtha with a brush.  So I'm happy using DX, but can understand why it's avoided by the pros.
×
×
  • Create New...